All Ireland club football championships 2023/24

[Oso]

Pissing off Oso... tick
Glen, best team Ireland... tick

Pissing me off? Aye alright, you're not even on the radar wee man.  You're very quick to throw in your referees view on most things in here but  it doesn't surprise me you missed any of those points , I've seen you in action.

Not on your radar but mentioned me in your post about the game? Wise up wee man

Because you're a referee, as you like to remind everyone and offer your opinion on most decisions from your armchair.  I asked you to justify or explain the decisions? Can you not justify them, or did you miss them? 

[trailer]

The best footballing team by a mile lost yesterday.  Lots of posters who bigged Glen up taking a totally different tact now.....off day...missed so many chances...got over the line.  They were made to look average.

Glen not being efficient in front of goal has been an issue all along....they don't have any natural footballing or scoring forwards.  I've highlight this before. 

St Brigids will kick themselves, they gave 2 really bad goals away. The first one, one of the defenders could have lifted it, but he toe poked it on the ground straight to mcguckian and then the keeper did his best to dive out of the way.

The goal as the end was another goalkeeping howler but was pretty cynical from Glen. Mcguckian fouled the defender that goes down with cramp to stop a counter attack as Glen have big players in advanced positions including Glass. Why did the ref no allow the cramp to be treated as it was directly caused by a Glen tackle which he deemed a free?? Wtf is that about? He then forces the St Brigids player to take the free with his team mate out of action and on the ground and his tea with a numerical disadvantage???   I get that you don't hold up play for cramp but when it's as a direct consequence of a foul??

The free immediately afterwards for the alleged foul on the glen player, who literally put the ball under his arm and charged as if he was heading for the try line was another bizarre decision.

Warnock was roasted, anyone touting him for the Derry set up needs a reality check, but why wasn't he carded for dragging the st Brigids player back when clean though in goal on the first half, when O'Carroll missed chance following the offload. Maybe the esteemed MR2 can explain some of these refereeing decisions? But he'll likely cop out as that's his style. That's 1-1 for Glen direct from bad ref calls between 58th and 60th minute...just not good enough at that level.

And the final act of the much lauded champions was a black card to drag a player down and stop him advancing any further than the 45 for the last kick of the game.   As cynical as it gets.

Football didn't win yesterday.   

Armagh levels of saltiness. Love it. LOVE IT.

[Armagh18]

The best footballing team by a mile lost yesterday.  Lots of posters who bigged Glen up taking a totally different tact now.....off day...missed so many chances...got over the line.  They were made to look average.

Glen not being efficient in front of goal has been an issue all along....they don't have any natural footballing or scoring forwards.  I've highlight this before. 

St Brigids will kick themselves, they gave 2 really bad goals away. The first one, one of the defenders could have lifted it, but he toe poked it on the ground straight to mcguckian and then the keeper did his best to dive out of the way.

The goal as the end was another goalkeeping howler but was pretty cynical from Glen. Mcguckian fouled the defender that goes down with cramp to stop a counter attack as Glen have big players in advanced positions including Glass. Why did the ref no allow the cramp to be treated as it was directly caused by a Glen tackle which he deemed a free?? Wtf is that about? He then forces the St Brigids player to take the free with his team mate out of action and on the ground and his tea with a numerical disadvantage???   I get that you don't hold up play for cramp but when it's as a direct consequence of a foul??

The free immediately afterwards for the alleged foul on the glen player, who literally put the ball under his arm and charged as if he was heading for the try line was another bizarre decision.

Warnock was roasted, anyone touting him for the Derry set up needs a reality check, but why wasn't he carded for dragging the st Brigids player back when clean though in goal on the first half, when O'Carroll missed chance following the offload. Maybe the esteemed MR2 can explain some of these refereeing decisions? But he'll likely cop out as that's his style. That's 1-1 for Glen direct from bad ref calls between 58th and 60th minute...just not good enough at that level.

And the final act of the much lauded champions was a black card to drag a player down and stop him advancing any further than the 45 for the last kick of the game.   As cynical as it gets.

Football didn't win yesterday.   

Armagh levels of saltiness. Love it. LOVE IT.

Ah we aren't that bad!

[Milltown Row2]

Pissing off Oso... tick
Glen, best team Ireland... tick

Pissing me off? Aye alright, you're not even on the radar wee man.  You're very quick to throw in your referees view on most things in here but  it doesn't surprise me you missed any of those points , I've seen you in action.

Not on your radar but mentioned me in your post about the game? Wise up wee man

Because you're a referee, as you like to remind everyone and offer your opinion on most decisions from your armchair.  I asked you to justify or explain the decisions? Can you not justify them, or did you miss them? 

