Messages

What a complete strawman argument..... ashamed 

All of your points can be true but completely irrelevant if the US wants to use said country as their proxy to weaken their sworn enemy in a drawn out conflict.
I'm arguing that thats what the US (and Europe) is doing and Ukrainians are paying a very heavy price sadly. I don't have to love Russia to hold this view.

Evil bastards

https://x.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/1795394332004086037?t=0Qb1T0xKQqAyVMi5htOItA&s=19

Will you be proud to send our sons and daughters to the Russian front lads? Powers that be want to move us away from remaining neutral (see Barry Andrews MEP 2022 Doc)

https://x.com/ClareDalyMEP/status/1795114969433850030?t=oOd5jB-LpFA_JuEoE9hm-w&s=19

The US (and whoever is influencing their politicians) has involved themselves in too many wars, coups, proxy wars for me
 (it's endless) to believe anything that supports their narrative. Paranoia can be a healthy defensive position to take against outside threats, so it's not surprising to me they reacted. The lack of diplomatic engagement efforts by the west has been striking to me.   
   
Would never call any side intrinsically good.

Maybe you need to question your world view for a minute.

Every westernized country in the world moved in lock step with very similar policies and the shutting down of dissenting voices. It's not unreasonable to look for common denominators and I see this as a valid one to question. Is here something inaccurate about the information in the tweet?

Same is happening with the US and Euro leadership siding with Israel's blatant genocide in Gaza. Should I be embarrassed to point out the amount of effort AIPAC lobby go to to get their candidate elected to the corridors of power?

No acknowledgement that bringing an army up to a border (after years of US backed revolution and conflict in that said country) is an act of aggression. 

One side good ..... the other side bad

One side good ... other side bad.
NATO can come right up to Russia's border and it shouldn't ever be seen as an act of aggression.
One side good ... other side bad.

Your caricatured description of 'do your own researchers' Lubo is laughable.

The majority of 'do you're own researchers' suspend belief of anything/anybody until they spend time consuming information from multiple unaligned sources before taking a position and even then keep an open view.

On this topic I listen to the thinking of Glenn Greenwald (System Update), Jeffrey Sachs & John Mearsheimer mainly and compare this to what the main stream want me to think. 

Do your own research folks

Brought back this topic because it's pertinent IMO. These fckers have us under a spell that many still need to wake up from


https://x.com/LetsGoBrando45/status/1791359735423471700?t=7g_XOYdNQDA1gXEi8bnyhg&s=19

People should look up (i.e do your own research) Jewish journalist Max Blumenthal on Twitter. Lubo thinks you shouldn't swallow his bullshit hook, line and sinker.

I'm not sure he's right 

Deadly strike on Rafah a tragic mishap, Netanyahu says MSM (actually it hasnt even happened on MSNBC)

I believe them

If you consider mainstream media trustworthy, I can see that being the case.

Everyone completely comfortable with the dichotomous notion that one side is the goodie and the other side the baddie here?

I'm not

How terrorists formed a nation

https://x.com/RyLiberty/status/1721553999281934540?t=Y2pL9qSNIFcUMctjcSvS0A&s=19

Let's all live in a world where we don't consider any possibility of intelligence agencies infiltrating opposition groups.