The Fine Gael thread

Started by Maguire01, October 16, 2012, 08:14:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

foxcommander

Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 06:08:00 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 05:26:11 PM
Quote from: macdanger2 on February 19, 2016, 05:09:57 PM
To increase tax take and to broaden the tax base. AFAIK, it was a troika "recommendation"

I presume you have some other more elaborate reason to tell me about.....

And why the need to increase the tax take?
Because the country was running a deficit.

And why was that?
Every second of the day there's a Democrat telling a lie

Maguire01

Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 06:11:58 PM
Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 06:08:00 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 05:26:11 PM
Quote from: macdanger2 on February 19, 2016, 05:09:57 PM
To increase tax take and to broaden the tax base. AFAIK, it was a troika "recommendation"

I presume you have some other more elaborate reason to tell me about.....

And why the need to increase the tax take?
Because the country was running a deficit.

And why was that?
You tell me.

foxcommander

Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 06:24:31 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 06:11:58 PM
Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 06:08:00 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 05:26:11 PM
Quote from: macdanger2 on February 19, 2016, 05:09:57 PM
To increase tax take and to broaden the tax base. AFAIK, it was a troika "recommendation"

I presume you have some other more elaborate reason to tell me about.....

And why the need to increase the tax take?
Because the country was running a deficit.

And why was that?
You tell me.

Lads, could you help out Maguire?



errrrrrrrr
Every second of the day there's a Democrat telling a lie

Rossfan

Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 06:24:31 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 06:11:58 PM
Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 06:08:00 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 05:26:11 PM
Quote from: macdanger2 on February 19, 2016, 05:09:57 PM
To increase tax take and to broaden the tax base. AFAIK, it was a troika "recommendation"

I presume you have some other more elaborate reason to tell me about.....

And why the need to increase the tax take?
Because the country was running a deficit.

And why was that?
You tell me.

Public Financing for the IQ challenged ;D
Should ask Gerry Adams - he can abolish loads of taxes  AND improve public services plus provide instant public health care for all, hire 20,000 public employees and build thousands of houses :o
Davy's given us a dream to cling to
We're going to bring home the SAM

foxcommander

Quote from: Rossfan on February 19, 2016, 07:17:55 PM
Public Financing for the IQ challenged


You might want to take some English lessons  :-*
Every second of the day there's a Democrat telling a lie

mikehunt

Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 06:34:45 PM
Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 06:24:31 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 06:11:58 PM
Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 06:08:00 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 05:26:11 PM
Quote from: macdanger2 on February 19, 2016, 05:09:57 PM
To increase tax take and to broaden the tax base. AFAIK, it was a troika "recommendation"

I presume you have some other more elaborate reason to tell me about.....

And why the need to increase the tax take?
Because the country was running a deficit.

And why was that?
You tell me.

Lads, could you help out Maguire?



errrrrrrrr

Because Ireland Inc were borrowing at 6.5% and lending to the Irish elite at 1.5%. Taxpayers through new charges were footung the bill for the difference.

foxcommander

Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 07:36:30 PM

Because Ireland Inc were borrowing at 6.5% and lending to the Irish elite at 1.5%. Taxpayers through new charges were footung the bill for the difference.


Awww Mike - I was waiting for Maguire to tell me that. I got so close too.
Spoil my fun why don't you.
Every second of the day there's a Democrat telling a lie

mikehunt

Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 07:36:30 PM

Because Ireland Inc were borrowing at 6.5% and lending to the Irish elite at 1.5%. Taxpayers through new charges were footung the bill for the difference.


Awww Mike - I was waiting for Maguire to tell me that. I got so close too.
Spoil my fun why don't you.
Ah now Commander you know you'd be waiting for Maguire to answer a tricky question about FG's record in govt.  Keep the recovery going is the best you'll get out of him.

Hardy

Is the answer, "seven... ehhhh seven... around fifty nine"?

Maguire01

Ireland was spending more than it was taking in. Its income was reliant on a narrow tax base and exposed to the property crash. Tax therefore had to be increased, and / or expenditure cut, to balance. It also made sense that the tax base was broadened.

Maguire01

Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 08:40:20 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 07:36:30 PM

Because Ireland Inc were borrowing at 6.5% and lending to the Irish elite at 1.5%. Taxpayers through new charges were footung the bill for the difference.


Awww Mike - I was waiting for Maguire to tell me that. I got so close too.
Spoil my fun why don't you.
Ah now Commander you know you'd be waiting for Maguire to answer a tricky question about FG's record in govt.  Keep the recovery going is the best you'll get out of him.
I don't believe i've said that once.

foxcommander

Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 08:40:20 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 07:36:30 PM

Because Ireland Inc were borrowing at 6.5% and lending to the Irish elite at 1.5%. Taxpayers through new charges were footung the bill for the difference.


Awww Mike - I was waiting for Maguire to tell me that. I got so close too.
Spoil my fun why don't you.
Ah now Commander you know you'd be waiting for Maguire to answer a tricky question about FG's record in govt.  Keep the recovery going is the best you'll get out of him.

I know, I know. Maguire will just keep regurgitating the buzzwords.

Even Enda finds his manifesto it hard to believe. The cover says "Less waste, Lower Taxes, Stronger Growth".

Or is that a fairytale book?


Every second of the day there's a Democrat telling a lie

mikehunt

Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 09:09:39 PM
Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 08:40:20 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 07:36:30 PM

Because Ireland Inc were borrowing at 6.5% and lending to the Irish elite at 1.5%. Taxpayers through new charges were footung the bill for the difference.


Awww Mike - I was waiting for Maguire to tell me that. I got so close too.
Spoil my fun why don't you.
Ah now Commander you know you'd be waiting for Maguire to answer a tricky question about FG's record in govt.  Keep the recovery going is the best you'll get out of him.
I don't believe i've said that once.
There are quite a lot of things you haven't said. Like your opinion on state sponsored debt write downs to the elite? Do you think this helped narrow the deficit?

Maguire01

Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 10:22:36 PM
Quote from: Maguire01 on February 19, 2016, 09:09:39 PM
Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 08:40:20 PM
Quote from: foxcommander on February 19, 2016, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: mikehunt on February 19, 2016, 07:36:30 PM

Because Ireland Inc were borrowing at 6.5% and lending to the Irish elite at 1.5%. Taxpayers through new charges were footung the bill for the difference.


Awww Mike - I was waiting for Maguire to tell me that. I got so close too.
Spoil my fun why don't you.
Ah now Commander you know you'd be waiting for Maguire to answer a tricky question about FG's record in govt.  Keep the recovery going is the best you'll get out of him.
I don't believe i've said that once.
There are quite a lot of things you haven't said. Like your opinion on state sponsored debt write downs to the elite? Do you think this helped narrow the deficit?
So if you haven't explicitly said you're disagree with something, you must agree with it? Well I don't. And no, it hardly helped narrow the deficit. But changes to taxes and public expenditure were still going to be required. Hence the likes of property tax.

Rossfan

Property taxes and charges for public water/sewerage -  a feature of most modern European social democracies.
Brought in here as a result of the Troika bail out caused by HarneyMcCreevyist neo liberalism which narrowed the tax base to house building taxes on artificially inflated prices for houses nobody needed and nobody could afford.
Davy's given us a dream to cling to
We're going to bring home the SAM