Did you give opinions? Not sure if you have ever played before, but in the rules you don't stop the play for cramp, now if the player had have went down and held his head the ref may have done something different. Also the player taking the free didn't have to take it right away, could have held up, might have made the ref give a throw ball but it might not have ended up with the ball in the net.

A bit of cuteness and Glen could have lost the game, but in the end they (Naomh Brid) were the masters of their own downfall and lost the game.

I've said on another thread that the ref was grand, couldn't really fault him too much, the hurling ref, not so much.

As I said before, I'll be at a hell of a lot more games than you will ever be at

[quit yo jibbajabba]

You forgot wee man. But carry on 🤝😜

[seafoid]

"They will be remembered by their people" - the Follower, Donegal Democrat

https://twitter.com/Doiregaa/status/1749139115591733581

[Hoof Hearted]

The Bellaghy man in that photo landed up yesterday to Maghera with a few of his 1972 mates.

[seafoid]

This is really interesting

1. The 1993 Ulster final
Scullion's  block narrated by Enda Gormley (Wattys)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTpxHxtJ6z4&t=111s

2. Enda Gormley takes over the boys from the estate from age 14 and tells them they have something special

3. https://twitter.com/GCallaghan8/status/1749525391167869366

[Oso]

Pissing off Oso... tick
Glen, best team Ireland... tick

Pissing me off? Aye alright, you're not even on the radar wee man.  You're very quick to throw in your referees view on most things in here but  it doesn't surprise me you missed any of those points , I've seen you in action.

Not on your radar but mentioned me in your post about the game? Wise up wee man

Because you're a referee, as you like to remind everyone and offer your opinion on most decisions from your armchair.  I asked you to justify or explain the decisions? Can you not justify them, or did you miss them? 

Did you give opinions? Not sure if you have ever played before, but in the rules you don't stop the play for cramp, now if the player had have went down and held his head the ref may have done something different. Also the player taking the free didn't have to take it right away, could have held up, might have made the ref give a throw ball but it might not have ended up with the ball in the net.

A bit of cuteness and Glen could have lost the game, but in the end they (Naomh Brid) were the masters of their own downfall and lost the game.

I've said on another thread that the ref was grand, couldn't really fault him too much, the hurling ref, not so much.

As I said before, I'll be at a hell of a lot more games than you will ever be at

I know all of this... Everyone knows this about cramp....but as I specifically said the Glen player fouled the St Brigids player and in the process of fouling him this resulted in cramp....presumably fatigue and over stretching and getting dragged. 

The ref acknowledged the foul, gave the free but didn't allow the St Brigids player to be treated for cramp even though by giving the free he acknowledged what caused the cramp.  He wasn't faking, he couldn't get up and needed treatment.  The ref then forces St Brigids to take the free even though they are at a numerical disadvantage as a direct consequence of the foul that's just been committed against them?? 

Where's the logic or fairness in any of that??

You didn't answer my question? You just regurgitated what we all know.  Did you not see it from your armchair?  Or do you not understand what I'm asking?  The foul caused the cramp....why then is the player not allowed to be treated in an instance like this and why should the referee force st Brigids to take the free with a man down even though the foul resulted in they man being down?

I'm not sure how much clearer I can be. Do you not know the answer??

"Masters of their own downfall" for being forced to take a free with a man lying on the ground as a consequence of the foul.  Jesus wept

[trueblue1234]

Pissing off Oso... tick
Glen, best team Ireland... tick

Pissing me off? Aye alright, you're not even on the radar wee man.  You're very quick to throw in your referees view on most things in here but  it doesn't surprise me you missed any of those points , I've seen you in action.

Not on your radar but mentioned me in your post about the game? Wise up wee man

Because you're a referee, as you like to remind everyone and offer your opinion on most decisions from your armchair.  I asked you to justify or explain the decisions? Can you not justify them, or did you miss them? 

Did you give opinions? Not sure if you have ever played before, but in the rules you don't stop the play for cramp, now if the player had have went down and held his head the ref may have done something different. Also the player taking the free didn't have to take it right away, could have held up, might have made the ref give a throw ball but it might not have ended up with the ball in the net.

A bit of cuteness and Glen could have lost the game, but in the end they (Naomh Brid) were the masters of their own downfall and lost the game.

I've said on another thread that the ref was grand, couldn't really fault him too much, the hurling ref, not so much.

