gaaboard.com

Non GAA Discussion => General discussion => Topic started by: trailer on September 09, 2022, 09:24:07 PM

Poll
Question: Will you be watching the Coronation of King Charles III
Option 1: Yes
Option 2: No
Option 3: Who is King Charles?
Option 4: What about Diana the People's Princess?
Title: King Charles III
Post by: trailer on September 09, 2022, 09:24:07 PM
A thread to discuss all things Royal.

God Save The King

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Olly on September 09, 2022, 09:48:54 PM
Does this mean that after Charlie there'll be King Billy? If that's the case, a great chance of a reenactment of the Boyne for reality tv etc.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: WT4E on September 09, 2022, 10:42:52 PM
Lock this thread
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 10, 2022, 10:35:30 AM
Someone is the Prince of Wales. Someone else is the Duke of Edinburgh. Why is there no Prince of Strabane ?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: tintin25 on September 10, 2022, 10:42:13 AM
Bank Holiday approved
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: smort on September 10, 2022, 10:59:17 AM
I know a lot of this is ridiculous, but this mornings ceremony is particularly ridiculous
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Itchy on September 10, 2022, 11:32:41 AM
My deepest condolences to everyone in Fine Gael at this difficult time.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: nrico2006 on September 10, 2022, 12:03:57 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 10, 2022, 10:35:30 AM
Someone is the Prince of Wales. Someone else is the Duke of Edinburgh. Why is there no Prince of Strabane ?

Only kings in Strabane.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: fearsiuil on September 10, 2022, 12:26:18 PM
Quote from: Itchy on September 10, 2022, 11:32:41 AM
My deepest condolences to everyone in Fine Gael at this difficult time.
Funny but very true. Facebook posts expressing sympathy to Bessie's family by people I know...and even worse the amount of likes it harvests. c***ts the lot of them.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Eamonnca1 on September 10, 2022, 06:08:22 PM
Och let the unionists have their moment. She wasn't the worst. Sure she visited Croke Park and spoke a cĂșpla focail, didn't she?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 10, 2022, 06:09:14 PM
Quote from: smort on September 10, 2022, 10:59:17 AM
I know a lot of this is ridiculous, but this mornings ceremony is particularly ridiculous
Jesus Jeffrey Donaldson was looking even more smug than usual
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on September 10, 2022, 06:23:22 PM
Was badger beard in London today swearing his allegiance to their king?

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 10, 2022, 06:26:45 PM
Bank holiday confirmed.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 10, 2022, 06:37:43 PM

Great News

In the days before his mother's funeral, King Charles III and his wife, Queen Camilla, will travel to Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales.

The first stop will be Scotland, where they will visit the Scottish parliament and join a vigil in memory of the monarch.

On Tuesday, the royal couple will travel by air to Belfast and visit Hillsborough Castle, where they will view an exhibition on the Queen's long association with Northern Ireland.

They will also attend a service in memory of the Queen and receive a message of condolence led by the speaker of the Northern Ireland Assembly.

After returning to London, where they will witness the arrival of Queen Elizabeth II's coffin, the couple will travel to Wales on Friday.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Orior on September 10, 2022, 07:10:20 PM
In the meantime, cost of living crisis goes on hold, the iniquitous protocol fix goes on hold, and of course the assembly executive goes on hold. Oh wait
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: imtommygunn on September 10, 2022, 07:39:47 PM
Sure there isn't a speaker of the Northern Ireland assembly? Tbh this shouldn't be allowed then you'd see how quick the dup would nominate a speaker.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 10, 2022, 08:04:47 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on September 10, 2022, 07:39:47 PM
Sure there isn't a speaker of the Northern Ireland assembly? Tbh this shouldn't be allowed then you'd see how quick the dup would nominate a speaker.

I disagree, SF are playing a blinder. Let the DUP and Unionists have their days of mourning. The moral high ground is were this battle will be won.

And you all know my views on SF!
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Eamonnca1 on September 10, 2022, 11:59:30 PM
Quote from: trailer on September 10, 2022, 08:04:47 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on September 10, 2022, 07:39:47 PM
Sure there isn't a speaker of the Northern Ireland assembly? Tbh this shouldn't be allowed then you'd see how quick the dup would nominate a speaker.

I disagree, SF are playing a blinder. Let the DUP and Unionists have their days of mourning. The moral high ground is were this battle will be won.

And you all know my views on SF!

I agree. You know full well the next fortnight's going to be full of all manner of pomp and ceremony and hand-wringing. You're not going to stop it, there's no point in giving out about it. It'll all be back to business as usual soon enough, so let them tear away.

We used to have orange parades past our house all the time, and our approach was to just shut the curtains and never let on we saw them. It was all over in a minute or two and nobody passed any remarks. The protestant neighbours stood out and watched it, the fenians all stayed indoors and carried on washing the dishes, making a sandwich, or whatever it was we were doing at the time. Don't give them the satisfaction of any negative reaction.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: RedHand88 on September 11, 2022, 08:33:06 AM
Quote from: trailer on September 10, 2022, 08:04:47 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on September 10, 2022, 07:39:47 PM
Sure there isn't a speaker of the Northern Ireland assembly? Tbh this shouldn't be allowed then you'd see how quick the dup would nominate a speaker.

I disagree, SF are playing a blinder. Let the DUP and Unionists have their days of mourning. The moral high ground is were this battle will be won.

And you all know my views on SF!

There was an internal email sent round warning them to behave themselves.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: snoopdog on September 11, 2022, 10:21:36 AM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on September 10, 2022, 11:59:30 PM
Quote from: trailer on September 10, 2022, 08:04:47 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on September 10, 2022, 07:39:47 PM
Sure there isn't a speaker of the Northern Ireland assembly? Tbh this shouldn't be allowed then you'd see how quick the dup would nominate a speaker.

I disagree, SF are playing a blinder. Let the DUP and Unionists have their days of mourning. The moral high ground is were this battle will be won.

And you all know my views on SF!

I agree. You know full well the next fortnight's going to be full of all manner of pomp and ceremony and hand-wringing. You're not going to stop it, there's no point in giving out about it. It'll all be back to business as usual soon enough, so let them tear away.

We used to have orange parades past our house all the time, and our approach was to just shut the curtains and never let on we saw them. It was all over in a minute or two and nobody passed any remarks. The protestant neighbours stood out and watched it, the fenians all stayed indoors and carried on washing the dishes, making a sandwich, or whatever it was we were doing at the time. Don't give them the satisfaction of any negative reaction.
Fully agree. Thr whole Bonfire thing every year would soon go away. If they were ignored for a few years  the bonfires would dramatically reduce in size and probably numbers.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 11, 2022, 01:51:14 PM
The Shinners are playing a long game

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-michelle-oneill-will-attend-events-during-king-charles-northern-ireland-visit-41979940.html
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 11, 2022, 01:56:47 PM
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/king-charles-visit-to-northern-ireland-everything-you-need-to-know-ahead-of-monarchs-arrival-41979965.html
"Before the service, the King will meet leaders from all the major faiths in Northern Ireland."

Presumably this includes Armagh fans who believe that Armagh deserve at least 3 all Stars.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Armagh18 on September 11, 2022, 04:54:45 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 11, 2022, 01:51:14 PM
The Shinners are playing a long game

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-michelle-oneill-will-attend-events-during-king-charles-northern-ireland-visit-41979940.html
They've lost my vote.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Armagh18 on September 11, 2022, 04:56:50 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 11, 2022, 01:56:47 PM
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/king-charles-visit-to-northern-ireland-everything-you-need-to-know-ahead-of-monarchs-arrival-41979965.html
"Before the service, the King will meet leaders from all the major faiths in Northern Ireland."

Presumably this includes Armagh fans who believe that Armagh deserve at least 3 all Stars.
2 will do :)
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 11, 2022, 05:20:38 PM
Quote from: Armagh18 on September 11, 2022, 04:54:45 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 11, 2022, 01:51:14 PM
The Shinners are playing a long game

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-michelle-oneill-will-attend-events-during-king-charles-northern-ireland-visit-41979940.html
They've lost my vote.

Just now? Not all the other times they acknowledged British rule in NI? McGuinness?

Weird.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: theskull1 on September 11, 2022, 10:04:51 PM
NEWS FLASH
Prince Andrew to care for Queen's beloved corgis

Thanks BBC  ::)
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: armaghniac on September 11, 2022, 10:46:13 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 11, 2022, 01:51:14 PM
The Shinners are playing a long game

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-michelle-oneill-will-attend-events-during-king-charles-northern-ireland-visit-41979940.html

They have made a distinction between memorials for the deceased Queen and those involving the new King. This seems relatively wise.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 11, 2022, 10:58:20 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 11, 2022, 10:46:13 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 11, 2022, 01:51:14 PM
The Shinners are playing a long game

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-michelle-oneill-will-attend-events-during-king-charles-northern-ireland-visit-41979940.html

They have made a distinction between memorials for the deceased Queen and those involving the new King. This seems relatively wise.

Stoops
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: mrdeeds on September 11, 2022, 11:00:55 PM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 11, 2022, 10:04:51 PM
NEWS FLASH
Prince Andrew to care for Queen's beloved corgis

Thanks BBC  ::)

Makes sense. Has grooming experience.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: RedHand88 on September 11, 2022, 11:14:47 PM
Quote from: mrdeeds on September 11, 2022, 11:00:55 PM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 11, 2022, 10:04:51 PM
NEWS FLASH
Prince Andrew to care for Queen's beloved corgis

Thanks BBC  ::)

Makes sense. Has grooming experience.

Congratulations, you win the Internet today.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: AustinPowers on September 11, 2022, 11:27:11 PM
All that pagentry , trumpeters , silly outfits , etc...... I can't help thinking of Lord Farquaad in Shrek

But there was an excuse  there, as it was an animation.

God it's mad ,all that  centuries old nonsense
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Armagh18 on September 11, 2022, 11:27:44 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 11, 2022, 10:58:20 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 11, 2022, 10:46:13 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 11, 2022, 01:51:14 PM
The Shinners are playing a long game

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-michelle-oneill-will-attend-events-during-king-charles-northern-ireland-visit-41979940.html

They have made a distinction between memorials for the deceased Queen and those involving the new King. This seems relatively wise.

Stoops
Yep. Disgraceful.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: armaghniac on September 11, 2022, 11:55:19 PM
Quote from: Armagh18 on September 11, 2022, 11:27:44 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 11, 2022, 10:58:20 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 11, 2022, 10:46:13 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 11, 2022, 01:51:14 PM
The Shinners are playing a long game

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-michelle-oneill-will-attend-events-during-king-charles-northern-ireland-visit-41979940.html

They have made a distinction between memorials for the deceased Queen and those involving the new King. This seems relatively wise.

Stoops
Yep. Disgraceful.

you go to your neighbour's funeral and related events and you do not define the format
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Eamonnca1 on September 12, 2022, 12:23:25 AM
Quote from: mrdeeds on September 11, 2022, 11:00:55 PM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 11, 2022, 10:04:51 PM
NEWS FLASH
Prince Andrew to care for Queen's beloved corgis

Thanks BBC  ::)

Makes sense. Has grooming experience.

Quality!
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Eamonnca1 on September 12, 2022, 12:25:06 AM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 11, 2022, 11:27:11 PM
All that pagentry , trumpeters , silly outfits , etc...... I can't help thinking of Lord Farquaad in Shrek

But there was an excuse  there, as it was an animation.

God it's mad ,all that  centuries old nonsense

It works though. Creates a big emotional state in the crowd. It's all a big show designed to manipulate people's emotions and get them swept up in patriotism.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 12, 2022, 07:34:33 AM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on September 12, 2022, 12:25:06 AM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 11, 2022, 11:27:11 PM
All that pagentry , trumpeters , silly outfits , etc...... I can't help thinking of Lord Farquaad in Shrek

But there was an excuse  there, as it was an animation.

God it's mad ,all that  centuries old nonsense

It works though. Creates a big emotional state in the crowd. It's all a big show designed to manipulate people's emotions and get them swept up in patriotism.

Why are you actually watching it? It's mad that you'd put yourself through such a thing and then comment on it!

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 12, 2022, 08:33:11 AM
On a more important note, anyone notice how fat the fingers are on KCIII?

(https://i2-prod.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/incoming/article27232617.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200b/0_EaZpdb2XgAIO2HNjfif.jpg)

What's going on there?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: quit yo jibbajabba on September 12, 2022, 08:59:04 AM
Id say Camilla has wink wink nod nod say no more
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 12, 2022, 09:01:36 AM
Quote from: quit yo jibbajabba on September 12, 2022, 08:59:04 AM
Id say Camilla has wink wink nod nod say no more

Strange that he zoomed in on his fingers lol. But yeah I'd say Camila is happy enough with his fingers
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Wildweasel74 on September 12, 2022, 09:17:38 AM
Circulation issues,
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 12, 2022, 09:22:26 AM
Quote from: Wildweasel74 on September 12, 2022, 09:17:38 AM
Circulation issues,

I'd say most people in their 70's will have some circulation issues, the aul sherry's don't help
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 12, 2022, 10:08:55 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-62871441

The process is almost complete
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 12, 2022, 10:20:00 AM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 12, 2022, 10:08:55 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-62871441

The process is almost complete
Jesus you really are a one trick pony
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Rossfan on September 12, 2022, 10:22:08 AM
I see a Fionnuala Mary O'Boyle is "Lord Lieutenant of Belfast".
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 12, 2022, 10:25:39 AM
Quote from: mrdeeds on September 11, 2022, 11:00:55 PM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 11, 2022, 10:04:51 PM
NEWS FLASH
Prince Andrew to care for Queen's beloved corgis

Thanks BBC  ::)

Makes sense. Has grooming experience.
Brilliant
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: tbrick18 on September 12, 2022, 10:26:18 AM
Quote from: mrdeeds on September 11, 2022, 11:00:55 PM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 11, 2022, 10:04:51 PM
NEWS FLASH
Prince Andrew to care for Queen's beloved corgis

Thanks BBC  ::)

Makes sense. Has grooming experience.

Brilliant!
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 12, 2022, 10:57:32 AM
Not on...

If people want to sit at home and grieve for Lizzy, but to go out and sabotage an event takes some doing;;

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/northern-ireland/62861072 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/northern-ireland/62861072)
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 12, 2022, 11:36:44 AM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 12, 2022, 10:20:00 AM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 12, 2022, 10:08:55 AM
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-62871441

The process is almost complete
Jesus you really are a one trick pony

Neigh
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: toby47 on September 12, 2022, 12:42:59 PM
Are most work places in the North taking next Monday as a bank holiday?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 12:49:14 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on September 12, 2022, 10:57:32 AM
Not on...

If people want to sit at home and grieve for Lizzy, but to go out and sabotage an event takes some doing;;

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/northern-ireland/62861072 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/northern-ireland/62861072)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5rRZdiu1UE
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: gallsman on September 12, 2022, 01:56:23 PM
Quote from: toby47 on September 12, 2022, 12:42:59 PM
Are most work places in the North taking next Monday as a bank holiday?

A mate who works in BCC was telling me that anyone who works the bank holiday is getting double time and time in lieu. f**king madness.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 12, 2022, 02:06:09 PM
Quote from: gallsman on September 12, 2022, 01:56:23 PM
Quote from: toby47 on September 12, 2022, 12:42:59 PM
Are most work places in the North taking next Monday as a bank holiday?

A mate who works in BCC was telling me that anyone who works the bank holiday is getting double time and time in lieu. f**king madness.

West Belfast schools off, citing buses not available due to reduced services  ;)
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 12, 2022, 02:13:11 PM
Quote from: gallsman on September 12, 2022, 01:56:23 PM
Quote from: toby47 on September 12, 2022, 12:42:59 PM
Are most work places in the North taking next Monday as a bank holiday?

A mate who works in BCC was telling me that anyone who works the bank holiday is getting double time and time in lieu. f**king madness.

lol, class
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: gallsman on September 12, 2022, 02:50:08 PM
One or the other I get. Why people need to be doubly compensated I will never understand. Pissing ratepayer money up the wall.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 12, 2022, 03:08:48 PM
The NHS have some decisions to make. Will appointments be cancelled-i hope not
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 12, 2022, 03:21:06 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 12, 2022, 03:08:48 PM
The NHS have some decisions to make. Will appointments be cancelled-i hope not

The hospitals are still open, I assume local surgeries are closed though
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 12, 2022, 04:05:38 PM
Quote from: toby47 on September 12, 2022, 12:42:59 PM
Are most work places in the North taking next Monday as a bank holiday?

Absolutely. Fair play to Lizzy. Two bonus bank holidays in the one year.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: quit yo jibbajabba on September 12, 2022, 04:46:00 PM
Shes played a blinder tbf. Cheers Liz

And theres no way Charlie lasts 70yrs so lookin forward to another one in the next 20yrs 😉
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: laoislad on September 12, 2022, 04:46:56 PM
Quote from: quit yo jibbajabba on September 12, 2022, 04:46:00 PM
Shes played a blinder tbf. Cheers Liz

And theres no way Charlie lasts 70yrs so lookin forward to another one in the next 20yrs 😉
A true Irishman would go to work anyways.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Armagh18 on September 12, 2022, 04:47:04 PM
Quote from: quit yo jibbajabba on September 12, 2022, 04:46:00 PM
Shes played a blinder tbf. Cheers Liz

And theres no way Charlie lasts 70yrs so lookin forward to another one in the next 20yrs 😉
5? 10?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: theskull1 on September 12, 2022, 05:12:52 PM
Wonder if the establishment will make him another JP the 1st to get the youngster into the job?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on September 12, 2022, 05:22:17 PM
Quote from: laoislad on September 12, 2022, 04:46:56 PM
Quote from: quit yo jibbajabba on September 12, 2022, 04:46:00 PM
Shes played a blinder tbf. Cheers Liz

And theres no way Charlie lasts 70yrs so lookin forward to another one in the next 20yrs 😉
A true Irishman would go to work anyways.

