Silence in court!
In the case of ITOB versus Sky Blue, I have reflected on this case and find for the Defendant ITOB.
The subject in the picture is too young too read, does not use the internet and will be unrecognisable when it grows up, and therefore will not suffer unduely. The picture was not taken by ITOB, who simply posted it for the pleasure of GAA Board posters, a roguish lot, but well able to differentiate between obscene material and humour (or valid attempts at humour).
Indeed barrister MagicKingdom added a valid point that Wobblers cartoon is much more offensive yet nobody seems to mind.
I also refer readers to paragraph 4, section5 (1) (b) of Schedule 1 in the GAA Board Act which does not exist.
The Plaintiff Sky Blue shall pay all court costs and do two hours community service, working as a comedian in a strip club of his/her choice. And don’t even think of appealing.
Lord Chief Justice Orior of Ard Mhacha.