As I said before, I'll be at a hell of a lot more games than you will ever be at

I know all of this... Everyone knows this about cramp....but as I specifically said the Glen player fouled the St Brigids player and in the process of fouling him this resulted in cramp....presumably fatigue and over stretching and getting dragged. 

The ref acknowledged the foul, gave the free but didn't allow the St Brigids player to be treated for cramp even though by giving the free he acknowledged what caused the cramp.  He wasn't faking, he couldn't get up and needed treatment.  The ref then forces St Brigids to take the free even though they are at a numerical disadvantage as a direct consequence of the foul that's just been committed against them?? 

Where's the logic or fairness in any of that??

You didn't answer my question? You just regurgitated what we all know.  Did you not see it from your armchair?  Or do you not understand what I'm asking?  The foul caused the cramp....why then is the player not allowed to be treated in an instance like this and why should the referee force st Brigids to take the free with a man down even though the foul resulted in they man being down?

I'm not sure how much clearer I can be. Do you not know the answer??

"Masters of their own downfall" for being forced to take a free with a man lying on the ground as a consequence of the foul.  Jesus wept

Far from me to stand up for MR2 but considering he is actually a ref your armchair comments are slightly strange. Surely he is less of an armchair ref than the rest of us windbags who don't walk the walk. Unless your going to tell me your a ref?

[Milltown Row2]

Pissing off Oso... tick
Glen, best team Ireland... tick

Pissing me off? Aye alright, you're not even on the radar wee man.  You're very quick to throw in your referees view on most things in here but  it doesn't surprise me you missed any of those points , I've seen you in action.

Not on your radar but mentioned me in your post about the game? Wise up wee man

Because you're a referee, as you like to remind everyone and offer your opinion on most decisions from your armchair.  I asked you to justify or explain the decisions? Can you not justify them, or did you miss them? 

Did you give opinions? Not sure if you have ever played before, but in the rules you don't stop the play for cramp, now if the player had have went down and held his head the ref may have done something different. Also the player taking the free didn't have to take it right away, could have held up, might have made the ref give a throw ball but it might not have ended up with the ball in the net.

A bit of cuteness and Glen could have lost the game, but in the end they (Naomh Brid) were the masters of their own downfall and lost the game.

I've said on another thread that the ref was grand, couldn't really fault him too much, the hurling ref, not so much.

As I said before, I'll be at a hell of a lot more games than you will ever be at

I know all of this... Everyone knows this about cramp....but as I specifically said the Glen player fouled the St Brigids player and in the process of fouling him this resulted in cramp....presumably fatigue and over stretching and getting dragged. 

The ref acknowledged the foul, gave the free but didn't allow the St Brigids player to be treated for cramp even though by giving the free he acknowledged what caused the cramp.  He wasn't faking, he couldn't get up and needed treatment.  The ref then forces St Brigids to take the free even though they are at a numerical disadvantage as a direct consequence of the foul that's just been committed against them?? 

Where's the logic or fairness in any of that??

You didn't answer my question? You just regurgitated what we all know.  Did you not see it from your armchair?  Or do you not understand what I'm asking?  The foul caused the cramp....why then is the player not allowed to be treated in an instance like this and why should the referee force st Brigids to take the free with a man down even though the foul resulted in they man being down?

I'm not sure how much clearer I can be. Do you not know the answer??

"Masters of their own downfall" for being forced to take a free with a man lying on the ground as a consequence of the foul.  Jesus wept

I've played many years, never before have I seen or heard of someone getting fouled and developing cramp, he was fouled and his teammate took the free

I'll say it one more time, and maybe your pea sized brain will understand, head injury stop play, cramp play on.

All the other stuff is irrelevant, Naomh Brid lost the game because the scored less than Glen over the course of the match, not because of a player having cramp.

Move on..

[quit yo jibbajabba]

This is the depths Oso has sunk us to, we're finding ourselves sticking up for MR2. God I hate him

[RedHand88]

Did an ex girlfriend from Maghera cheat on you Oso or what's the reason for the bitterness?

[Would ye whist]

Not to stick up for Oso (albeit he is great value), however it is usual and advised I have been told when a player is injured, any kind of injury and their is a break in the the ref should not restart to the player is treated. The ref only has to stop the game during play if it is a head injury. Can I check if that is correct MR2? 

Pissing off Oso... tick
Glen, best team Ireland... tick

Pissing me off? Aye alright, you're not even on the radar wee man.  You're very quick to throw in your referees view on most things in here but  it doesn't surprise me you missed any of those points , I've seen you in action.