I'm planning to. Take them off another time!!
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Eamonnca1 on September 12, 2022, 05:39:51 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 12, 2022, 07:34:33 AM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on September 12, 2022, 12:25:06 AM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 11, 2022, 11:27:11 PM
All that pagentry , trumpeters , silly outfits , etc...... I can't help thinking of Lord Farquaad in Shrek

But there was an excuse  there, as it was an animation.

God it's mad ,all that  centuries old nonsense

It works though. Creates a big emotional state in the crowd. It's all a big show designed to manipulate people's emotions and get them swept up in patriotism.

Why are you actually watching it? It's mad that you'd put yourself through such a thing and then comment on it!

Why do you assume I watched it? I never looked near it.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 12, 2022, 06:08:42 PM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 12, 2022, 05:12:52 PM
Wonder if the establishment will make him another JP the 1st to get the youngster into the job?
Can you explain please?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: armaghniac on September 12, 2022, 06:14:29 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 12, 2022, 06:08:42 PM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 12, 2022, 05:12:52 PM
Wonder if the establishment will make him another JP the 1st to get the youngster into the job?
Can you explain please?

JP the First of Rome had a short reign, as I recall and was found dead.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 06:27:31 PM
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-alex-maskey-to-deliver-message-to-king-from-the-people-of-northern-ireland-41981215.html

The King and Queen Consort will receive a message of condolence from self-declared "lifelong republican activist" Alex Maskey at Hillsborough Castle tomorrow.
As Stormont Speaker, the former IRA internee has been tasked with delivering the message on behalf of the people of Northern Ireland, on which it is understood King Charles III will respond.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 12, 2022, 06:38:33 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 12, 2022, 06:14:29 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 12, 2022, 06:08:42 PM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 12, 2022, 05:12:52 PM
Wonder if the establishment will make him another JP the 1st to get the youngster into the job?
Can you explain please?

JP the First of Rome had a short reign, as I recall and was found dead.
Aw right. Thanks for explaining that
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 06:54:52 PM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 12, 2022, 05:12:52 PM
Wonder if the establishment will make him another JP the 1st to get the youngster into the job?
Charlie has waited too long to let the job pass over  to someone else.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 07:17:34 PM
https://www.ft.com/content/9eb10ed0-8e78-4fc7-91ec-688a5032ee20
To make reunification a reality, O'Neill must win over those from a unionist background, or at least assuage them that she is no threat.
"I have to find ways in which to ensure that those of a British identity feel protected. Is it going to be smooth? No, of course not."
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Harold Disgracey on September 12, 2022, 09:11:50 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 07:17:34 PM
https://www.ft.com/content/9eb10ed0-8e78-4fc7-91ec-688a5032ee20
To make reunification a reality, O'Neill must win over those from a unionist background, or at least assuage them that she is no threat.
"I have to find ways in which to ensure that those of a British identity feel protected. Is it going to be smooth? No, of course not."

Paywall free version
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcontent%2F9eb10ed0-8e78-4fc7-91ec-688a5032ee20
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 07:59:51 AM
Bonnie Prince Charlie would have been Charles III.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 13, 2022, 10:01:09 AM
Quote from: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 07:17:34 PM
https://www.ft.com/content/9eb10ed0-8e78-4fc7-91ec-688a5032ee20
To make reunification a reality, O'Neill must win over those from a unionist background, or at least assuage them that she is no threat.
"I have to find ways in which to ensure that those of a British identity feel protected. Is it going to be smooth? No, of course not."

SDLP for slow learners
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 11:00:22 AM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 13, 2022, 10:01:09 AM
Quote from: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 07:17:34 PM
https://www.ft.com/content/9eb10ed0-8e78-4fc7-91ec-688a5032ee20
To make reunification a reality, O'Neill must win over those from a unionist background, or at least assuage them that she is no threat.
"I have to find ways in which to ensure that those of a British identity feel protected. Is it going to be smooth? No, of course not."

SDLP for slow learners
Funny old world
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 13, 2022, 12:32:15 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 11:00:22 AM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 13, 2022, 10:01:09 AM
Quote from: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 07:17:34 PM
https://www.ft.com/content/9eb10ed0-8e78-4fc7-91ec-688a5032ee20
To make reunification a reality, O'Neill must win over those from a unionist background, or at least assuage them that she is no threat.
"I have to find ways in which to ensure that those of a British identity feel protected. Is it going to be smooth? No, of course not."

SDLP for slow learners
Funny old world

Stoops
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 13, 2022, 01:21:07 PM
Watched a bit of Charley at Hillsborough there on UTV/ITV and they talked an awful lot about the Shinners being the largest party, the damage Brexit has done to the peace process, the impending census results and what that could mean in terms of the UK and Charley not being King over here.

I think they can expect complaints from the DUP if they or someone sees it.

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 13, 2022, 01:46:25 PM
Is Alex Maskey  for real?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 13, 2022, 02:09:41 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 13, 2022, 01:46:25 PM
Is Alex Maskey  for real?

I can't imagine this will play well with the SF base.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on September 13, 2022, 02:10:04 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 13, 2022, 01:46:25 PM
Is Alex Maskey  for real?

Expand? In what way?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Itchy on September 13, 2022, 02:14:00 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 06:27:31 PM
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-alex-maskey-to-deliver-message-to-king-from-the-people-of-northern-ireland-41981215.html

The King and Queen Consort will receive a message of condolence from self-declared "lifelong republican activist" Alex Maskey at Hillsborough Castle tomorrow.
As Stormont Speaker, the former IRA internee has been tasked with delivering the message on behalf of the people of Northern Ireland, on which it is understood King Charles III will respond.

How many of you have gone to the funeral of someone you didnt like and pass on your condolences? The fact is that 50% of the people in the North have a loyalty to the Monarchy. I think its stupid but thats just me. If you want to govern all the people you cannot just disrespect 50% of them - even if you know in your heart that if the shoe was on the other foot....
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: markl121 on September 13, 2022, 02:16:30 PM
Quote from: Itchy on September 13, 2022, 02:14:00 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 06:27:31 PM
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-alex-maskey-to-deliver-message-to-king-from-the-people-of-northern-ireland-41981215.html

The King and Queen Consort will receive a message of condolence from self-declared "lifelong republican activist" Alex Maskey at Hillsborough Castle tomorrow.
As Stormont Speaker, the former IRA internee has been tasked with delivering the message on behalf of the people of Northern Ireland, on which it is understood King Charles III will respond.

How many of you have gone to the funeral of someone you didnt like and pass on your condolences? The fact is that 50% of the people in the North have a loyalty to the Monarchy. I think its stupid but thats just me. If you want to govern all the people you cannot just disrespect 50% of them - even if you know in your heart that if the shoe was on the other foot....
And this is why we should rise above it
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Itchy on September 13, 2022, 02:18:07 PM
Quote from: markl121 on September 13, 2022, 02:16:30 PM
Quote from: Itchy on September 13, 2022, 02:14:00 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 06:27:31 PM
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-alex-maskey-to-deliver-message-to-king-from-the-people-of-northern-ireland-41981215.html

The King and Queen Consort will receive a message of condolence from self-declared "lifelong republican activist" Alex Maskey at Hillsborough Castle tomorrow.
As Stormont Speaker, the former IRA internee has been tasked with delivering the message on behalf of the people of Northern Ireland, on which it is understood King Charles III will respond.

How many of you have gone to the funeral of someone you didnt like and pass on your condolences? The fact is that 50% of the people in the North have a loyalty to the Monarchy. I think its stupid but thats just me. If you want to govern all the people you cannot just disrespect 50% of them - even if you know in your heart that if the shoe was on the other foot....
And this is why we should rise above it

Exactly. Sinn Fein are playing the only game they can and if people dont see that then they are truly just thick.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: yellowcard on September 13, 2022, 02:29:56 PM
Personally I have absolutely no interest in all that pomp, ceremony and servitude and all that the monarchy historically represents. But you have to distinguish between politicians who are elected to serve the people and individuals acting in a personal capacity. SF were elected to represent the people, half of whom are of British identity and most of whom will have an attachment to the monarchy. So I think it was the right thing to do since we have moved on from the generation of the troubles, despite the best efforts of some agitators to try and drag us back. The Royals might be dysfunctional in plenty of instances but they have done a lot more than many UK politicians in recent times to unite people on this island and that has to be respected.     
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: clarshack on September 13, 2022, 02:32:10 PM
For the Star Wars fans here:

https://twitter.com/20thcenturymarc/status/1569310683140964358
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 02:38:23 PM
If I were a Scottish nationalist I would hate the pomp and the symbolism of Scottish capture such as the crown and the Royal Standard and Bonnie Prince Charlie's tartan.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 02:59:32 PM
Prince Andrew was dressed in the equivalent of his pyjamas when the siblings were standing around the coffin on Sunday.
He will probably never recapture his reputation.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 13, 2022, 03:37:45 PM
Quote from: Itchy on September 13, 2022, 02:18:07 PM
Quote from: markl121 on September 13, 2022, 02:16:30 PM
Quote from: Itchy on September 13, 2022, 02:14:00 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 06:27:31 PM
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-alex-maskey-to-deliver-message-to-king-from-the-people-of-northern-ireland-41981215.html

The King and Queen Consort will receive a message of condolence from self-declared "lifelong republican activist" Alex Maskey at Hillsborough Castle tomorrow.
As Stormont Speaker, the former IRA internee has been tasked with delivering the message on behalf of the people of Northern Ireland, on which it is understood King Charles III will respond.

How many of you have gone to the funeral of someone you didnt like and pass on your condolences? The fact is that 50% of the people in the North have a loyalty to the Monarchy. I think its stupid but thats just me. If you want to govern all the people you cannot just disrespect 50% of them - even if you know in your heart that if the shoe was on the other foot....
And this is why we should rise above it

Exactly. Sinn Fein are playing the only game they can and if people dont see that then they are truly just thick.

You cant have it both ways , a lot of SF supporters never see the hypocrisy of how they treat others who have been doing the same for years. Calling people thick is typical of the bullying , school play ground type within SF support.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 13, 2022, 03:40:16 PM
Quote from: markl121 on September 13, 2022, 02:16:30 PM
Quote from: Itchy on September 13, 2022, 02:14:00 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 12, 2022, 06:27:31 PM
https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/sinn-feins-alex-maskey-to-deliver-message-to-king-from-the-people-of-northern-ireland-41981215.html

The King and Queen Consort will receive a message of condolence from self-declared "lifelong republican activist" Alex Maskey at Hillsborough Castle tomorrow.
As Stormont Speaker, the former IRA internee has been tasked with delivering the message on behalf of the people of Northern Ireland, on which it is understood King Charles III will respond.

How many of you have gone to the funeral of someone you didnt like and pass on your condolences? The fact is that 50% of the people in the North have a loyalty to the Monarchy. I think its stupid but thats just me. If you want to govern all the people you cannot just disrespect 50% of them - even if you know in your heart that if the shoe was on the other foot....
And this is why we should rise above it

Well rise above it properly then and go to westminster, sure we are sick hearing how "stormont have no fiscal powers"
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: skeog on September 13, 2022, 03:41:35 PM
Poor Jeff looked lost arms folded not happy Michelle top dog.Alex playing a blinder imo.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 13, 2022, 03:50:07 PM
Quote from: skeog on September 13, 2022, 03:41:35 PM
Poor Jeff looked lost arms folded not happy Michelle top dog.Alex playing a blinder imo.

he said on radio ulster he was delighted, so not sure what you are on about, in his view everyone was now towing the line
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: skeog on September 13, 2022, 03:56:17 PM
Bun lighten up if you think Jeff is happy that he is No 2 your delusional.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 04:03:48 PM
Quote from: skeog on September 13, 2022, 03:41:35 PM
Poor Jeff looked lost arms folded not happy Michelle top dog.Alex playing a blinder imo.
Unbelievable, Jeff.
O'Neill is playing senior hurling.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: gallsman on September 13, 2022, 04:21:49 PM
Centre Parcs in UK closing all their locations on Monday at 10am
On holiday with them or due to arrive on Monday? Kindly f**k off.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 05:37:16 PM
Quote from: gallsman on September 13, 2022, 04:21:49 PM
Centre Parcs in UK closing all their locations on Monday at 10am
On holiday with them or due to arrive on Monday? Kindly f**k off.
Now wouldn't be peak season in any tourist resort
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: imtommygunn on September 13, 2022, 05:38:03 PM
Ah that's ok then...
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Rossfan on September 13, 2022, 05:44:26 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 04:03:48 PM
Quote from: skeog on September 13, 2022, 03:41:35 PM
Poor Jeff looked lost arms folded not happy Michelle top dog.Alex playing a blinder imo.
Unbelievable, Jeff.
O'Neill is playing senior hurling.
Shinners being all grown up and adult.
Meanwhile Charlie Windsor quizzed Donaldson about DUPUDA's stance on the Protocol. Probably walked away wondering what will they be when they grow up.. ...
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 05:49:11 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on September 13, 2022, 05:38:03 PM
Ah that's ok then...
It was probably an easier decision. Just as well she didn't die in August.
I bet punters will be rehoused elsewhere.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: RedHand88 on September 13, 2022, 08:52:11 PM
Have to say, Charles praising Sinn Fein for "all their skill and ingenuity" at becoming the biggest party infront of Jeffrey is the moment of the day.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Farrandeelin on September 13, 2022, 09:24:56 PM
Quote from: RedHand88 on September 13, 2022, 08:52:11 PM
Have to say, Charles praising Sinn Fein for "all their skill and ingenuity" at becoming the biggest party infront of Jeffrey is the moment of the day.

Maskey's "don't tell Jeffrey now" class. ;D
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Sportacus on September 13, 2022, 09:35:49 PM
Sinn Fein have completely silenced the DUP.  Haven't given them an inch to be bitter about.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Farrandeelin on September 13, 2022, 09:43:21 PM
Quote from: Sportacus on September 13, 2022, 09:35:49 PM
Sinn Fein have completely silenced the DUP.  Haven't given them an inch to be bitter about.
They must be seething.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 13, 2022, 09:44:28 PM
Parity of esteem .

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/incoming/a58de/41985674.ece/AUTOCROP/w1240/1243193640.jpg
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Hereiam on September 13, 2022, 11:23:06 PM
This really couldn't have worked out any worse for Unionists/Loyalist over here, the will be raging that SF are the largest Party when Lizzie died and get to meet Charlie before them.
Its all symbolism with them and the optics certainly don't look good for them from the outside world looking in.

Rub it up them.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 14, 2022, 07:29:08 AM
Will MON get an invite to the actual funeral?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: LeoMc on September 14, 2022, 08:00:54 AM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 14, 2022, 07:29:08 AM
Will MON get an invite to the actual funeral?
Yes and she will be attending. Reported yesterday evening by Tracey Magee.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 14, 2022, 08:17:38 AM
Quote from: Farrandeelin on September 13, 2022, 09:24:56 PM
Quote from: RedHand88 on September 13, 2022, 08:52:11 PM
Have to say, Charles praising Sinn Fein for "all their skill and ingenuity" at becoming the biggest party infront of Jeffrey is the moment of the day.

Maskey's "don't tell Jeffrey now" class. ;D
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fckcec0WAAAC2IJ?format=jpg&name=small)
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 14, 2022, 08:59:11 AM
SF have now become the SDLP. They are on the same constitutional nationalist ground that Hume and Mallon et all occupied for so long. If this was the SF end game you have to wonder what it was all about. They clearly accept that NI is part of the UK until there is a democratic vote to change that. They are happy to administer British law.

How will there base see this? Stoops? Sell outs? Playing a blinder? Sinn Fein - SDLP for slow learners.

The DUP have once again played a bad hand badly and have been totally side lined in an event that is so dear to their hearts. How will their base respond? Problem is that similarly on the Nationalist side their is no alternative. The UUP nor the SDLP are resonating with voters. 


Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: gallsman on September 14, 2022, 09:25:50 AM
Good Lord, even CoI lads are at it. Trying to close for food banks and businesses in Dungiven.

https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2022/09/14/news/church_of_ireland_minister_urges_free_food_facility_to_close_for_queen_elizabeth_s_funeral-2827538/?s=08
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 10:11:07 AM
Quote from: trailer on September 14, 2022, 08:59:11 AM
SF have now become the SDLP. They are on the same constitutional nationalist ground that Hume and Mallon et all occupied for so long. If this was the SF end game you have to wonder what it was all about. They clearly accept that NI is part of the UK until there is a democratic vote to change that. They are happy to administer British law.

How will there base see this? Stoops? Sell outs? Playing a blinder? Sinn Fein - SDLP for slow learners.

The DUP have once again played a bad hand badly and have been totally side lined in an event that is so dear to their hearts. How will their base respond? Problem is that similarly on the Nationalist side their is no alternative. The UUP nor the SDLP are resonating with voters.

Loads of men looking into pints depressed wondering the same.

If you look at recent republican funerals here in Derry its very telling, most of the lads that done the work on the ground dont appear anymore. What was it all about
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Keyboard Warrior on September 14, 2022, 10:14:16 AM
Quote from: trailer on September 14, 2022, 08:59:11 AM
SF have now become the SDLP. They are on the same constitutional nationalist ground that Hume and Mallon et all occupied for so long. If this was the SF end game you have to wonder what it was all about. They clearly accept that NI is part of the UK until there is a democratic vote to change that. They are happy to administer British law.

How will there base see this? Stoops? Sell outs? Playing a blinder? Sinn Fein - SDLP for slow learners.

The DUP have once again played a bad hand badly and have been totally side lined in an event that is so dear to their hearts. How will their base respond? Problem is that similarly on the Nationalist side their is no alternative. The UUP nor the SDLP are resonating with voters.

Fair to say that SF are no longer Republicans now? Impossible to reconcile calling yourself a Republican (democratically elected head of state, written constitution etc.) and then kowtow to monarchy.

PBP made their objections to monarchy clear in a respectful way.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Pub Bore on September 14, 2022, 10:17:07 AM
As far as political strategies go, a masterclass by SF.  They gently nudged the DUP off centre stage.  It's telling that the SDLP supporters here are far more angry than most unionists.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 14, 2022, 10:18:16 AM
Quote from: Keyboard Warrior on September 14, 2022, 10:14:16 AM
Quote from: trailer on September 14, 2022, 08:59:11 AM
SF have now become the SDLP. They are on the same constitutional nationalist ground that Hume and Mallon et all occupied for so long. If this was the SF end game you have to wonder what it was all about. They clearly accept that NI is part of the UK until there is a democratic vote to change that. They are happy to administer British law.

