Quote from: From the Bunker on July 10, 2025, 07:55:57 PMQuote from: Milltown Row2 on July 10, 2025, 04:50:46 PMQuote from: From the Bunker on July 10, 2025, 02:15:50 PMQuote from: Milltown Row2 on July 10, 2025, 01:30:17 PMNo men got a look in at the camogie game last weekend, but sure there was a lady doing the men's semi hurling final!
The sickener for women's equality was the same age for retirement age lol
If all the women involved know the game, have maybe played and have competent analysis ability, then I have no bother with that. Putting in a token male who may not be as knowledgeable for the sake of it commentating on Camogie. It's all about the best people for the job not balancing gender numbers.
So how many women are male intercounty hurlers that know the game? So by your logic she's a token female being put in for the sake of it?
None to the answer to the first bit. Didn't mean to come across that way with your second question. There is no doubt that there are male and female pundits able to talk about the opposite sexes game. And if they are good enough why not - but it should not be based on gender balance.
But its not happening, one way street it seems, if we are on about equality rather than playing experiences and insight from that, then I'm confused as why male pundits at camogie games are very very rare but nearly every week in male football and hurling we have a woman who has never played the men's game.
Camogie has a lot of male managers who'd have great insight into the game btw.
I'd have more respect for broadcasters if they just came out and be honest and say we are trying to even up the panels..
It's like the girl that does the rugby, English girl, no experiences really to draw from in the mans international standard of rugby
Commentators can be both in my book btw