Not on your radar but mentioned me in your post about the game? Wise up wee man

Because you're a referee, as you like to remind everyone and offer your opinion on most decisions from your armchair.  I asked you to justify or explain the decisions? Can you not justify them, or did you miss them? 

Did you give opinions? Not sure if you have ever played before, but in the rules you don't stop the play for cramp, now if the player had have went down and held his head the ref may have done something different. Also the player taking the free didn't have to take it right away, could have held up, might have made the ref give a throw ball but it might not have ended up with the ball in the net.

A bit of cuteness and Glen could have lost the game, but in the end they (Naomh Brid) were the masters of their own downfall and lost the game.

I've said on another thread that the ref was grand, couldn't really fault him too much, the hurling ref, not so much.

As I said before, I'll be at a hell of a lot more games than you will ever be at

I know all of this... Everyone knows this about cramp....but as I specifically said the Glen player fouled the St Brigids player and in the process of fouling him this resulted in cramp....presumably fatigue and over stretching and getting dragged. 

The ref acknowledged the foul, gave the free but didn't allow the St Brigids player to be treated for cramp even though by giving the free he acknowledged what caused the cramp.  He wasn't faking, he couldn't get up and needed treatment.  The ref then forces St Brigids to take the free even though they are at a numerical disadvantage as a direct consequence of the foul that's just been committed against them?? 

Where's the logic or fairness in any of that??

You didn't answer my question? You just regurgitated what we all know.  Did you not see it from your armchair?  Or do you not understand what I'm asking?  The foul caused the cramp....why then is the player not allowed to be treated in an instance like this and why should the referee force st Brigids to take the free with a man down even though the foul resulted in they man being down?

I'm not sure how much clearer I can be. Do you not know the answer??

"Masters of their own downfall" for being forced to take a free with a man lying on the ground as a consequence of the foul.  Jesus wept

I've played many years, never before have I seen or heard of someone getting fouled and developing cramp, he was fouled and his teammate took the free

I'll say it one more time, and maybe your pea sized brain will understand, head injury stop play, cramp play on.

All the other stuff is irrelevant, Naomh Brid lost the game because the scored less than Glen over the course of the match, not because of a player having cramp.

Move on..

[Oso]

Pissing off Oso... tick
Glen, best team Ireland... tick

Pissing me off? Aye alright, you're not even on the radar wee man.  You're very quick to throw in your referees view on most things in here but  it doesn't surprise me you missed any of those points , I've seen you in action.

Not on your radar but mentioned me in your post about the game? Wise up wee man

Because you're a referee, as you like to remind everyone and offer your opinion on most decisions from your armchair.  I asked you to justify or explain the decisions? Can you not justify them, or did you miss them? 

Did you give opinions? Not sure if you have ever played before, but in the rules you don't stop the play for cramp, now if the player had have went down and held his head the ref may have done something different. Also the player taking the free didn't have to take it right away, could have held up, might have made the ref give a throw ball but it might not have ended up with the ball in the net.

A bit of cuteness and Glen could have lost the game, but in the end they (Naomh Brid) were the masters of their own downfall and lost the game.

I've said on another thread that the ref was grand, couldn't really fault him too much, the hurling ref, not so much.

As I said before, I'll be at a hell of a lot more games than you will ever be at

I know all of this... Everyone knows this about cramp....but as I specifically said the Glen player fouled the St Brigids player and in the process of fouling him this resulted in cramp....presumably fatigue and over stretching and getting dragged. 

The ref acknowledged the foul, gave the free but didn't allow the St Brigids player to be treated for cramp even though by giving the free he acknowledged what caused the cramp.  He wasn't faking, he couldn't get up and needed treatment.  The ref then forces St Brigids to take the free even though they are at a numerical disadvantage as a direct consequence of the foul that's just been committed against them?? 

Where's the logic or fairness in any of that??

You didn't answer my question? You just regurgitated what we all know.  Did you not see it from your armchair?  Or do you not understand what I'm asking?  The foul caused the cramp....why then is the player not allowed to be treated in an instance like this and why should the referee force st Brigids to take the free with a man down even though the foul resulted in they man being down?

I'm not sure how much clearer I can be. Do you not know the answer??

"Masters of their own downfall" for being forced to take a free with a man lying on the ground as a consequence of the foul.  Jesus wept

Far from me to stand up for MR2 but considering he is actually a ref your armchair comments are slightly strange. Surely he is less of an armchair ref than the rest of us windbags who don't walk the walk. Unless your going to tell me your a ref?

Armchair in that he is an expert on teams he's never actually seen play.  He does go to games, when he gets expenses as a ref.  Way too tight to actually pay into a game.