How will there base see this? Stoops? Sell outs? Playing a blinder? Sinn Fein - SDLP for slow learners.

The DUP have once again played a bad hand badly and have been totally side lined in an event that is so dear to their hearts. How will their base respond? Problem is that similarly on the Nationalist side their is no alternative. The UUP nor the SDLP are resonating with voters.

Fair to say that SF are no longer Republicans now? Impossible to reconcile calling yourself a Republican (democratically elected head of state, written constitution etc.) and then kowtow to monarchy.

PBP made their objections to monarchy clear in a respectful way.

It's all about appeasing the small u unionists that their culture will be protected/acknowledged in a UI.

Michelle et all are probably in their mind treating KC as a foreign dignitary albeit someone that a very large part of the local electorate have an affinity with.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 14, 2022, 10:23:24 AM
Quote from: Pub Bore on September 14, 2022, 10:17:07 AM
As far as political strategies go, a masterclass by SF.  They gently nudged the DUP off centre stage.  It's telling that the SDLP supporters here are far more angry than most unionists.

SDLP supporters are far from angry and I have actually praised SF. (uncomfortable for you) But I ask two questions. What took them so long? And what will the hardliners think?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Rossfan on September 14, 2022, 10:44:13 AM
They accepted the 6 Cos remaining part of the "UK" unless/until voters decide otherwise in 1998 when they negotiated the GFA.
The more moderate they become the more votes they get.
People are mainly moderate and centrist.
Can you imagine how many seats they'd get in the next DĂĄil if they ran on a 32 County Socialist Republic, nationalise big business, get out of the EU etc platform?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 14, 2022, 10:52:16 AM
Quote from: Rossfan on September 14, 2022, 10:44:13 AM
They accepted the 6 Cos remaining part of the "UK" unless/until voters decide otherwise in 1998 when they negotiated the GFA.
The more moderate they become the more votes they get.
People are mainly moderate and centrist.
Can you imagine how many seats they'd get in the next DĂĄil if they ran on a 32 County Socialist Republic, nationalise big business, get out of the EU etc platform?

Not very many.
But that is who they are. Voters need to be careful.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Pub Bore on September 14, 2022, 11:17:48 AM
Quote from: trailer on September 14, 2022, 10:23:24 AM
Quote from: Pub Bore on September 14, 2022, 10:17:07 AM
As far as political strategies go, a masterclass by SF.  They gently nudged the DUP off centre stage.  It's telling that the SDLP supporters here are far more angry than most unionists.

SDLP supporters are far from angry and I have actually praised SF. (uncomfortable for you) But I ask two questions. What took them so long? And what will the hardliners think?

What took them so long? - Well the Queen only died last week, so they've moved fairly quickly. ;)
What will the hardliners think?.  - Dunno, I suppose some will not be amused, but I'm sure SF planned for this and the vast majority of SF voters will be on board, at least to the extent where it won't stop them voting for SF.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 11:21:29 AM
I think they're lapping it up. The fact that the Unionists are having to take a back seat is brilliant. MON getting an invite to the funeral and Jim Allister not is icing on cake
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Denn Forever on September 14, 2022, 11:34:55 AM
Would Jim Allister accept accept the invition f MON said that she couldn't accept the invitation in all good conscience and maybe :-she would give it to Jim?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: keep her low this half on September 14, 2022, 11:41:57 AM
Perhaps SF are finally working to win a border poll. Which policy would win the most wavering votes in a future border poll, boycotting all the ceremonies and shouting FTQ or paying respect to the deceased head of state of a neighbouring country?
I think SF and MON have performed very well this week in what could easily have been an awkward moment.
As for the diehard republicans criticizing them, some of them have done time for fighting crown forces and will be feeling  betrayed but realistically when a border poll is called each and every one of them will vote in favour of a united Ireland, just not for SF in any election that follows which is fair enough.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on September 14, 2022, 11:44:02 AM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 11:21:29 AM
I think they're lapping it up. The fact that the Unionists are having to take a back seat is brilliant. MON getting an invite to the funeral and Jim Allister not is icing on cake

I watched about 10/15 mins of the bit at Hillsborough yesterday. I'd probably only have seen about 10/15 mins of news before that. I thought it was hard not to laugh at wee Jeff and Jim playing second-fiddle especially when it involved something they idolise. I think the SF stance has been well played. As someone mentioned earlier it was simply paying respect to a foreign dignitary after a death. No more, no less. I can't see how that somehow makes them full-on Royalists now or changes their stance on a United Ireland. The same lads here complaining about them meeting Charlie would be the same ones complaining if they didn't.

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 14, 2022, 11:45:03 AM
Quote from: Denn Forever on September 14, 2022, 11:34:55 AM
Would Jim Allister accept accept the invition f MON said that she couldn't accept the invitation in all good conscience and maybe :-she would give it to Jim?

Met by Alex Maskey and Michelle O'Neill in Hillsborough with Alex leading the condolences and Michelle first in line, then onto St Annes Cathedral to be met by the SF Mayor of Belfast and the SF MP for the area.

What must the Royals and the GB audience think is going on over here?

Saw that Steve Baker ERG hoor floating about, should have been taken to the border area and left there...
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 11:48:50 AM
Yeah. SF running the show. They were banned when Lizzy first came over as queen. Who knows what it'll be like when William becomes king. Jamie Bryson has them sussed. He's comparing it with tge false sense of security created in long kesh before the 1983 mass escape
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: armaghniac on September 14, 2022, 11:51:17 AM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 11:48:50 AM
Yeah. SF running the show. They were banned when Lizzy first came over as queen. Who knows what it'll be like when William becomes king. Jamie Bryson has them sussed. He's comparing it with tge false sense of security created in long kesh before the 1983 mass escape

With any luck Charles will be the present when they haul down the Butcher's Apron for the last time.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Denn Forever on September 14, 2022, 11:54:10 AM
SF will now be taking their places in Parliment? 
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 14, 2022, 11:57:53 AM
Quote from: Denn Forever on September 14, 2022, 11:54:10 AM
SF will now be taking their places in Parliment?

There really is no logical reason now that they won't. It is probably the next step. Just like the next step in south is to be a party of government, in a parliament they didn't recognise and boycotted initially ironically. It may have taken 100 odd years but they are now what they often referred to others as - West Brit Stoops.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: armaghniac on September 14, 2022, 12:02:59 PM
Quote from: trailer on September 14, 2022, 11:57:53 AM
Quote from: Denn Forever on September 14, 2022, 11:54:10 AM
SF will now be taking their places in Parliment?

There really is no logical reason now that they won't. It is probably the next step. Just like the next step in south is to be a party of government, in a parliament they didn't recognise and boycotted initially ironically. It may have taken 100 odd years but they are now what they often referred to others as - West Brit Stoops.

If it is United Ireland you want then softly, softly, catchee monkey. 
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 14, 2022, 12:05:13 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 14, 2022, 12:02:59 PM
Quote from: trailer on September 14, 2022, 11:57:53 AM
Quote from: Denn Forever on September 14, 2022, 11:54:10 AM
SF will now be taking their places in Parliment?

There really is no logical reason now that they won't. It is probably the next step. Just like the next step in south is to be a party of government, in a parliament they didn't recognise and boycotted initially ironically. It may have taken 100 odd years but they are now what they often referred to others as - West Brit Stoops.

If it is United Ireland you want then softly, softly, catchee monkey.

Totally agree and this is where other constitutional nationalists have been for years. The only way is to seduce the Unionists and make them feel not threatened by the inevitable change. An Ireland for all.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 12:10:54 PM
Quote from: Denn Forever on September 14, 2022, 11:54:10 AM
SF will now be taking their places in Parliment?


Yes
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 14, 2022, 12:20:06 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 12:10:54 PM
Quote from: Denn Forever on September 14, 2022, 11:54:10 AM
SF will now be taking their places in Parliment?


Yes

Why?

What has Colin and Claire achieved in their time over there?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 12:26:50 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on September 14, 2022, 12:20:06 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 12:10:54 PM
Quote from: Denn Forever on September 14, 2022, 11:54:10 AM
SF will now be taking their places in Parliment?


Yes

Why?

What has Colin and Claire achieved in their time over there?

Sure fiscal power is not fully devolved. Or are SF copping out?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: yellowcard on September 14, 2022, 12:30:08 PM
What we witnessed yesterday is the very reason why the DUP pulled down Stormont in the first place. They couldn't and still can't stomach the thought of playing second fiddle to a nationalist party. The protocol was only ever used as cover to pull the institutions down in advance when they had correctly calculated that they would lose the Stormont election. That in built supremacism on which the northern state was founded will prove their ultimate downfall. Fear, division and hatred are still their main tactics of choice a century on and there is nothing positive or progressive that Unionism can offer in its current guise. Mountbatten himself wished for a united Ireland and it wouldn't surprise me if the current Royals had the same view. Everything they do is choreographed so that audible conversation did not happen by accident.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Snapchap on September 14, 2022, 12:35:29 PM
Quote from: Keyboard Warrior on September 14, 2022, 10:14:16 AM
Quote from: trailer on September 14, 2022, 08:59:11 AM
SF have now become the SDLP. They are on the same constitutional nationalist ground that Hume and Mallon et all occupied for so long. If this was the SF end game you have to wonder what it was all about. They clearly accept that NI is part of the UK until there is a democratic vote to change that. They are happy to administer British law.

How will there base see this? Stoops? Sell outs? Playing a blinder? Sinn Fein - SDLP for slow learners.

The DUP have once again played a bad hand badly and have been totally side lined in an event that is so dear to their hearts. How will their base respond? Problem is that similarly on the Nationalist side their is no alternative. The UUP nor the SDLP are resonating with voters.

Fair to say that SF are no longer Republicans now? Impossible to reconcile calling yourself a Republican (democratically elected head of state, written constitution etc.) and then kowtow to monarchy.

PBP made their objections to monarchy clear in a respectful way.

Did they kowtow? I didn't see any kowtowing. They didn't partake in the ridiculous curtsy caper etc. And they also made their objections to monarchy clear by only attending memorial events but staying away from the succession of the nonsense 'Proclamation' events which took place.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Armagh18 on September 14, 2022, 12:48:52 PM
Quote from: yellowcard on September 14, 2022, 12:30:08 PM
What we witnessed yesterday is the very reason why the DUP pulled down Stormont in the first place. They couldn't and still can't stomach the thought of playing second fiddle to a nationalist party. The protocol was only ever used as cover to pull the institutions down in advance when they had correctly calculated that they would lose the Stormont election. That in built supremacism on which the northern state was founded will prove their ultimate downfall. Fear, division and hatred are still their main tactics of choice a century on and there is nothing positive or progressive that Unionism can offer in its current guise. Mountbatten himself wished for a united Ireland and it wouldn't surprise me if the current Royals had the same view. Everything they do is choreographed so that audible conversation did not happen by accident.
It was funny looking at the DUPers playing second fiddle to be honest.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Truth hurts on September 14, 2022, 12:55:22 PM
Is most places off on Monday? What is the protocol for it as I see most big companies are nearly being shamed into it, are the schools etc closed, if you do not get it off do you get a day in lieu. Its confusing
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Snapchap on September 14, 2022, 01:00:20 PM
Just to throw in my penny's worth as a SF voter...

It will never be comfortable watching SF politicians shaking hands with British monarchs while we remain partitioned, but that being said, it's abundantly clear why they did it. A quick listen to five or ten minutes of Radio Ulster Talkback this afternoon will spell it out. They have been getting lauded from (almost) all directions for how they've handled the last few days - most notably from middle grounders who are the very people that need to be brought on board for what is now an inevitable border poll and like all SF does - it's geared towards a successful border poll.

As I say, I take no pleasure seeing them greet monarchs, but the reality is that it's nothing new nowadays. No existing SF voters are going to get too annoyed today at Michelle O'Neill for shaking a royal's hand. Why would they? She didn't break any new ground. SF politicians, Michelle included, have been meeting british royals for the last ten years ever since Martin McGuinness took the step first back and shook Lizzie's hand in 2012.

Consider too that unionism has been in overdrive trying to be offended by overt displays of nationalism in the past few months (offended at rebel songs, offended at old footage of a garda car in the north, offended at GAA clubs seeking to use council facilities, offended at GAA clubs organising event named after a club member who happened to have the same name as a hunger striker. SF's conduct in the last few days really does sweep the carpet right from under the feet of unionism at a time when it is going out of it's way to find something to be offended by.

Seems to me that SF have had everything to gain and nothing really to lose this last week and that's how they've played it.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 14, 2022, 01:13:42 PM
Quote from: Truth hurts on September 14, 2022, 12:55:22 PM
Is most places off on Monday? What is the protocol for it as I see most big companies are nearly being shamed into it, are the schools etc closed, if you do not get it off do you get a day in lieu. Its confusing

I'm working out of a doctors surgery and they are off, that said we are in Ballymena lol, but the trust gave the go ahead for them the other day, though a colleague of mine in Newry is saying the clinic that he is working out of is open.

Schools are closed al over as far as I know

The company I work for in the North are getting the day off, regardless if they are in a building that is staying open or one we own

I was off anyways as I'm actually in Liverpool, so was able to get that day back from my leave planner  :D

There are local councils asking shops to close or 'encouraging' them to close in some small towns, not surprising

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: RedHand88 on September 14, 2022, 01:18:26 PM
Quote from: Armagh18 on September 14, 2022, 12:48:52 PM
Quote from: yellowcard on September 14, 2022, 12:30:08 PM
What we witnessed yesterday is the very reason why the DUP pulled down Stormont in the first place. They couldn't and still can't stomach the thought of playing second fiddle to a nationalist party. The protocol was only ever used as cover to pull the institutions down in advance when they had correctly calculated that they would lose the Stormont election. That in built supremacism on which the northern state was founded will prove their ultimate downfall. Fear, division and hatred are still their main tactics of choice a century on and there is nothing positive or progressive that Unionism can offer in its current guise. Mountbatten himself wished for a united Ireland and it wouldn't surprise me if the current Royals had the same view. Everything they do is choreographed so that audible conversation did not happen by accident.
It was funny looking at the DUPers playing second fiddle to be honest.

+1.

Jeffrey's "this is my constituency" line smacked of desperation. Like someone desperate for approval from an authority figure.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 14, 2022, 01:20:42 PM
Quote from: Snapchap on September 14, 2022, 01:00:20 PM
Just to throw in my penny's worth as a SF voter...

It will never be comfortable watching SF politicians shaking hands with British monarchs while we remain partitioned, but that being said, it's abundantly clear why they did it. A quick listen to five or ten minutes of Radio Ulster Talkback this afternoon will spell it out. They have been getting lauded from (almost) all directions for how they've handled the last few days - most notably from middle grounders who are the very people that need to be brought on board for what is now an inevitable border poll and like all SF does - it's geared towards a successful border poll.

As I say, I take no pleasure seeing them greet monarchs, but the reality is that it's nothing new nowadays. No existing SF voters are going to get too annoyed today at Michelle O'Neill for shaking a royal's hand. Why would they? She didn't break any new ground. SF politicians, Michelle included, have been meeting british royals for the last ten years ever since Martin McGuinness took the step first back and shook Lizzie's hand in 2012.

Consider too that unionism has been in overdrive trying to be offended by overt displays of nationalism in the past few months (offended at rebel songs, offended at old footage of a garda car in the north, offended at GAA clubs seeking to use council facilities, offended at GAA clubs organising event named after a club member who happened to have the same name as a hunger striker. SF's conduct in the last few days really does sweep the carpet right from under the feet of unionism at a time when it is going out of it's way to find something to be offended by.

Seems to me that SF have had everything to gain and nothing really to lose this last week and that's how they've played it.

For it to really work though that attitude needs to continue from here on in, stick to the core values of course never lose sight of your identity and that will keep SF voters on track, those that are ultra republican are not worth keeping to be fair and with possible new voters coming on board not a bad thing to get rid of ones that could derail all the positivity.

TBF I haven't watched the news so have only seen some images on social media and what's been said here, they have played a blinder
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 01:21:15 PM
Quote from: Snapchap on September 14, 2022, 12:35:29 PM
Quote from: Keyboard Warrior on September 14, 2022, 10:14:16 AM
Quote from: trailer on September 14, 2022, 08:59:11 AM
SF have now become the SDLP. They are on the same constitutional nationalist ground that Hume and Mallon et all occupied for so long. If this was the SF end game you have to wonder what it was all about. They clearly accept that NI is part of the UK until there is a democratic vote to change that. They are happy to administer British law.

How will there base see this? Stoops? Sell outs? Playing a blinder? Sinn Fein - SDLP for slow learners.

The DUP have once again played a bad hand badly and have been totally side lined in an event that is so dear to their hearts. How will their base respond? Problem is that similarly on the Nationalist side their is no alternative. The UUP nor the SDLP are resonating with voters.

Fair to say that SF are no longer Republicans now? Impossible to reconcile calling yourself a Republican (democratically elected head of state, written constitution etc.) and then kowtow to monarchy.

PBP made their objections to monarchy clear in a respectful way.

Did they kowtow? I didn't see any kowtowing. They didn't partake in the ridiculous curtsy caper etc. And they also made their objections to monarchy clear by only attending memorial events but staying away from the succession of the nonsense 'Proclamation' events which took place.

