9/11 What really happened to WT7?

Started by Fuzzman, September 28, 2016, 04:32:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Eamonnca1

Quote from: GTP on September 13, 2024, 04:09:27 PMIf you intended to bring down the buildings using controlled explosions why not simply drive a large truck into the underground car park with a bomb and use it as a decoy. Covering up one form of demolition by using a completely different method i.e. flying a plane into the building seems overly complex.   

Because they already tried something similar eight years before and it didn't work.

1993 World Trade Center bombing

The tinfoil hat crowd would simply point to the 1993 bombings and say it couldn't have worked.

LeoMc

#301
Quote from: Seamus on September 13, 2024, 06:31:43 AM
Quote from: RedHand88 on September 11, 2024, 08:39:28 AM
Quote from: Seamus on September 11, 2024, 03:23:26 AM
Quote from: Wildweasel74 on September 09, 2024, 10:28:28 PMWT7 collapsed, because guess  what, they hadn't decided to drop half a building on it, and have internal fire rage through it, to test if it take such damage. Just like a bad fire at Grenfell highlighted a material deficient. Never understood why rainscreen cladding hadn't External fire breaks outside floor levels anyway

So half a building falling on World Trade Center 7 was the main cause of the collapse, a 10 second collapse into its own footprint. I presume you are talking about one of WTC 1 or 2 being the instigator. That is 55 floors falling on top of WTC 7, have you video evidence of this? The official lie didn't even come up with that one.

It didn't collapse onto its own footprint. Debris was spread across a wide area. The surrounding buildings all took damage, some more than others. Building 7 was damaged enough to cause a structural failure.

Go get a hobby.

Normal protective measures could not be used as with regular controlled demolitions. Have you ever witnessed a controlled demolition of a high rise building take place? Also nanotechnology was in play (my opinion Ripple Technology, not the crypto), this explains the tons of steel flying through air and tons of concrete pulverized. Massive steel beams turned to molten lasting for months. I can speak of the steel structure and the 4 inch thickness of fireproofing surrounding each beam and gilder along with the rebar reinforced tons of concrete in WTC 7. I was a first hand witness as I worked in the construction of the building from early September 1985 to the topping off in early 1987. I was one of the first people on site after the completion of the foundation. Out of curiosity I tested the fireproofing with an oxygen acetylene torch which I'm very adept at. Barely a spark bounced off. When WTC 7 came down in 10 or so seconds I instantly know that America was attacked from within.  NIST's final conclusion was that WTC 7 collapsed due to fires, what a load of crap.

Ah ripple Nonotechnology, not crypto nanotechnology. Now I'm convinced.

GTP

Quote from: Eamonnca1 on September 13, 2024, 05:14:38 PM
Quote from: GTP on September 13, 2024, 04:09:27 PMIf you intended to bring down the buildings using controlled explosions why not simply drive a large truck into the underground car park with a bomb and use it as a decoy. Covering up one form of demolition by using a completely different method i.e. flying a plane into the building seems overly complex.   

Because they already tried something similar eight years before and it didn't work.

1993 World Trade Center bombing

The tinfoil hat crowd would simply point to the 1993 bombings and say it couldn't have worked.
Forgot about that you could nearly believe that terrorists learned from this attack and came up with something more deadly for 9/11.

Milltown Row2

Quote from: GTP on September 13, 2024, 06:34:13 PM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on September 13, 2024, 05:14:38 PM
Quote from: GTP on September 13, 2024, 04:09:27 PMIf you intended to bring down the buildings using controlled explosions why not simply drive a large truck into the underground car park with a bomb and use it as a decoy. Covering up one form of demolition by using a completely different method i.e. flying a plane into the building seems overly complex.   

Because they already tried something similar eight years before and it didn't work.

1993 World Trade Center bombing

The tinfoil hat crowd would simply point to the 1993 bombings and say it couldn't have worked.
Forgot about that you could nearly believe that terrorists learned from this attack and came up with something more deadly for 9/11.

Was at and up the WT Center that summer, security was tight getting in but I told the security it's ok, I'm from Belfast  ;)

Did notice some Jews with clipboards cameras and timer's hanging out of their shawls
None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought. Ea

theskull1

This anti semite thought Israel got away with cold blooded murder.

Robert McNamara supported the conclusion (taking the word of the attackers rather than those on the ship) that the attack of USS Liberty was not intentional

It's a lot easier to sing karaoke than to sing opera

johnnycool

911 conspiracy theories aside what I find strangest is that they went and invaded Afghanistan when all along these lads were almost to a man Saudis...Hardline Wahhabi Islamists.

Why not invade Saudi Arabia?


J70

#306
Quote from: johnnycool on Today at 05:24:09 PM911 conspiracy theories aside what I find strangest is that they went and invaded Afghanistan when all along these lads were almost to a man Saudis...Hardline Wahhabi Islamists.

Why not invade Saudi Arabia?



I guess the logic was that the hijackers were affiliated with Al Qaeda, who were hosted by the Taliban, not the Saudi government.

And then you obviously throw in the oil market and the ties between certain Saudis and certain Americans.

The Afghan war is not seen as controversial in the US.

The Iraq war now is, including, ironically, by much of the right, despite them using it as a massive electoral and cultural cudgel against the left for 15 years. Remember freedom fries, Hans Blix, "cheese-eating surrender monkeys" (the French), John Kerry "looks French" (I shit you not - Fox News was pushing this). The utter hatred directed towards the Dixie Chicks, Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan etc?

Makes you wonder if they'll look back with regret at Trump by the time we get to 2040. Although I'm not sure any of them actually "regret" their rhetoric and conduct concerning the Iraq war.

Gabriel_Hurl

Quote from: theskull1 on September 13, 2024, 10:38:43 AMI'm with Seamus

Who was it asked about the biggest tinfoil hat wearer?

Milltown Row2

There's a cracking documentary on Netflix at the minute

Turning point the bomb and Cold War

Of course there will be certain views people will look at and rubbish it but I find it more informative that stuff I've read or seen before.

I'm up to the mid 60's at the minute.

It's understandable why there is a tin hat brigade out there because most espionage during that time was misinformation.

That said I still can't see that imaginary planes were missiles disguised as planes were used to bring down the Towers
None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought. Ea