The NI church reflection ceremony -oh how quickly a leopard can change its spots. STOOPS
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 02:01:39 PM
Just as a matter of interest, where do you stand on the constitutional issue, Nationalist, Unionist, Loyalist or Republican?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on September 14, 2022, 02:06:39 PM
I think what the last few days shows is that political unionism in the north is completely leaderless. They cannot cope with being second place and have no way to cope with it. This was to be their year,  the post Covid celebration of the 100 years,  instead they have seen SF become the biggest party, their royal matriarch and the certain of many of their reasons for being loyal gone, SF lording over them at her funeral and a pathetic weasley effort by Jeffrey at yesterdays event. They know the wheel is turning and the pace is picking up. Next week we will see the first sets of data from the census being released....the day after the funeral as things presently stand. That's a data could be huge as the following is to be included in it .... passports held, ethnic group, national identity, language and religion.  Twitter could explode on Tuesday in Donaghadee.....
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: JPGJOHNNYG on September 14, 2022, 02:48:51 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 14, 2022, 02:06:39 PM
I think what the last few days shows is that political unionism in the north is completely leaderless. They cannot cope with being second place and have no way to cope with it. This was to be their year,  the post Covid celebration of the 100 years,  instead they have seen SF become the biggest party, their royal matriarch and the certain of many of their reasons for being loyal gone, SF lording over them at her funeral and a pathetic weasley effort by Jeffrey at yesterdays event. They know the wheel is turning and the pace is picking up. Next week we will see the first sets of data from the census being released....the day after the funeral as things presently stand. That's a data could be huge as the following is to be included in it .... passports held, ethnic group, national identity, language and religion.  Twitter could explode on Tuesday in Donaghadee.....

The community background is the headline figure. I expect Catholic background to remain unchanged or rise only 1% to 46%, however the Protestant background will fall again probably to 43%. Another milestone passed on the way to a border poll.

The added Irish, N.irish,British questions at the last census were only added to muddy the waters but won't hide the demographic change. Even which passport held might be uncomfortable reading for some this time.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 03:00:32 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 02:01:39 PM
Just as a matter of interest, where do you stand on the constitutional issue, Nationalist, Unionist, Loyalist or Republican?

Republican.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 03:01:26 PM
Quote from: JPGJOHNNYG on September 14, 2022, 02:48:51 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 14, 2022, 02:06:39 PM
I think what the last few days shows is that political unionism in the north is completely leaderless. They cannot cope with being second place and have no way to cope with it. This was to be their year,  the post Covid celebration of the 100 years,  instead they have seen SF become the biggest party, their royal matriarch and the certain of many of their reasons for being loyal gone, SF lording over them at her funeral and a pathetic weasley effort by Jeffrey at yesterdays event. They know the wheel is turning and the pace is picking up. Next week we will see the first sets of data from the census being released....the day after the funeral as things presently stand. That's a data could be huge as the following is to be included in it .... passports held, ethnic group, national identity, language and religion.  Twitter could explode on Tuesday in Donaghadee.....

The community background is the headline figure. I expect Catholic background to remain unchanged or rise only 1% to 46%, however the Protestant background will fall again probably to 43%. Another milestone passed on the way to a border poll.

The added Irish, N.irish,British questions at the last census were only added to muddy the waters but won't hide the demographic change. Even which passport held might be uncomfortable reading for some this time.

This will grow-especially with SF antics
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: skeog on September 14, 2022, 03:18:22 PM
Arlene dont close the boiler scheme now bleating about yesterday.What a pathetic bitter woman.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on September 14, 2022, 03:41:44 PM
Quote from: skeog on September 14, 2022, 03:18:22 PM
Arlene dont close the boiler scheme now bleating about yesterday.What a pathetic bitter woman.

What is she slabbering about?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: yellowcard on September 14, 2022, 03:46:56 PM
Quote from: skeog on September 14, 2022, 03:18:22 PM
Arlene dont close the boiler scheme now bleating about yesterday.What a pathetic bitter woman.

Most former politicians tend to stray into the shadows and become more mellow after they leave the stage. Arlene has actually got even more bitter and divisive since she resigned from office. It's almost like she is trying to over compensate to prove her ultra Britishness after her catastrophic leadership that promoted and brought about Brexit itself.

At the risk of repeating myself, it absolutely kills these DUP politicians that they are seen to be playing second fiddle to nationalists when they clearly see themselves as the natural rulers of society here. First minister/ joint first minister doesn't really make much difference to the majority of people but it is something that really grates with their political leaders when they have been used to supremacy since the creation of the state. Listening to Jeffrey Donaldson this morning on the radio and he sounded nothing like a leader, instead he sounded like a deflated man.       
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 03:48:03 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 03:00:32 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 02:01:39 PM
Just as a matter of interest, where do you stand on the constitutional issue, Nationalist, Unionist, Loyalist or Republican?

Republican.
So how do you propose we achieve a UI other than through the political strategy that's being followed now?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on September 14, 2022, 04:11:37 PM
Quote from: yellowcard on September 14, 2022, 03:46:56 PM
Quote from: skeog on September 14, 2022, 03:18:22 PM
Arlene dont close the boiler scheme now bleating about yesterday.What a pathetic bitter woman.

Most former politicians tend to stray into the shadows and become more mellow after they leave the stage. Arlene has actually got even more bitter and divisive since she resigned from office. It's almost like she is trying to over compensate to prove her ultra Britishness after her catastrophic leadership that promoted and brought about Brexit itself.

At the risk of repeating myself, it absolutely kills these DUP politicians that they are seen to be playing second fiddle to nationalists when they clearly see themselves as the natural rulers of society here. First minister/ joint first minister doesn't really make much difference to the majority of people but it is something that really grates with their political leaders when they have been used to supremacy since the creation of the state. Listening to Jeffrey Donaldson this morning on the radio and he sounded nothing like a leader, instead he sounded like a deflated man.     

It's a career for her now in the media.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Solo_run on September 14, 2022, 04:11:56 PM
Quote from: yellowcard on September 14, 2022, 03:46:56 PM
Quote from: skeog on September 14, 2022, 03:18:22 PM
Arlene dont close the boiler scheme now bleating about yesterday.What a pathetic bitter woman.

Most former politicians tend to stray into the shadows and become more mellow after they leave the stage. Arlene has actually got even more bitter and divisive since she resigned from office. It's almost like she is trying to over compensate to prove her ultra Britishness after her catastrophic leadership that promoted and brought about Brexit itself.

At the risk of repeating myself, it absolutely kills these DUP politicians that they are seen to be playing second fiddle to nationalists when they clearly see themselves as the natural rulers of society here. First minister/ joint first minister doesn't really make much difference to the majority of people but it is something that really grates with their political leaders when they have been used to supremacy since the creation of the state. Listening to Jeffrey Donaldson this morning on the radio and he sounded nothing like a leader, instead he sounded like a deflated man.     

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/arlene-foster-slams-mainstream-media-for-intense-coverage-of-sinn-fein-meeting-king-charles-iii-41989108.html
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Rossfan on September 14, 2022, 04:24:43 PM
Pretend they don't exist and they'll go away...
How absolutely fkn pathetic!
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: yellowcard on September 14, 2022, 04:56:33 PM
The steam coming out of that Arlene Foster article is something to behold. She even manages to get a frontal dig into 'the president of Ireland, as he is styled'.

Now we have Kate Hoey complaining that the Irish government contingent was far too big at the cathedral. And Jim Allister has now made a home video castigating the BBC for apparently making yesterday all about Sinn Fein. Pure Trumpian stuff and its almost like it is a deliberately orchestrated campaign by these three. Its only a matter of time before wee Jamie jumps on board to get a piece of the action too with his phony little culture wars.     
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Franko on September 14, 2022, 05:12:01 PM
The more cerebral 'middle ground' unionist voters that get talked about ad nauseum on this forum MUST be able to see how pathetic this is
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: armaghniac on September 14, 2022, 05:36:11 PM
Quote from: Franko on September 14, 2022, 05:12:01 PM
The more cerebral 'middle ground' unionist voters that get talked about ad nauseum on this forum MUST be able to see how pathetic this is

While Allister or Foster being odious might play well in certain quarters, the "middle ground" will not be impressed. Comments elsewhere suggest that the middle ground recognised SF as having done the responsible thing. Unionism ends up ranting to itself while the bulk of NI society goes on without it.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 06:29:37 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 03:48:03 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 03:00:32 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 02:01:39 PM
Just as a matter of interest, where do you stand on the constitutional issue, Nationalist, Unionist, Loyalist or Republican?

Republican.
So how do you propose we achieve a UI other than through the political strategy that's being followed now?

It's plus 1 isn't it?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: RedHand88 on September 14, 2022, 07:40:06 PM
Quote from: Franko on September 14, 2022, 05:12:01 PM
The more cerebral 'middle ground' unionist voters that get talked about ad nauseum on this forum MUST be able to see how pathetic this is

They do. They either don't vote or vote Alliance.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 14, 2022, 08:00:08 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 03:48:03 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 14, 2022, 03:00:32 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 14, 2022, 02:01:39 PM
Just as a matter of interest, where do you stand on the constitutional issue, Nationalist, Unionist, Loyalist or Republican?

Republican.
So how do you propose we achieve a UI other than through the political strategy that's being followed now?
Economic collapse
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Kidder81 on September 14, 2022, 08:01:26 PM
There will be some craic with all the ones filing past the coffin, there will be "influencers", someone will "protest" etc........
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Armagh18 on September 14, 2022, 09:09:32 PM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 14, 2022, 08:01:26 PM
There will be some craic with all the ones filing past the coffin, there will be "influencers", someone will "protest" etc........
Wonder who'll be first to take a selfie with the coffin? Cops aren't covering themselves in glory arresting anyone protesting against the royals
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: RedHand88 on September 14, 2022, 11:14:37 PM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 14, 2022, 08:01:26 PM
There will be some craic with all the ones filing past the coffin, there will be "influencers", someone will "protest" etc........

Would ye bother queueing for 30 hours for that? Mind you there's balloons probably would. Had a quick nosy at the bbc live feed of ones walking past. 14,000 watching live! Mad country.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 14, 2022, 11:24:09 PM
If Michael Collins was your thing would you wait 30 hours?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 15, 2022, 05:15:44 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/JimAllister/status/1570060371205005314
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Ethan Tremblay on September 15, 2022, 09:37:45 AM
Quote from: seafoid on September 15, 2022, 05:15:44 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/JimAllister/status/1570060371205005314

Living rent free in that dinosaur's head they are.  On a personal note, I absolutely detest his cunty voice, no matter what he is talking about. 
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Armagh18 on September 15, 2022, 10:52:02 AM
I see one of the guards fainted
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: AustinPowers on September 15, 2022, 10:57:51 AM
Quote from: seafoid on September 15, 2022, 05:15:44 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/JimAllister/status/1570060371205005314

They need division  in order to  exist .  Constantly Finding something  to complain about to peddle  their bigoted, divisive narrative and rile up  their  Neanderthal voters  who'll vote them in again, so the cycle   continue s
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: theskull1 on September 15, 2022, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 15, 2022, 10:57:51 AM
They need division  in order to  exist .

Not spoken about enough. They need hatred to survive.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Snapchap on September 15, 2022, 11:14:19 AM
Quote from: theskull1 on September 15, 2022, 11:05:32 AM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 15, 2022, 10:57:51 AM
They need division  in order to  exist .

Not spoken about enough. They need hatred to survive.

I posted yesterday about the positive reaction SF were getting in the last few days from the 'middle of the roaders', but the reaction of political unionism has been so utterly predictable - they have managed to be outraged at SF showing respect to their monarch. Consider their outraged reaction had SF decided not to meet Charles too. Show's what nationalism is up against in the six counties.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on September 15, 2022, 11:14:41 AM
Quote from: seafoid on September 15, 2022, 05:15:44 AM
https://mobile.twitter.com/JimAllister/status/1570060371205005314

Accusing the media of focusing on Sinn Fein during a period of mourning by making a video of his own during a period of mourning focusing on yes you guessed it Sinn Fein.

Do they ever come up for air!!! Judging by the red beak of Jim...not very often. The man is a walking blood pressure explosion.

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 15, 2022, 11:54:57 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on September 15, 2022, 10:52:02 AM
I see one of the guards fainted
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11213613/Drama-guard-FAINTS-podium-holding-vigil-Queens-coffin-Westminster-Hall.html
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on September 15, 2022, 03:18:44 PM
Ben Lowry was on the biggest show in the country earlier on and it was great to hear him squirming when Nolan pushed him on the whole thing. It always amazes me that him and Sam McBride get so much unfettered airtime given the editorial roles they play. They are clearly peddling a particular agenda yet the equivalent 'green' reporters are not interviewed.

Clock is ticking and they all know it. The Queens death ironically may speed it all up....
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: charlieTully on September 15, 2022, 03:26:08 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 15, 2022, 03:18:44 PM
Ben Lowry was on the biggest show in the country earlier on and it was great to hear him squirming when Nolan pushed him on the whole thing. It always amazes me that him and Sam McBride get so much unfettered airtime given the editorial roles they play. They are clearly peddling a particular agenda yet the equivalent 'green' reporters are not interviewed.

Clock is ticking and they all know it. The Queens death ironically may speed it all up....

Have to say I dont find Sam as bad, Ben cannot hide his bitterness, Alison Morris is on quite a bit albeit she with the bel tel now, there is some jouro from the andytown news on a fair bit and chris Donnolly.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: smelmoth on September 15, 2022, 03:30:49 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 15, 2022, 03:18:44 PM
Ben Lowry was on the biggest show in the country earlier on and it was great to hear him squirming when Nolan pushed him on the whole thing. It always amazes me that him and Sam McBride get so much unfettered airtime given the editorial roles they play. They are clearly peddling a particular agenda yet the equivalent 'green' reporters are not interviewed.

Clock is ticking and they all know it. The Queens death ironically may speed it all up....

What agenda is Sam McBride peddling?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: imtommygunn on September 15, 2022, 03:32:09 PM
Mcbride isn't that bad. Lowry is basically a rabid dog. I honestly think he is just playing to the gallows to boost his paper sales. (That is probably worse tbh ).
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: smelmoth on September 15, 2022, 03:34:23 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on September 15, 2022, 03:32:09 PM
Mcbride isn't that bad. Lowry is basically a rabid dog. I honestly think he is just playing to the gallows to boost his paper sales. (That is probably worse tbh ).

I think you have invented a new phrase there but with B. Lowry it might actually be apt.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 15, 2022, 03:35:04 PM
Didn't think Liz would have got to 12 + pages.. Ya wee royalists
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 15, 2022, 03:45:56 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 15, 2022, 03:35:04 PM
Didn't think Liz would have got to 12 + pages.. Ya wee royalists

All reminiscing about the time we all got to gawp at her and how her rays of service, utter brilliance, love etc etc touched upon us like the Holy Spirit did to the 11 apostles (no wimmen allowed) and how we're deeply impacted on the untimely death of a 96 year old...


Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on September 15, 2022, 05:40:57 PM
McBrides reasonable veneer slides by times. Not as bad as Lowry but not an innocent either.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Tony Baloney on September 15, 2022, 06:40:50 PM
Cancelling flights now to keep the noise down during 2 minute silence. Mad oul spot over there.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Eire90 on September 16, 2022, 01:25:15 AM
dup blaming irish on why English dont give two fs about them in their big egos it cant possibly be the English dont care about them ohh  its the irish fault.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 16, 2022, 05:35:01 AM
https://www.google.com/amp/s/scheerpost.com/2022/09/12/chris-hedges-monarchs-belong-in-the-dustbin-of-history/amp/The point of social hierarchy and aristocracy is to sustain a class system that makes the rest of us feel inferior. Those at the top of the social hierarchy hand out tokens for loyal service, including the Order of the British Empire (OBE). The monarchy is the bedrock of hereditary rule and inherited wealth. This caste system filters down from the Nazi-loving House of Windsor to the organs of state security and the military. It regiments society and keeps people, especially the poor and the working class, in their "proper" place.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Walter Cronc on September 16, 2022, 06:42:18 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 15, 2022, 05:40:57 PM
McBrides reasonable veneer slides by times. Not as bad as Lowry but not an innocent either.

Agree. Something sneaky about McBride.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 08:58:03 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\

To us that is mental but to your average English person this is their Queen. It is huge for them and this is one of the most significant historical events in English history.  It would be churlish to underestimate that. The concept of Great Britain is teetering on the edge. She has been a constant for the majority of the population the whole of their lives. This is a huge moment in history and many want to be part of it. At the heel of the hunt though they reckon about half a million will visit her over the period of laying in state. With a population of close to 70m that's only a drop in the ocean.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Franko on September 16, 2022, 09:08:05 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 08:58:03 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\

To us that is mental but to your average English person this is their Queen. It is huge for them and this is one of the most significant historical events in English history.  It would be churlish to underestimate that. The concept of Great Britain is teetering on the edge. She has been a constant for the majority of the population the whole of their lives. This is a huge moment in history and many want to be part of it. At the heel of the hunt though they reckon about half a million will visit her over the period of laying in state. With a population of close to 70m that's only a drop in the ocean.

It is clearly nuts, but I do remember as a child, queueing in a very long line to file past the coffin of Cardinal O'Fiaich many years ago in the Cathedral in Armagh

Us Irish are not averse to getting caught up in a bit of hysteria either
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: snoopdog on September 16, 2022, 09:13:43 AM
The coffin isn't even open so all they see is the royal coat of arms draped over the coffin .
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 16, 2022, 09:19:29 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\
It's hard for Irish or French people to understand the English fascination with royalty.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 09:27:22 AM
Quote from: Franko on September 16, 2022, 09:08:05 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 08:58:03 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\

To us that is mental but to your average English person this is their Queen. It is huge for them and this is one of the most significant historical events in English history.  It would be churlish to underestimate that. The concept of Great Britain is teetering on the edge. She has been a constant for the majority of the population the whole of their lives. This is a huge moment in history and many want to be part of it. At the heel of the hunt though they reckon about half a million will visit her over the period of laying in state. With a population of close to 70m that's only a drop in the ocean.

It is clearly nuts, but I do remember as a child, queueing in a very long line to file past the coffin of Cardinal O'Fiaich many years ago in the Cathedral in Armagh

Us Irish are not averse to getting caught up in a bit of hysteria either

A very good comparison. The Cardinal was as close as we got to 'royalty' in terms of position and respect.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Aristo 60 on September 16, 2022, 09:29:37 AM
Quote from: Franko on September 16, 2022, 09:08:05 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 08:58:03 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\

To us that is mental but to your average English person this is their Queen. It is huge for them and this is one of the most significant historical events in English history.  It would be churlish to underestimate that. The concept of Great Britain is teetering on the edge. She has been a constant for the majority of the population the whole of their lives. This is a huge moment in history and many want to be part of it. At the heel of the hunt though they reckon about half a million will visit her over the period of laying in state. With a population of close to 70m that's only a drop in the ocean.

It is clearly nuts, but I do remember as a child, queueing in a very long line to file past the coffin of Cardinal O'Fiaich many years ago in the Cathedral in Armagh

Us Irish are not averse to getting caught up in a bit of hysteria either

The wife couldn't understand the walking past the coffin but I remembered doing the same for the Cardinal. 1990 I see it was. I'm sure it was 30 minutes though and not 12 hours. If John Hume had lived to see the 32 counties as one and maybe became its first president, we'd all have gladly walked past that coffin too.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: gallsman on September 16, 2022, 09:46:05 AM
Only 500k? Is that correct? They've been queueing for miles and miles for days. If it was only 500k I'd be very surprised.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 16, 2022, 11:13:32 AM
Quote from: Franko on September 16, 2022, 09:08:05 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 08:58:03 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\

To us that is mental but to your average English person this is their Queen. It is huge for them and this is one of the most significant historical events in English history.  It would be churlish to underestimate that. The concept of Great Britain is teetering on the edge. She has been a constant for the majority of the population the whole of their lives. This is a huge moment in history and many want to be part of it. At the heel of the hunt though they reckon about half a million will visit her over the period of laying in state. With a population of close to 70m that's only a drop in the ocean.

It is clearly nuts, but I do remember as a child, queueing in a very long line to file past the coffin of Cardinal O'Fiaich many years ago in the Cathedral in Armagh

Us Irish are not averse to getting caught up in a bit of hysteria either

Queued 70 odd minutes in Disney to get on a Spiderman 3D ride which lasted 2 minutes max, but I suppose the wee ones loved it, but swore never to do anything like that again and I'll stand by that no matter who's in the pine box with whatever bunting draped over it...

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: armaghniac on September 16, 2022, 12:10:27 PM
Quote from: Franko on September 16, 2022, 09:08:05 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 08:58:03 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\

To us that is mental but to your average English person this is their Queen. It is huge for them and this is one of the most significant historical events in English history.  It would be churlish to underestimate that. The concept of Great Britain is teetering on the edge. She has been a constant for the majority of the population the whole of their lives. This is a huge moment in history and many want to be part of it. At the heel of the hunt though they reckon about half a million will visit her over the period of laying in state. With a population of close to 70m that's only a drop in the ocean.

It is clearly nuts, but I do remember as a child, queueing in a very long line to file past the coffin of Cardinal O'Fiaich many years ago in the Cathedral in Armagh

Us Irish are not averse to getting caught up in a bit of hysteria either

Sure look at the crowds at the George Best funeral, an alcoholic footballer.

It is a moment in history. I think though they should probably have travelled overland from Scotland and given people a chance to stand in their own town.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: paddyjohn on September 16, 2022, 12:16:12 PM
Whole thing is wrong.

Royals are absolute scumbags.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on September 16, 2022, 12:29:09 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 16, 2022, 12:10:27 PM
Quote from: Franko on September 16, 2022, 09:08:05 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 08:58:03 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\

To us that is mental but to your average English person this is their Queen. It is huge for them and this is one of the most significant historical events in English history.  It would be churlish to underestimate that. The concept of Great Britain is teetering on the edge. She has been a constant for the majority of the population the whole of their lives. This is a huge moment in history and many want to be part of it. At the heel of the hunt though they reckon about half a million will visit her over the period of laying in state. With a population of close to 70m that's only a drop in the ocean.

It is clearly nuts, but I do remember as a child, queueing in a very long line to file past the coffin of Cardinal O'Fiaich many years ago in the Cathedral in Armagh

Us Irish are not averse to getting caught up in a bit of hysteria either

Sure look at the crowds at the George Best funeral, an alcoholic footballer.

It is a moment in history. I think though they should probably have travelled overland from Scotland and given people a chance to stand in their own town.

If this had happened 20/30 years ago when she wasn't an old woman I don't think there would have been the same mass hysteria that there is now. I'd put much of this down to her simply being just an old woman now and everyone relates to that with their granny.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 16, 2022, 01:08:41 PM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on September 16, 2022, 12:29:09 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 16, 2022, 12:10:27 PM
Quote from: Franko on September 16, 2022, 09:08:05 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 08:58:03 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\

To us that is mental but to your average English person this is their Queen. It is huge for them and this is one of the most significant historical events in English history.  It would be churlish to underestimate that. The concept of Great Britain is teetering on the edge. She has been a constant for the majority of the population the whole of their lives. This is a huge moment in history and many want to be part of it. At the heel of the hunt though they reckon about half a million will visit her over the period of laying in state. With a population of close to 70m that's only a drop in the ocean.

It is clearly nuts, but I do remember as a child, queueing in a very long line to file past the coffin of Cardinal O'Fiaich many years ago in the Cathedral in Armagh

Us Irish are not averse to getting caught up in a bit of hysteria either

Sure look at the crowds at the George Best funeral, an alcoholic footballer.

It is a moment in history. I think though they should probably have travelled overland from Scotland and given people a chance to stand in their own town.

If this had happened 20/30 years ago when she wasn't an old woman I don't think there would have been the same mass hysteria that there is now. I'd put much of this down to her simply being just an old woman now and everyone relates to that with their granny.
I was in London when Diana died and it was the same social contagion. The Royals are the ultimate soap opera and class system pinnacle combo.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 16, 2022, 01:12:48 PM
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11218809/Queens-eight-grandchildren-hold-special-vigil-coffin-Saturday-night.html
Prince Andrew, who also stepped back frontline royal duties in the wake of the Jeffrey Epstein sex scandal, is set to be given special dispensation to wear his colours on Friday night, when the Queen's four children will hold another vigil.

He will join King Charles, Princess Anne and Prince Edward in standing guard, having also done so at St Giles' Cathedral in Edinburgh earlier this week.

The exception was made for the Duke of York to wear uniform for the vigil at Westminster Hall as a 'final mark of respect' for his mother.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Orior on September 16, 2022, 01:56:44 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 15, 2022, 03:35:04 PM
Didn't think Liz would have got to 12 + pages.. Ya wee royalists

As someone else said, we'll keep it going until the Month's Mind.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: quit yo jibbajabba on September 16, 2022, 02:34:07 PM
Quote from: Orior on September 16, 2022, 01:56:44 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 15, 2022, 03:35:04 PM
Didn't think Liz would have got to 12 + pages.. Ya wee royalists

As someone else said, we'll keep it going until the Month's Mind.

Jaysus if everyone had made a locka sambos that wouldve been a sight to behold
The big box and a big mountain o sambos beside it. Take one as you leave. Youve been queuing for 14hrs after all
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Capt Pat on September 16, 2022, 02:40:33 PM
David Beckham is lining up with the commoners.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 02:44:49 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on September 16, 2022, 02:40:33 PM
David Beckham is lining up with the commoners.

Another push for the knighthood
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 02:58:34 PM
I see the Census results have been pushed out a few days from the 20th. Must be terrified what a crowd of hungover loyalists will get up to when they find out they're no longer the majority!

Ironically it's been pushed out to another date which is significant in Orange history....22nd September....something else happened on that date some years back that Orange men celebrated....here's Tony when ye need him?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: quit yo jibbajabba on September 16, 2022, 03:30:27 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on September 16, 2022, 02:40:33 PM
David Beckham is lining up with the commoners.

See MPs didnt have to queue and could bring 4 others with them. Few other groups were exempt also. All a bit Animal Farmish....not that one the other one
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 16, 2022, 04:41:29 PM
Ar fheabhas

https://mobile.twitter.com/Lee_T/status/1570691014964445186
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 07:02:26 PM
Man charged with lying-in-state queue sex assaults

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-62932781

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Main Street on September 17, 2022, 02:17:53 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 07:02:26 PM
Man charged with lying-in-state queue sex assaults

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-62932781
Innocent until proven guilty, even if he has a dodgy foreign sounding name.


Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: smelmoth on September 17, 2022, 06:57:31 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 15, 2022, 05:40:57 PM
McBrides reasonable veneer slides by times.
When was this then?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Armagh18 on September 17, 2022, 08:49:48 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 07:02:26 PM
Man charged with lying-in-state queue sex assaults

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-62932781
you'd think they'd keep a closer eye on Andrew ffs
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: LC on September 17, 2022, 08:56:34 AM
https://inews.co.uk/opinion/unionists-are-embarrassing-themselves-by-overreacting-to-king-charless-meeting-with-sinn-fein-1858453
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: armaghniac on September 17, 2022, 01:07:48 PM
Quote from: LC on September 17, 2022, 08:56:34 AM
https://inews.co.uk/opinion/unionists-are-embarrassing-themselves-by-overreacting-to-king-charless-meeting-with-sinn-fein-1858453

Unionists embarrassing themselves? Whatever next?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: imtommygunn on September 17, 2022, 03:21:34 PM
When was the last constructive thing a unionist politician did? ( Well specifically dup or TUV as I fail to see what they add to society)
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Eamonnca1 on September 17, 2022, 06:27:17 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on September 17, 2022, 03:21:34 PM
When was the last constructive thing a unionist politician did? ( Well specifically dup or TUV as I fail to see what they add to society)

Doug Beattie and the UUP refusing to join the DUP's petition of concern for the Alliance's integrated education bill. It subsequently passed in the Assembly. DUP and TUV? Hard to say what they've done that's constructive.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Eamonnca1 on September 17, 2022, 06:29:54 PM
Quote from: seafoid on September 16, 2022, 01:08:41 PM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on September 16, 2022, 12:29:09 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 16, 2022, 12:10:27 PM
Quote from: Franko on September 16, 2022, 09:08:05 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 16, 2022, 08:58:03 AM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 16, 2022, 08:09:09 AM
I can't get my head round these eejits queuing, currently a 12 hour wait  :-\

To us that is mental but to your average English person this is their Queen. It is huge for them and this is one of the most significant historical events in English history.  It would be churlish to underestimate that. The concept of Great Britain is teetering on the edge. She has been a constant for the majority of the population the whole of their lives. This is a huge moment in history and many want to be part of it. At the heel of the hunt though they reckon about half a million will visit her over the period of laying in state. With a population of close to 70m that's only a drop in the ocean.

It is clearly nuts, but I do remember as a child, queueing in a very long line to file past the coffin of Cardinal O'Fiaich many years ago in the Cathedral in Armagh

Us Irish are not averse to getting caught up in a bit of hysteria either

Sure look at the crowds at the George Best funeral, an alcoholic footballer.

It is a moment in history. I think though they should probably have travelled overland from Scotland and given people a chance to stand in their own town.

If this had happened 20/30 years ago when she wasn't an old woman I don't think there would have been the same mass hysteria that there is now. I'd put much of this down to her simply being just an old woman now and everyone relates to that with their granny.
I was in London when Diana died and it was the same social contagion. The Royals are the ultimate soap opera and class system pinnacle combo.

Ever see Christopher Hitchens's documentary about the Diana hysteria?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: BrotherMore6592 on September 18, 2022, 12:12:35 AM
"Lizzies in a box "

Hearts fans sure got the blood boiling at rangers today
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: gallsman on September 18, 2022, 06:42:21 AM
Quote from: BrotherMore6592 on September 18, 2022, 12:12:35 AM
"Lizzies in a box "

Hearts fans sure got the blood boiling at rangers today

Dundee United. Hearts fans would tend be of a similar persuasion to the Gers.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Eire90 on September 18, 2022, 08:07:48 AM
ireland is basically a ff/fg monarchy
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 18, 2022, 08:18:50 AM
Quote from: Eire90 on September 18, 2022, 08:07:48 AM
ireland is basically a ff/fg monarchy
Nothing changes in a monarchy. The Shinners could be in charge shortly.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: ned on September 18, 2022, 09:10:58 AM
Quote from: gallsman on September 18, 2022, 06:42:21 AM
Quote from: BrotherMore6592 on September 18, 2022, 12:12:35 AM
"Lizzies in a box "

Hearts fans sure got the blood boiling at rangers today

Dundee United. Hearts fans would tend be of a similar persuasion to the Gers.

Except there was plenty of FTQs and booing at their match on Thursday.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 18, 2022, 09:42:50 AM
Is Eben Etzebeth related to the Royal Family ?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 11:16:55 AM
Quote from: Eire90 on September 18, 2022, 08:07:48 AM
ireland is basically a ff/fg monarchy

Eh?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: grounded on September 18, 2022, 04:17:58 PM
https://www.newsletter.co.uk/business/queens-funeral-supervalu-says-policy-is-the-same-in-republican-dungiven-as-it-is-anywhere-else-staff-that-want-to-work-can-3846592

The cheek of them opening tomorrow. Those dam Republicans wanting to work.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Jim Bob on September 18, 2022, 04:22:01 PM
Are all who are getting a day off tomorrow getting an extra days paid holiday or are some firms taking the day out of the employees holiday allowance ?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 04:28:22 PM
Quote from: Jim Bob on September 18, 2022, 04:22:01 PM
Are all who are getting a day off tomorrow getting an extra days paid holiday or are some firms taking the day out of the employees holiday allowance ?

I'd imagine if it's a public holiday and you work in the public sector you'll be getting paid, if you're employed private sector ya won't
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Tony Baloney on September 18, 2022, 05:26:05 PM
Quote from: Jim Bob on September 18, 2022, 04:22:01 PM
Are all who are getting a day off tomorrow getting an extra days paid holiday or are some firms taking the day out of the employees holiday allowance ?
Extra day paid holiday.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: grounded on September 18, 2022, 06:11:38 PM
Quote from: Jim Bob on September 18, 2022, 04:22:01 PM
Are all who are getting a day off tomorrow getting an extra days paid holiday or are some firms taking the day out of the employees holiday allowance ?

This bank holiday will operate in the same way as other bank holidays, and there is no statutory entitlement to time off. Employers may include bank holidays as part of a worker's leave entitlement.

I assume iif its a paid holiday then it comes out of the holiday leave entitlement as agreed in workers contracts e.g. if entitled to 28 days paid holiday then will be taken out of that, unless the employer can afford to pay the holiday as an extra day over and above that agreed.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:48:54 PM
Glad to see most nurses when asked said they would report for work.

Gps- shut
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:51:14 PM
RTÉ showing funeral? Shocking if they are
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: RedHand88 on September 18, 2022, 10:23:24 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:48:54 PM
Glad to see most nurses when asked said they would report for work.

Gps- shut

GPs unfortunately have no say, board tell them what to do.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:26:43 PM
Quote from: RedHand88 on September 18, 2022, 10:23:24 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:48:54 PM
Glad to see most nurses when asked said they would report for work.

Gps- shut

GPs unfortunately have no say, board tell them what to do.

Wasn't sure who makes decisions, very poor and I'll thought out
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:27:23 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:51:14 PM
RTÉ showing funeral? Shocking if they are

RTÉ One, 10.30am - 12.30pm tomorrow.

"Ray Kennedy presents a special programme featuring coverage of the state funeral from Westminster Abbey, London, with Kate Egan providing commentary on the ceremony"

https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/listings/television/#!/rte1/2022-09-19

In fairness, it's gonna be a cheapish two hour filler on a weekday morning of a major international event that's not going to displace anything significant in the schedule, in between The Ellen DeGeneres Show & another 'murican show The Doctors.

Shouldn't be on. Full stop
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:29:24 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:27:23 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:51:14 PM
RTÉ showing funeral? Shocking if they are

RTÉ One, 10.30am - 12.30pm tomorrow.

"Ray Kennedy presents a special programme featuring coverage of the state funeral from Westminster Abbey, London, with Kate Egan providing commentary on the ceremony"

https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/listings/television/#!/rte1/2022-09-19

In fairness, it's gonna be a cheapish two hour filler on a weekday morning of a major international event that's not going to displace anything significant in the schedule, in between The Ellen DeGeneres Show & another 'murican show The Doctors.

Shouldn't be on. Full stop

You'll be at work and will miss it
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: From the Bunker on September 18, 2022, 10:30:02 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:51:14 PM
RTÉ showing funeral? Shocking if they are

RTÉ One, 10.30am - 12.30pm tomorrow.

"Ray Kennedy presents a special programme featuring coverage of the state funeral from Westminster Abbey, London, with Kate Egan providing commentary on the ceremony"

https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/listings/television/#!/rte1/2022-09-19

In fairness, it's gonna be a cheapish two hour filler on a weekday morning of a major international event that's not going to displace anything significant in the schedule, in between The Ellen DeGeneres Show & another 'murican show The Doctors.

This is a bit like RTE paying to show ''Eastenders'' weekdays and it's on the BBC at the same time.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: RedHand88 on September 18, 2022, 10:30:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:26:43 PM
Quote from: RedHand88 on September 18, 2022, 10:23:24 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:48:54 PM
Glad to see most nurses when asked said they would report for work.

Gps- shut

GPs unfortunately have no say, board tell them what to do.

Wasn't sure who makes decisions, very poor and I'll thought out

If a shop in Dungiven can't stay open without the Nolan media circus up their hole there's no way they'd let GPs open!
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: RedHand88 on September 18, 2022, 10:32:18 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:48:54 PM
Glad to see most nurses when asked said they would report for work.

Gps- shut

Also I think nurses are getting double time tomorrow. You'd work it yourself!  ::)
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:36:06 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:31:43 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:27:23 PMShouldn't be on. Full stop

Then send an email to complaints@rte.ie

https://about.rte.ie/contact/complaints/ (https://about.rte.ie/contact/complaints/)

Do you reckon they will change it for me lol?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:36:37 PM
Quote from: RedHand88 on September 18, 2022, 10:30:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:26:43 PM
Quote from: RedHand88 on September 18, 2022, 10:23:24 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:48:54 PM
Glad to see most nurses when asked said they would report for work.

Gps- shut

GPs unfortunately have no say, board tell them what to do.

Wasn't sure who makes decisions, very poor and I'll thought out

If a shop in Dungiven can't stay open without the Nolan media circus up their hole there's no way they'd let GPs open!

Apples and pears
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:38:26 PM
Quote from: RedHand88 on September 18, 2022, 10:32:18 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:48:54 PM
Glad to see most nurses when asked said they would report for work.

Gps- shut

Also I think nurses are getting double time tomorrow. You'd work it yourself!  ::)

If you were a red flag from docs waiting to be seen , youd be really pissed off they decided to close, that's the driver
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:39:32 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:29:24 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:27:23 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:51:14 PM
RTÉ showing funeral? Shocking if they are

RTÉ One, 10.30am - 12.30pm tomorrow.

"Ray Kennedy presents a special programme featuring coverage of the state funeral from Westminster Abbey, London, with Kate Egan providing commentary on the ceremony"

https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/listings/television/#!/rte1/2022-09-19

In fairness, it's gonna be a cheapish two hour filler on a weekday morning of a major international event that's not going to displace anything significant in the schedule, in between The Ellen DeGeneres Show & another 'murican show The Doctors.

Shouldn't be on. Full stop

You'll be at work and will miss it

I'm thinking on the children - pollution man
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:42:36 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:39:32 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:29:24 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:27:23 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:51:14 PM
RTÉ showing funeral? Shocking if they are

RTÉ One, 10.30am - 12.30pm tomorrow.

"Ray Kennedy presents a special programme featuring coverage of the state funeral from Westminster Abbey, London, with Kate Egan providing commentary on the ceremony"

https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/listings/television/#!/rte1/2022-09-19

In fairness, it's gonna be a cheapish two hour filler on a weekday morning of a major international event that's not going to displace anything significant in the schedule, in between The Ellen DeGeneres Show & another 'murican show The Doctors.

Shouldn't be on. Full stop

You'll be at work and will miss it

I'm thinking on the children - pollution man

On the children or of them? Your obsession with the queen is a bit unsettling
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:49:19 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:42:36 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:39:32 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:29:24 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:27:23 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:51:14 PM
RTÉ showing funeral? Shocking if they are

RTÉ One, 10.30am - 12.30pm tomorrow.

"Ray Kennedy presents a special programme featuring coverage of the state funeral from Westminster Abbey, London, with Kate Egan providing commentary on the ceremony"

https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/listings/television/#!/rte1/2022-09-19

In fairness, it's gonna be a cheapish two hour filler on a weekday morning of a major international event that's not going to displace anything significant in the schedule, in between The Ellen DeGeneres Show & another 'murican show The Doctors.

Shouldn't be on. Full stop

You'll be at work and will miss it

I'm thinking on the children - pollution man

On the children or of them? Your obsession with the queen is a bit unsettling

I'm not sure I follow. You having a wee Sunday dram. Off tomorrow?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:53:53 PM
I wish, on a boat at the minute, but you've had some posts on here about the queen, which would suggest you're obsessed.

Your failed attempts to wind up those shinners is pretty poor though

I work in a doctors surgery so I'm off by default  ;D
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:54:21 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:52:34 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:36:06 PM
Do you reckon they will change it for me lol?

Won't do any worse than complaining about it here anyway.

Sorry I forgot it was a discussion forum there for a wee minute
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:57:08 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:53:53 PM
I wish, on a boat at the minute, but you've had some posts on here about the queen, which would suggest you're obsessed.

Your failed attempts to wind up those shinners is pretty poor though

I work in a doctors surgery so I'm off by default  ;D

You've made about 15 posts there yourself lol.

Now don't be getting "unsettled" and you away from home for god's sake.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 11:00:57 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:57:31 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:54:21 PM
Sorry I forgot it was a discussion forum there for a wee minute

Whinge away here all you want. I doubt anyone in charge of scheduling at RTÉ will see it though.

Bit like all the whinging for years on here about FF/fg west Brit RTÉ partitionist blah blah blah.

Some change now
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 11:05:47 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:57:08 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:53:53 PM
I wish, on a boat at the minute, but you've had some posts on here about the queen, which would suggest you're obsessed.

Your failed attempts to wind up those shinners is pretty poor though

I work in a doctors surgery so I'm off by default  ;D

You've made about 15 posts there yourself lol.

Now don't be getting "unsettled" and you away from home for god's sake.

Like I said you'll be at work, you'll not see anything so you'll be grand
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 11:21:10 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 11:19:25 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 11:00:57 PMBit like all the whinging for years on here about FF/fg west Brit RTÉ partitionist blah blah blah.

Some change now

So you're not going to complain about it to RTÉ then?

RTÉ a chara
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 11:21:37 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 11:05:47 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:57:08 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on September 18, 2022, 10:53:53 PM
I wish, on a boat at the minute, but you've had some posts on here about the queen, which would suggest you're obsessed.

Your failed attempts to wind up those shinners is pretty poor though

I work in a doctors surgery so I'm off by default  ;D

You've made about 15 posts there yourself lol.

Now don't be getting "unsettled" and you away from home for god's sake.

Like I said you'll be at work, you'll not see anything so you'll be grand

Donegal pride of all!
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 18, 2022, 11:41:18 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:27:23 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:51:14 PM
RTÉ showing funeral? Shocking if they are

RTÉ One, 10.30am - 12.30pm tomorrow.

"Ray Kennedy presents a special programme featuring coverage of the state funeral from Westminster Abbey, London, with Kate Egan providing commentary on the ceremony"

https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/listings/television/#!/rte1/2022-09-19

In fairness, it's gonna be a cheapish two hour filler on a weekday morning of a major international event that's not going to displace anything significant in the schedule, in between The Ellen DeGeneres Show & another 'murican show The Doctors.

Shouldn't be on. Full stop
Methinks thou doth protest too much
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 19, 2022, 12:12:50 AM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 18, 2022, 11:41:18 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 10:27:23 PM
Quote from: Fionntamhnach on September 18, 2022, 10:20:10 PM
Quote from: Fear Bun Na Sceilpe on September 18, 2022, 09:51:14 PM
RTÉ showing funeral? Shocking if they are

RTÉ One, 10.30am - 12.30pm tomorrow.

"Ray Kennedy presents a special programme featuring coverage of the state funeral from Westminster Abbey, London, with Kate Egan providing commentary on the ceremony"

https://www.rte.ie/entertainment/listings/television/#!/rte1/2022-09-19

In fairness, it's gonna be a cheapish two hour filler on a weekday morning of a major international event that's not going to displace anything significant in the schedule, in between The Ellen DeGeneres Show & another 'murican show The Doctors.

Shouldn't be on. Full stop
Methinks thou doth protest too much
https://twitter.com/Toibin1/status/1571561726981570561?t=Cp9h5-VX9VPNgiFvCgF2pw&s=19
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 19, 2022, 07:53:09 AM
Would it make it OK if the funeral was on TG4?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: quit yo jibbajabba on September 19, 2022, 09:10:44 AM
stay strong guys. One more day of the circus to go. Tho this is gonna be a long one (and i read ten days of mourning afterwards so fcuk knows what that entails)
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on September 19, 2022, 09:12:38 AM
I genuinely think people need to have some perspective, on all sides, in this issue. Whether we like it or not we are inextricably linked to Britain and whether we like it or not the death of the longest reigning monarch in the history is a seismic event. The political and social ramifications of it will be felt across the globe. England and by extension Britain is one of the worlds most influential countries. That influence is waining at the minute but London is still one of the worlds most powerful cities. This is a historic event and we need to recognise that.

RTÉ are entitled to show it, and in fact it is sensible to do so. I don't agree with essential services being closed but there's no issue with other businesses closing down. On the flip side I don't like the nazi-like approach of forcing or threatening businesses that don't close down.

This is a real time of historic change world wide and this is part of it. I will sit at home today, maybe watch it, maybe not, but I'm not going to get too wrapped up in the whys and what fors either as come tomorrow it will be over and the world will keep turning.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: seafoid on September 19, 2022, 09:17:44 AM
It's different when it's not part of your identity. A lot of RTE viewers will be watching  for the celebrity angles.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: highorlow on September 19, 2022, 12:43:28 PM
QuoteThe political and social ramifications of it will be felt across the globe

What's this gibberish?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Wildweasel74 on September 19, 2022, 12:58:51 PM
There's a lad in front of the navy (carrying the coffin,) must be over 7ft
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: armaghniac on September 19, 2022, 01:51:11 PM
Mighty weather for the show.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: ONeill on September 19, 2022, 03:37:43 PM
Quote from: quit yo jibbajabba on September 19, 2022, 09:10:44 AM
stay strong guys. One more day of the circus to go. Tho this is gonna be a long one (and i read ten days of mourning afterwards so fcuk knows what that entails)

If you crack a joke in public before 29th September you're beheaded.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: ONeill on September 19, 2022, 09:49:22 PM
Didn't see many under 30s there today. Reminded me of the Catholic Church.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Tony Baloney on September 19, 2022, 10:59:43 PM
Quote from: Wildweasel74 on September 19, 2022, 12:58:51 PM
There's a lad in front of the navy (carrying the coffin,) must be over 7ft
7'2" and from this parish. Matthew Magee ex. of Sullivan Upper School.
Title: Re: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Rossfan on September 20, 2022, 03:07:44 PM
As poor oul Mrs Windsor is now buried maybe time to close the thread.
There's already a United Ireland thread.
One parting comnent... did RTÉ have to have 2 news people doing the 6.02 pm News from London.
I couldn't take any more when David McCullough asked some "expert" what would be the significance of this funeral....
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: GAABoardMod5 on September 20, 2022, 11:33:56 PM
Moved a few pages of discussion to the "A United Ireland. Opening up the discussion." thread.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: never kickt a ball on September 20, 2022, 11:53:31 PM
Quote from: Wildweasel74 on September 19, 2022, 12:58:51 PM
There's a lad in front of the navy (carrying the coffin,) must be over 7ft

Past pupil of Sullivan Upper apparently

"Much ado on Twitter about the very tall gentleman that was part of Queen Elizabeth's funeral procession today. That is Matthew Magee, former Sullivan pupil (Class of 2003) and Private Secretary to Her Majesty."
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 21, 2022, 08:05:28 AM
Quote from: never kickt a ball on September 20, 2022, 11:53:31 PM
Quote from: Wildweasel74 on September 19, 2022, 12:58:51 PM
There's a lad in front of the navy (carrying the coffin,) must be over 7ft

Past pupil of Sullivan Upper apparently

"Much ado on Twitter about the very tall gentleman that was part of Queen Elizabeth's funeral procession today. That is Matthew Magee, former Sullivan pupil (Class of 2003) and Private Secretary to Her Majesty."

now that he's a bit of spare time on his hands, would he mind lining out at full forward for St Pauls of Holywood?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on September 21, 2022, 08:13:38 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on September 21, 2022, 08:05:28 AM
Quote from: never kickt a ball on September 20, 2022, 11:53:31 PM
Quote from: Wildweasel74 on September 19, 2022, 12:58:51 PM
There's a lad in front of the navy (carrying the coffin,) must be over 7ft

Past pupil of Sullivan Upper apparently

"Much ado on Twitter about the very tall gentleman that was part of Queen Elizabeth's funeral procession today. That is Matthew Magee, former Sullivan pupil (Class of 2003) and Private Secretary to Her Majesty."

now that he's a bit of spare time on his hands, would he mind lining out at full forward for St Pauls of Holywood?

Surely East Belfast would scoop him up....
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 21, 2022, 08:17:30 AM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on September 21, 2022, 08:13:38 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on September 21, 2022, 08:05:28 AM
Quote from: never kickt a ball on September 20, 2022, 11:53:31 PM
Quote from: Wildweasel74 on September 19, 2022, 12:58:51 PM
There's a lad in front of the navy (carrying the coffin,) must be over 7ft

Past pupil of Sullivan Upper apparently

"Much ado on Twitter about the very tall gentleman that was part of Queen Elizabeth's funeral procession today. That is Matthew Magee, former Sullivan pupil (Class of 2003) and Private Secretary to Her Majesty."

now that he's a bit of spare time on his hands, would he mind lining out at full forward for St Pauls of Holywood?

Surely East Belfast would scoop him up....

Sullivan is just across the road from St Pauls, but yes he could be within the parish boundaries of East Belfast and he might get a go at the auld hurling as well when he's there.  ;D
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: imtommygunn on September 21, 2022, 08:26:33 AM
Him and Magic two man full forward line causing havoc ;D
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Dougal Maguire on September 21, 2022, 08:32:59 AM
A lot of stuff on the media about celebrities queuing or taking the short cut to get to the coffin. Apart from Suzanna Reid and David Beckham does anyone know of any other celebrities who actually queued with the public?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 21, 2022, 10:16:27 AM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 21, 2022, 08:32:59 AM
A lot of stuff on the media about celebrities queuing or taking the short cut to get to the coffin. Apart from Suzanna Reid and David Beckham does anyone know of any other celebrities who actually queued with the public?

2022 and the Brits haven't heard of Queue management. Such a load of made up shite. And public lapped it up.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: imtommygunn on September 21, 2022, 12:25:56 PM
Exactly. Absolute nonsense.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 01:18:43 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 21, 2022, 08:32:59 AM
A lot of stuff on the media about celebrities queuing or taking the short cut to get to the coffin. Apart from Suzanna Reid and David Beckham does anyone know of any other celebrities who actually queued with the public?

I see  there's a petition to get Schofield and  yer woman removed from that morning show for skipping the queue .  Jaysus the Brits are weird
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Kidder81 on September 21, 2022, 01:21:15 PM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 01:18:43 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 21, 2022, 08:32:59 AM
A lot of stuff on the media about celebrities queuing or taking the short cut to get to the coffin. Apart from Suzanna Reid and David Beckham does anyone know of any other celebrities who actually queued with the public?

I see  there's a petition to get Schofield and  yer woman removed from that morning show for skipping the queue .Jaysus the Brits are weird

Even though they didn't jump the queue  ???
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Franko on September 21, 2022, 01:24:06 PM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 01:18:43 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 21, 2022, 08:32:59 AM
A lot of stuff on the media about celebrities queuing or taking the short cut to get to the coffin. Apart from Suzanna Reid and David Beckham does anyone know of any other celebrities who actually queued with the public?

I see  there's a petition to get Schofield and  yer woman removed from that morning show for skipping the queue .  Jaysus the Brits are weird

Lol

Cancel culture is thriving among British royalists
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: trailer on September 21, 2022, 01:54:08 PM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 01:18:43 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 21, 2022, 08:32:59 AM
A lot of stuff on the media about celebrities queuing or taking the short cut to get to the coffin. Apart from Suzanna Reid and David Beckham does anyone know of any other celebrities who actually queued with the public?

I see  there's a petition to get Schofield and  yer woman removed from that morning show for skipping the queue .  Jaysus the Brits are weird

Schofield is a w**ker though. Drop the link so I can sign it.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 21, 2022, 01:56:42 PM
Quote from: Kidder81 on September 21, 2022, 01:21:15 PM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 01:18:43 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 21, 2022, 08:32:59 AM
A lot of stuff on the media about celebrities queuing or taking the short cut to get to the coffin. Apart from Suzanna Reid and David Beckham does anyone know of any other celebrities who actually queued with the public?

I see  there's a petition to get Schofield and  yer woman removed from that morning show for skipping the queue .Jaysus the Brits are weird

Even though they didn't jump the queue  ???

What did they do if they didn't jump the queue?

Surprised they're being singled out as I'm sure there were loads of "celebs" who jumped the queue.

not a dicky bird about the current chancellor of the exchequer laughing and talking away to himself during the funeral service..

Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Tony Baloney on September 21, 2022, 06:58:26 PM
Quote from: trailer on September 21, 2022, 01:54:08 PM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 01:18:43 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 21, 2022, 08:32:59 AM
A lot of stuff on the media about celebrities queuing or taking the short cut to get to the coffin. Apart from Suzanna Reid and David Beckham does anyone know of any other celebrities who actually queued with the public?

I see  there's a petition to get Schofield and  yer woman removed from that morning show for skipping the queue .  Jaysus the Brits are weird

Schofield is a w**ker though. Drop the link so I can sign it.
I'll sign it too.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: WT4E on September 21, 2022, 07:33:26 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on September 21, 2022, 06:58:26 PM
Quote from: trailer on September 21, 2022, 01:54:08 PM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 01:18:43 PM
Quote from: Dougal Maguire on September 21, 2022, 08:32:59 AM
A lot of stuff on the media about celebrities queuing or taking the short cut to get to the coffin. Apart from Suzanna Reid and David Beckham does anyone know of any other celebrities who actually queued with the public?

I see  there's a petition to get Schofield and  yer woman removed from that morning show for skipping the queue .  Jaysus the Brits are weird

Schofield is a w**ker though. Drop the link so I can sign it.
I'll sign it too.

I'll sign it too. An absolute ballbag
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Aristo 60 on September 21, 2022, 07:36:25 PM
It didn't seem to take a fizz out of the british public that he conned his wife for 30 odd years but he skips one measly queue...........
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Milltown Row2 on September 21, 2022, 08:02:08 PM
Crocodile tears from both, if they jumped the line and lose their jobs because of cancel culture then it's on them.. poor judgment and bad call from the producers from not being able to read the room!
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: JoG2 on September 21, 2022, 08:22:57 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 21, 2022, 08:00:40 PM
Quote from: Aristo 60 on September 21, 2022, 07:36:25 PM
It didn't seem to take a fizz out of the british public that he conned his wife for 30 odd years but he skips one measly queue...........

It is OK to con your wife if you turn to perversion, if he had left her for a younger woman then you would never have heard the end of it.

What perversion did he turn to?
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 08:23:16 PM
Quote from: Aristo 60 on September 21, 2022, 07:36:25 PM
It didn't seem to take a fizz out of the british public that he conned his wife for 30 odd years but he skips one measly queue...........

Ah but he was so brave that he could   be true to himself. And live on tv too.   When in reality he  was about to be outed , so got his  poor sob story in first .

Not one word about the wife or kids and  the turmoil they were  in
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: ONeill on September 21, 2022, 09:45:38 PM
Quote from: JoG2 on September 21, 2022, 08:22:57 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on September 21, 2022, 08:00:40 PM
Quote from: Aristo 60 on September 21, 2022, 07:36:25 PM
It didn't seem to take a fizz out of the british public that he conned his wife for 30 odd years but he skips one measly queue...........

It is OK to con your wife if you turn to perversion, if he had left her for a younger woman then you would never have heard the end of it.

What perversion did he turn to?

Them there webuyanycar.com adverts.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: johnnycool on September 22, 2022, 08:18:38 AM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 08:23:16 PM
Quote from: Aristo 60 on September 21, 2022, 07:36:25 PM
It didn't seem to take a fizz out of the british public that he conned his wife for 30 odd years but he skips one measly queue...........

Ah but he was so brave that he could   be true to himself. And live on tv too.   When in reality he  was about to be outed , so got his  poor sob story in first .

Not one word about the wife or kids and  the turmoil they were  in

Took up with a man a lot younger to the extent as to the lads age when they first were alleged to be together is a tad dodgy...
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: Rudi on September 22, 2022, 09:43:38 AM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 08:23:16 PM
Quote from: Aristo 60 on September 21, 2022, 07:36:25 PM
It didn't seem to take a fizz out of the british public that he conned his wife for 30 odd years but he skips one measly queue...........

Ah but he was so brave that he could   be true to himself. And live on tv too.   When in reality he  was about to be outed , so got his  poor sob story in first .

Not one word about the wife or kids and  the turmoil they were  in

If ever a kunt should be cancelled, disgusting what he did to his wife & family. But sure he was soooo brave.
Title: King Charles III
Post by: trailer on May 04, 2023, 10:08:33 AM
Changed the thread so we can discuss all things Charlie.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on May 04, 2023, 11:17:10 AM
Quote from: trailer on May 04, 2023, 10:08:33 AM
Changed the thread so we can discuss all things Charlie.

Should have closed it. F all to discuss.
Title: Re: Queen Elizabeth II 1926 - 2022
Post by: quit yo jibbajabba on May 04, 2023, 11:21:44 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on September 22, 2022, 08:18:38 AM
Quote from: AustinPowers on September 21, 2022, 08:23:16 PM
Quote from: Aristo 60 on September 21, 2022, 07:36:25 PM
It didn't seem to take a fizz out of the british public that he conned his wife for 30 odd years but he skips one measly queue...........

Ah but he was so brave that he could   be true to himself. And live on tv too.   When in reality he  was about to be outed , so got his  poor sob story in first .

Not one word about the wife or kids and  the turmoil they were  in

Took up with a man a lot younger to the extent as to the lads age when they first were alleged to be together is a tad dodgy...

If only Gordon the Gopher could talk is alls im sayin
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: trailer on May 04, 2023, 11:53:34 AM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on May 04, 2023, 11:17:10 AM
Quote from: trailer on May 04, 2023, 10:08:33 AM
Changed the thread so we can discuss all things Charlie.

Should have closed it. F all to discuss.

Au Contraire. What about the obnoxious cost to crown a serial adulterer the King of the Brits when cuts to services are so deep?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: GJL on May 04, 2023, 02:00:46 PM
RTE showing it live!  Maybe I should post this in the WTF section?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on May 04, 2023, 02:17:45 PM
Quote from: GJL on May 04, 2023, 02:00:46 PM
RTE showing it live!  Maybe I should post this in the WTF section?

Why though?  It's a moment in history that will have many people on this island glued,  the same as the Queens funeral. Whether we like it or not a large portion of people in Ireland are heavily influenced by and interested in what happens across the water. You don't have to agree with it not to be interested in it.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: AustinPowers on May 04, 2023, 02:18:31 PM
Quote from: GJL on May 04, 2023, 02:00:46 PM
RTE showing it live!  Maybe I should post this in the WTF section?

Well there's  a shock!  ::)
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: armaghniac on May 04, 2023, 04:03:38 PM
Quote from: GJL on May 04, 2023, 02:00:46 PM
RTE showing it live!  Maybe I should post this in the WTF section?

They also showed the US Presidential inauguration, did they not?
These kind of events are cheap TV, I recall Andropov's funeral being on years ago.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: seafoid on May 04, 2023, 05:07:58 PM
Quote from: AustinPowers on May 04, 2023, 02:18:31 PM
Quote from: GJL on May 04, 2023, 02:00:46 PM
RTE showing it live!  Maybe I should post this in the WTF section?

Well there's  a shock!  ::)
Why isn't it on GAAGO?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: armaghniac on May 04, 2023, 05:34:12 PM
Quote from: seafoid on May 04, 2023, 05:07:58 PM
Quote from: AustinPowers on May 04, 2023, 02:18:31 PM
Quote from: GJL on May 04, 2023, 02:00:46 PM
RTE showing it live!  Maybe I should post this in the WTF section?

Well there's  a shock!  ::)
Why isn't it on GAAGO?

Because it isn't football or hurling?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: LC on May 04, 2023, 06:29:01 PM
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2023/05/03/news/dup_councillor_demands_primark_stock_coronation_items_vital_for_celebration-3253523/

Who cares about cost of living, budget cuts, state of the health service etc...................you can always rely on these clowns to show what their real priorities are.

Apparently John Hume said years ago ' you cant eat a flag' he was not far wrong.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Armamike on May 04, 2023, 06:55:53 PM
Quote from: LC on May 04, 2023, 06:29:01 PM
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2023/05/03/news/dup_councillor_demands_primark_stock_coronation_items_vital_for_celebration-3253523/

Who cares about cost of living, budget cuts, state of the health service etc...................you can always rely on these clowns to show what their real priorities are.

Apparently John Hume said years ago ' you cant eat a flag' he was not far wrong.

Somebody with too much time on his hands.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: marty34 on May 04, 2023, 06:58:26 PM
Quote from: LC on May 04, 2023, 06:29:01 PM
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2023/05/03/news/dup_councillor_demands_primark_stock_coronation_items_vital_for_celebration-3253523/

Who cares about cost of living, budget cuts, state of the health service etc...................you can always rely on these clowns to show what their real priorities are.

Apparently John Hume said years ago ' you cant eat a flag' he was not far wrong.

I presume that's that lad's living room in the photo. Crazy stuff.

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: J70 on May 04, 2023, 08:04:22 PM
Quote from: LC on May 04, 2023, 06:29:01 PM
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2023/05/03/news/dup_councillor_demands_primark_stock_coronation_items_vital_for_celebration-3253523/

Who cares about cost of living, budget cuts, state of the health service etc...................you can always rely on these clowns to show what their real priorities are.

Apparently John Hume said years ago ' you cant eat a flag' he was not far wrong.

I'm sure they can get their tacky shirts and hats from other shops. I'd imagine street vendors will be doing a roaring trade. You should see the range of stuff they pull out of the woodwork to sell on NYC streets on Paddy's Day.

Anything to play the victim.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: pbat on May 04, 2023, 08:19:50 PM
Heard a clip on BBC news last night the correspondent reckoned George will never make king. Surprised to hear that, very surprised to hear it on the BBC. Tide must be changing on the main land.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: clarshack on May 04, 2023, 08:33:14 PM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.

+1
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: johnnycool on May 04, 2023, 10:24:36 PM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.

Born to rule over them....

The class system depends on Royalty to head it.
It's the poor buggers who can hardly feed themselves but take some sort of joy out of watching royal weddings, funerals, coronations with a sense of pride that takes me to the cleaners
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: ONeill on May 05, 2023, 12:05:15 AM
Good to see more people not buying into the 'glued in' nature of this event.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: general_lee on May 05, 2023, 09:34:46 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.
I understand it in a local context in that bootlicking the royals is part of their cultural identity and they're that insecure and stupid when it comes to identity that they don't even question it - what could be more British than loving the royal family? Never mind having a pot to piss in or not. It is still  warped and i find it genuinely sad how many people from working class backgrounds succumb to this shit.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Brendan on May 05, 2023, 10:14:49 AM
Being in and out of many loyalist estates for my work I see some of the poverty they experience, the same as nationalists areas of course, but yesterday seen a house all decorated for the coronation, flegs with Charlie on them and bunting etc but they had left a placard in the window asking for fair pay for nurses...
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: armaghniac on May 05, 2023, 10:23:55 AM
Quote from: general_lee on May 05, 2023, 09:34:46 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.
I understand it in a local context in that bootlicking the royals is part of their cultural identity and they're that insecure and stupid when it comes to identity that they don't even question it - what could be more British than loving the royal family? Never mind having a pot to piss in or not. It is still  warped and i find it genuinely sad how many people from working class backgrounds succumb to this shit.

People in the US voted for Trump, people watch the Kardashians etc on TV. Look at all the people lick arsing Trump in Doonbeg.
If there was no Coronation the cost distributed across all of the poor people in the UK would hardly buy a drink for each one.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: imtommygunn on May 05, 2023, 10:33:34 AM
Yeah I would agree with that. I couldn't give a shite about the coronation but it's not the royals putting so many people into the UK into poverty - it's the tory party. If the coronation wasn't happening it's not like the money would be spent on poorer people.  It's great to see them decimated at those council elections but I still don't get why anyone would vote for them.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: GJL on May 05, 2023, 11:04:04 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on May 04, 2023, 02:17:45 PM
Quote from: GJL on May 04, 2023, 02:00:46 PM
RTE showing it live!  Maybe I should post this in the WTF section?

Why though?  It's a moment in history that will have many people on this island glued,  the same as the Queens funeral. Whether we like it or not a large portion of people in Ireland are heavily influenced by and interested in what happens across the water. You don't have to agree with it not to be interested in it.

Four hours of dedicated coverage? Really?

Give your head a wobble. If people want to see it there are plenty of other channels showing it.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Piskin on May 06, 2023, 02:29:59 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.

It boggles the mind alright.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: downtothecore on May 06, 2023, 07:35:14 AM
The reality is that the support for the monarchy is dwindling at a very fast rate in England so it has to be a matter of time until these folks start to catch themselves on and direct more of their finances at projects that support the mainly diverse population and culture of their land.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: laoislad on May 06, 2023, 08:50:56 AM
Quote from: Piskin on May 06, 2023, 02:29:59 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.

It boggles the mind alright.
Nearly as bad as there being a 21 page thread about them on the gaaboard...
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Tony Baloney on May 06, 2023, 08:56:03 AM
Quote from: laoislad on May 06, 2023, 08:50:56 AM
Quote from: Piskin on May 06, 2023, 02:29:59 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.

It boggles the mind alright.
Nearly as bad as there being a 21 page thread about them on the gaaboard...
The people of Laois still mourning their Queen?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Nanderson on May 06, 2023, 10:29:59 AM
Some amount of horse shit left on the mall
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: AustinPowers on May 06, 2023, 10:48:43 AM
Quote from: Nanderson on May 06, 2023, 10:29:59 AM
Some amount of horse shit left on the mall

I'd say  all those  horses are making  some mess too!
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: trailer on May 06, 2023, 11:09:10 AM
See Michelle O'Neill on the TV there the big sellout. What a stoop!
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Mikhail Prokhorov on May 06, 2023, 11:11:54 AM
Quote from: laoislad on May 06, 2023, 08:50:56 AM
Quote from: Piskin on May 06, 2023, 02:29:59 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.

It boggles the mind alright.
Nearly as bad as there being a 21 page thread about them on the gaaboard...

not surprised at all, most of this board seem to be watching it too  ::)
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: anportmorforjfc on May 06, 2023, 11:38:46 AM
Why is the whole coronation being shown on RTE? I don't get it, would it have a channel dedicated in France or Spain? Or maybe I'm completely off on this  :o
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: dec on May 06, 2023, 12:19:15 PM
In the US


ABC CBS NBC Fox CNN MSNBC and Fox News are all showing it
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: RedHand88 on May 06, 2023, 12:35:33 PM
Quote from: anportmorforjfc on May 06, 2023, 11:38:46 AM
Why is the whole coronation being shown on RTE? I don't get it, would it have a channel dedicated in France or Spain? Or maybe I'm completely off on this  :o

Women love it. The fashion, the pageantry, the drama of the prodigal son and all that stuff. I'm working in Meath today with a girl who's gutted she's missing it.
I'd say RTEs viewing figures will be big.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: armaghniac on May 06, 2023, 01:19:11 PM
I haven't seen such a big part of the British Army in one place since the operation to upgrade the barracks in Cross' 29 years ago.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Horse Box on May 06, 2023, 02:40:34 PM
Peaceful Republic protesters ( British ones ) arrested and Banners confiscated near the coranation . Between 20,000 and 50,000 Pro Independence people marching in Glasgow today !
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Saffrongael on May 06, 2023, 03:37:30 PM
Quote from: Horse Box on May 06, 2023, 02:40:34 PM
Peaceful Republic protesters ( British ones ) arrested and Banners confiscated near the coranation . Between 20,000 and 50,000 Pro Independence people marching in Glasgow today !

Why would you be bothered ?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Armagh18 on May 06, 2023, 03:48:30 PM
Quote from: Saffrongael on May 06, 2023, 03:37:30 PM
Quote from: Horse Box on May 06, 2023, 02:40:34 PM
Peaceful Republic protesters ( British ones ) arrested and Banners confiscated near the coranation . Between 20,000 and 50,000 Pro Independence people marching in Glasgow today !

Why would you be bothered ?
bothered arresting them? Or protesting?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Horse Box on May 06, 2023, 05:24:35 PM
Quote from: Saffrongael on May 06, 2023, 03:37:30 PM
Quote from: Horse Box on May 06, 2023, 02:40:34 PM
Peaceful Republic protesters ( British ones ) arrested and Banners confiscated near the coranation . Between 20,000 and 50,000 Pro Independence people marching in Glasgow today !

Why would you be bothered ?

?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Piskin on May 06, 2023, 06:19:19 PM
Quote from: laoislad on May 06, 2023, 08:50:56 AM
Quote from: Piskin on May 06, 2023, 02:29:59 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.

It boggles the mind alright.

For sure....
Nearly as bad as there being a 21 page thread about them on the gaaboard...
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: clarshack on May 06, 2023, 06:30:25 PM
How did Michelle get on?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: red hander on May 06, 2023, 07:21:12 PM
Quote from: Saffrongael on May 06, 2023, 03:37:30 PM
Quote from: Horse Box on May 06, 2023, 02:40:34 PM
Peaceful Republic protesters ( British ones ) arrested and Banners confiscated near the coranation . Between 20,000 and 50,000 Pro Independence people marching in Glasgow today !

Why would you be bothered ?

I dunno, but I'll hazard a guess. Maybe they want an end to monarchy and decided that circus in London was the perfect opportunity to express their legitimate point of view in a peaceful way. The fact they were arrested suggests maybe they have a point. What about yourself, what do you think?  Ach, sure Rosa Parks, maybe she shouldn't have bothered her hole either.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: seafoid on May 06, 2023, 07:50:14 PM
One quarter of Brits can't afford to save 10 quid a month. The ceremony should have been scaled down.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: laoislad on May 06, 2023, 07:58:01 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on May 06, 2023, 08:56:03 AM
Quote from: laoislad on May 06, 2023, 08:50:56 AM
Quote from: Piskin on May 06, 2023, 02:29:59 AM
Quote from: Armagh18 on May 04, 2023, 08:17:09 PM
What sort of small minded mentality must they have to worship billionaires who look down on them from priceless golden thrones while people are starving on the streets? I'll honestly never get it.

It boggles the mind alright.
Nearly as bad as there being a 21 page thread about them on the gaaboard...
The people of Laois still mourning their Queen?
It's the Biffos turn now...
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Wildweasel74 on May 06, 2023, 08:16:25 PM
Not to worried, only plus is I got Monday off.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: smelmoth on May 06, 2023, 09:31:13 PM
Quote from: seafoid on May 06, 2023, 07:50:14 PM
One quarter of Brits can't afford to save 10 quid a month. The ceremony should have been scaled down.
absolutely. And while the whole thing is batsh1t the King did want it scaled back and the government said no. They wanted the full scale regalia
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Capt Pat on May 06, 2023, 10:24:12 PM
There should be another one of these in 20 or so years. I don't see Charles going on like Liz.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Ed Ricketts on May 06, 2023, 10:30:35 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on May 06, 2023, 10:24:12 PM
There should be another one of these in 20 or so years. I don't see Charles going on like Liz.

Unlikely to make it to 143, alright.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Tony Baloney on May 06, 2023, 11:51:42 PM
Quote from: Ed Ricketts on May 06, 2023, 10:30:35 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on May 06, 2023, 10:24:12 PM
There should be another one of these in 20 or so years. I don't see Charles going on like Liz.

Unlikely to make it to 143, alright.
Fair point  ;D
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Captain Obvious on May 07, 2023, 12:53:55 AM
The main highlights for those that missed it.

https://youtu.be/bv7f-oyXIRs
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: armaghniac on May 07, 2023, 01:15:49 AM
It has been a long time since there was a Coronation before, but it is still less than since Mayo won the All Ireland.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Blowitupref on February 05, 2024, 06:40:41 PM
Has been diagnosed with a form of cancer, Buckingham Palace has announced.

The palace confirmed the disease, which is not prostate cancer, was discovered while he was being treated in hospital for an enlarged prostate.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Sportacus on February 05, 2024, 07:55:57 PM
Well, hope he makes a good recovery. Can't think of a family untouched.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Capt Pat on February 05, 2024, 11:39:51 PM
I said at the time we wouldn't be waiting 70 years for another coronation. I didn't think it would be this quick.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Eamonnca1 on February 05, 2024, 11:44:26 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on February 05, 2024, 11:39:51 PMI said at the time we wouldn't be waiting 70 years for another coronation. I didn't think it would be this quick.

Bit early to say. Although it's interesting that they haven't yet revealed what type of cancer it is. I wonder why.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: AustinPowers on February 06, 2024, 12:48:10 AM
I wonder how close this  fella will be

https://www.indiatimes.com/trending/social-relevance/man-predicted-queen-death-date-also-predicted-it-for-king-charles-579547.html (https://www.indiatimes.com/trending/social-relevance/man-predicted-queen-death-date-also-predicted-it-for-king-charles-579547.html)

28 March 2026. Remember  the date
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: RedHand88 on February 06, 2024, 06:25:50 AM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on February 05, 2024, 11:44:26 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on February 05, 2024, 11:39:51 PMI said at the time we wouldn't be waiting 70 years for another coronation. I didn't think it would be this quick.

Bit early to say. Although it's interesting that they haven't yet revealed what type of cancer it is. I wonder why.

Probably because people would be straight to Google to see what the average survival rate is.
If its something that was noticed during a prostate exam but is not prostate exam id guess its some sort of colorectal cancer.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Dougal Maguire on February 06, 2024, 08:54:12 AM
Quote from: Capt Pat on February 05, 2024, 11:39:51 PMI said at the time we wouldn't be waiting 70 years for another coronation. I didn't think it would be this quick.
Well in fairness you wouldn't need to be Russell Grant to make a prediction like that given that he was over 74 when he was crowned😂
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: trailer on February 06, 2024, 10:12:02 AM
Wishing King Charles all the best. Wealth nor creed is any protection from cancer.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: johnnycool on February 06, 2024, 10:30:36 AM
Quote from: trailer on February 06, 2024, 10:12:02 AMWishing King Charles all the best. Wealth nor creed is any protection from cancer.

It isn't but he'll be on no waiting list for Chemo, that's for sure.

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: tonto1888 on February 06, 2024, 10:44:43 AM
Quote from: trailer on February 06, 2024, 10:12:02 AMWishing King Charles all the best. Wealth nor creed is any protection from cancer.

I am no royalist and no supporter of him but I am a supporter of people fighting cancer - my father's fight was unsuccessful sadly. I hope he beats it
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Milltown Row2 on February 06, 2024, 10:49:23 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on February 06, 2024, 10:30:36 AM
Quote from: trailer on February 06, 2024, 10:12:02 AMWishing King Charles all the best. Wealth nor creed is any protection from cancer.

It isn't but he'll be on no waiting list for Chemo, that's for sure.



To be fair, both my dad and sister didn't wait either, and that was at the height of Covid
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: tbrick18 on February 06, 2024, 11:15:38 AM
I'm no royalist, but Cancer diagnosis is devastating to anyone and to any family.
On a personal level, I hope its a successful outcome.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Ball Hopper on February 07, 2024, 06:36:11 AM
Wouldn't be a royalist either, but I hope cancer patients everywhere can summon the strength to fight this disease that has no limit in its reach. 

Odd that it might get the family talking again, but it's strange how things happen.

There have been huge strides in recent years/decades with regard to various treatments and early detection, but plenty more to do.

I wish him and all cancer sufferers (including family members) all the best for the future.

Four and a half years almost since my diagnosis and I'm not quite back to normal yet.  Another 18 months of tests/scans and colonoscopy before I'm discharged as a cancer patient and return to "regular" screening.

Time for anyone overdue a check-up to start making that appointment...it can strike anyone.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: seafoid on February 07, 2024, 10:28:57 AM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on February 05, 2024, 11:44:26 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on February 05, 2024, 11:39:51 PMI said at the time we wouldn't be waiting 70 years for another coronation. I didn't think it would be this quick.

Bit early to say. Although it's interesting that they haven't yet revealed what type of cancer it is. I wonder why.
Because the Royals like a bit of mystery. Otherwise what else is there ? Brits are awful hoors for Royalty.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Milltown Row2 on February 07, 2024, 12:34:04 PM
Maybe the don't want the press and Joe public googling the type of cancer and coming to all sorts of conclusions?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: imtommygunn on February 07, 2024, 12:36:50 PM
Piers Morgan is outraged  ???

Needs some privacy somewhere surely.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: RedHand88 on February 07, 2024, 12:39:04 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on February 05, 2024, 11:39:51 PMI said at the time we wouldn't be waiting 70 years for another coronation. I didn't think it would be this quick.

So you predicted he wouldn't live to 145.

 Is that you Nostrodamus?  ;D
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: AustinPowers on February 07, 2024, 12:53:18 PM
Quote from: seafoid on February 07, 2024, 10:28:57 AM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on February 05, 2024, 11:44:26 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on February 05, 2024, 11:39:51 PMI said at the time we wouldn't be waiting 70 years for another coronation. I didn't think it would be this quick.

Bit early to say. Although it's interesting that they haven't yet revealed what type of cancer it is. I wonder why.
Because the Royals like a bit of mystery. Otherwise what else is there ? Brits are awful hoors for Royalty.

It's not just the  Brits

https://www.newstalk.com/podcasts/highlights-from-newstalk-breakfast/prince-harrys-book-sales-breaks-records-in-ireland

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/royal-wedding-draws-1-3m-irish-viewers-1.875777
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: seafoid on February 07, 2024, 03:17:58 PM
Quote from: AustinPowers on February 07, 2024, 12:53:18 PM
Quote from: seafoid on February 07, 2024, 10:28:57 AM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on February 05, 2024, 11:44:26 PM
Quote from: Capt Pat on February 05, 2024, 11:39:51 PMI said at the time we wouldn't be waiting 70 years for another coronation. I didn't think it would be this quick.

Bit early to say. Although it's interesting that they haven't yet revealed what type of cancer it is. I wonder why.
Because the Royals like a bit of mystery. Otherwise what else is there ? Brits are awful hoors for Royalty.

It's not just the  Brits

https://www.newstalk.com/podcasts/highlights-from-newstalk-breakfast/prince-harrys-book-sales-breaks-records-in-ireland

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/royal-wedding-draws-1-3m-irish-viewers-1.875777
Shoneens
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Captain Obvious on February 07, 2024, 05:23:59 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on February 07, 2024, 12:36:50 PMPiers Morgan is outraged  ???

Needs some privacy somewhere surely.

That tabloid nonsense channel he's on GB news is blaming Meghan and Harry for Charles current health problems.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: trailer on February 08, 2024, 05:19:57 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on February 07, 2024, 05:23:59 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on February 07, 2024, 12:36:50 PMPiers Morgan is outraged  ???

Needs some privacy somewhere surely.

That tabloid nonsense channel he's on GB news is blaming Meghan and Harry for Charles current health problems.

Is Morgan on GB news? I think it's Talk TV.
Morgan is an arsehole (who claims he's Irish) but I don't think he's a GB news arsehole
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: imtommygunn on February 08, 2024, 06:49:12 PM
Yeah don't think he's gb news though still pretty odious. Someone said after he expressed outrage at not knowing that he should hack his phone and find out ;D
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: clarshack on February 28, 2024, 10:16:38 AM
What is going on with the Royal Family?

Charles has cancer

There's been another Royal Death (Thomas Kingston)

But the big question is Where is Kate Middleton?

Some of the theories on Kate lol:
https://x.com/MadihaBlob/status/1762435851638747482?s=20

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Hereiam on February 28, 2024, 10:35:02 AM
I'm going to say this with the greatest respect "who gives a flying fcuk about them"
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Milltown Row2 on February 28, 2024, 10:41:33 AM
Quote from: Hereiam on February 28, 2024, 10:35:02 AMI'm going to say this with the greatest respect "who gives a flying fcuk about them"

Going by the amount of world wide press they get, a lot?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: imtommygunn on February 28, 2024, 10:48:36 AM
Only realised about the kate middleton gone missing stuff yesterday. I don't pay much heed but there is some funny stuff on it. (Not seen since something like december the 23rd allegedly)
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: seafoid on February 28, 2024, 10:56:17 AM
Quote from: trailer on February 08, 2024, 05:19:57 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on February 07, 2024, 05:23:59 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on February 07, 2024, 12:36:50 PMPiers Morgan is outraged  ???

Needs some privacy somewhere surely.

That tabloid nonsense channel he's on GB news is blaming Meghan and Harry for Charles current health problems.

Is Morgan on GB news? I think it's Talk TV.
Morgan is an arsehole (who claims he's Irish) but I don't think he's a GB news arsehole
His father was from Offaly
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: seafoid on February 28, 2024, 11:45:00 AM
Quote from: imtommygunn on February 28, 2024, 10:48:36 AMOnly realised about the kate middleton gone missing stuff yesterday. I don't pay much heed but there is some funny stuff on it. (Not seen since something like december the 23rd allegedly)
She must be training for the round robin
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Taylor on February 28, 2024, 12:20:14 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on February 28, 2024, 10:48:36 AMOnly realised about the kate middleton gone missing stuff yesterday. I don't pay much heed but there is some funny stuff on it. (Not seen since something like december the 23rd allegedly)

Probably getting a tummy tuck after the birth of the kids.

Would put her out of action for some time
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Orior on February 28, 2024, 12:29:19 PM
Quote from: seafoid on February 28, 2024, 10:56:17 AM
Quote from: trailer on February 08, 2024, 05:19:57 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on February 07, 2024, 05:23:59 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on February 07, 2024, 12:36:50 PMPiers Morgan is outraged  ???

Needs some privacy somewhere surely.

That tabloid nonsense channel he's on GB news is blaming Meghan and Harry for Charles current health problems.

Is Morgan on GB news? I think it's Talk TV.
Morgan is an arsehole (who claims he's Irish) but I don't think he's a GB news arsehole
His father was from Offaly

Well there ye go, lol.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: AustinPowers on February 28, 2024, 01:26:55 PM
Quote from: Taylor on February 28, 2024, 12:20:14 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on February 28, 2024, 10:48:36 AMOnly realised about the kate middleton gone missing stuff yesterday. I don't pay much heed but there is some funny stuff on it. (Not seen since something like december the 23rd allegedly)

Probably getting a tummy tuck after the birth of the kids.

Would put her out of action for some time

Maybe Wills gave her the same treatment as Harry got.  Pointing a finger at her  before pushing  her  to  the floor and breaking the dog bowl
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: SaffronSports on February 28, 2024, 03:30:30 PM
Quote from: clarshack on February 28, 2024, 10:16:38 AMWhat is going on with the Royal Family?

Charles has cancer

There's been another Royal Death (Thomas Kingston)

But the big question is Where is Kate Middleton?

Some of the theories on Kate lol:
https://x.com/MadihaBlob/status/1762435851638747482?s=20



I do like a conspiracy theory. A few days ago William pulled out of some function due to personal reasons so that should keep the tin hat brigade busy.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Main Street on February 28, 2024, 04:54:21 PM
I turned on ITV news yesterday evening and was expecting updates on all important troubled spots in the world but lo and behold the top news items were all about the Royals and the death of this 535th in line to the throne.
Found dead alone, no others involved? hmmm,
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: johnnycool on February 28, 2024, 05:17:59 PM
Quote from: Main Street on February 28, 2024, 04:54:21 PMI turned on ITV news yesterday evening and was expecting updates on all important troubled spots in the world but lo and behold the top news items were all about the Royals and the death of this 535th in line to the throne.
Found dead alone, no others involved? hmmm,

One of the Rothschilds kicked the bucket as well over the weekend, closely connected to the Royals allegedly.

Tough time for the house of Windsor, thoughts and prayers with them at this time!
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: An Astrail on February 29, 2024, 04:39:01 AM
Quote from: seafoid on February 28, 2024, 10:56:17 AM
Quote from: trailer on February 08, 2024, 05:19:57 PM
Quote from: Captain Obvious on February 07, 2024, 05:23:59 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on February 07, 2024, 12:36:50 PMPiers Morgan is outraged  ???

Needs some privacy somewhere surely.

That tabloid nonsense channel he's on GB news is blaming Meghan and Harry for Charles current health problems.

Is Morgan on GB news? I think it's Talk TV.
Morgan is an arsehole (who claims he's Irish) but I don't think he's a GB news arsehole
His father was from Offaly

Or possibly Galway...
https://www.galwaybeo.ie/news/galway-news/piersmorgan-irishpubs-life-twitter-news-6482600
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Main Street on March 01, 2024, 08:11:36 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on February 28, 2024, 05:17:59 PM
Quote from: Main Street on February 28, 2024, 04:54:21 PMI turned on ITV news yesterday evening and was expecting updates on all important troubled spots in the world but lo and behold the top news items were all about the Royals and the death of this 535th in line to the throne.
Found dead alone, no others involved? hmmm,

One of the Rothschilds kicked the bucket as well over the weekend, closely connected to the Royals allegedly.

Tough time for the house of Windsor, thoughts and prayers with them at this time!
It turns out he didn't die alone but alongside him lay his trusty shotgun. There's nothing suspicious as regards the death which was due to the large part of his head being blown to smithereens.
Could this spark off copycat suicides, with the Werther effect running rampant through the Royals and their followers?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: quit yo jibbajabba on March 01, 2024, 09:08:18 PM
Died from a "traumatic head wound" with a gun nearby


Or suicide if you were in the lower classes
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: armaghniac on March 11, 2024, 12:03:23 AM
It appears that the HRH's have been fiddling their photos
very silly

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIV82ZfW0AASKdr?format=jpg&name=large)

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: clarshack on March 11, 2024, 12:19:26 AM
Quote from: armaghniac on March 11, 2024, 12:03:23 AMIt appears that the HRH's have been fiddling their photos
very silly

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIV82ZfW0AASKdr?format=jpg&name=large)



Regardless of the bad photoshop job that pic could have been taken anytime. They really do think the peasants are stupid.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: armaghniac on March 11, 2024, 12:55:02 AM
Well the leaves are on the trees....
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Nanderson on March 11, 2024, 07:07:42 AM
Quote from: clarshack on March 11, 2024, 12:19:26 AM
Quote from: armaghniac on March 11, 2024, 12:03:23 AMIt appears that the HRH's have been fiddling their photos
very silly

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIV82ZfW0AASKdr?format=jpg&name=large)



Regardless of the bad photoshop job that pic could have been taken anytime. They really do think the peasants are stupid.
I've seen a good theory that she's actually in a wheelchair and they've photoshopped her into that garden seat very poorly.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Milltown Row2 on March 11, 2024, 07:27:28 AM
The interest on the GAA board is high
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: RedHand88 on March 11, 2024, 09:03:52 AM
This is getting stranger and stranger.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: johnnycool on March 11, 2024, 09:07:05 AM
Quote from: RedHand88 on March 11, 2024, 09:03:52 AMThis is getting stranger and stranger.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIWUB6_W8AApxDG?format=jpg&name=small)

 ;D
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: seafoid on March 11, 2024, 01:18:54 PM
She has either put on a load of weight or had a very bad facelift

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BL58K-3XGKs
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: johnnycool on March 11, 2024, 01:54:20 PM
Quote from: seafoid on March 11, 2024, 01:18:54 PMShe has either put on a load of weight or had a very bad facelift

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BL58K-3XGKs

Gotta love those links SF  ;D

They've now admitted that the picture was "Edited" but won't be releasing the original.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kVgb5aPhDQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kVgb5aPhDQ)
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Milltown Row2 on March 11, 2024, 03:10:18 PM
Had to laugh at the media that cancelled the photos as they are 'edited' The bastions of honest reporting!

Phone tapping is ok though ;D
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: weareros on March 11, 2024, 03:23:43 PM
Kate appears to have done more chopping off of arms and hands than King Henry VIII did to heads of his wives.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: AustinPowers on March 11, 2024, 03:55:41 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 11, 2024, 09:07:05 AM
Quote from: RedHand88 on March 11, 2024, 09:03:52 AMThis is getting stranger and stranger.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GIWUB6_W8AApxDG?format=jpg&name=small)

 ;D

That's creepy ...and hilarious

Somebody was  saying she was spotted recently  in a motor with a new face. Or maybe  they have bumped her off , and they'll try and  replace her  without anyone noticing , like this...

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Captain Obvious on March 11, 2024, 04:19:19 PM
A recent photo of Kate Middleton out for a walk.

(https://cdn.outsideonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/08/bigfoot-roger-patterson-1_h.jpg?crop=16:9&width=960&enable=upscale&quality=100)
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: clarshack on March 11, 2024, 06:33:42 PM
https://x.com/moriartyprofj23/status/1767190735890063627

As good a theory as any I suppose...
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on March 11, 2024, 10:20:39 PM
Why would anyone edit a photo in the way this was done. Doesn't make sense. Applying a filter etc doesn't introduce inconsistencies to the image like the ones here. It would be some serious image manipulation such as adding people into a picture that would introduce these types of anomalies. 
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: johnnycool on March 13, 2024, 11:42:31 AM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 11, 2024, 10:20:39 PMWhy would anyone edit a photo in the way this was done. Doesn't make sense. Applying a filter etc doesn't introduce inconsistencies to the image like the ones here. It would be some serious image manipulation such as adding people into a picture that would introduce these types of anomalies. 

Some soap opera all the same.

And it turns out the one they put out of them together in the Range Rover is doctored as well.

Some GCSE graphics student on placement in Kensington Palace is getting the boot.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: 93-DY-SAM on March 13, 2024, 12:39:27 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 13, 2024, 11:42:31 AM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 11, 2024, 10:20:39 PMWhy would anyone edit a photo in the way this was done. Doesn't make sense. Applying a filter etc doesn't introduce inconsistencies to the image like the ones here. It would be some serious image manipulation such as adding people into a picture that would introduce these types of anomalies. 

Some soap opera all the same.

And it turns out the one they put out of them together in the Range Rover is doctored as well.

Some GCSE graphics student on placement in Kensington Palace is getting the boot.


I normally couldn't give two shites about them and wouldn't walk to the back door to see any of them but am interested in this in the hope that I'm witnessing an implosion and the start of the end of days of the British Royal family. Be another blow to the Union!
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: brokencrossbar1 on March 13, 2024, 01:13:06 PM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 13, 2024, 12:39:27 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 13, 2024, 11:42:31 AM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 11, 2024, 10:20:39 PMWhy would anyone edit a photo in the way this was done. Doesn't make sense. Applying a filter etc doesn't introduce inconsistencies to the image like the ones here. It would be some serious image manipulation such as adding people into a picture that would introduce these types of anomalies. 

Some soap opera all the same.

And it turns out the one they put out of them together in the Range Rover is doctored as well.

Some GCSE graphics student on placement in Kensington Palace is getting the boot.


I normally couldn't give two shites about them and wouldn't walk to the back door to see any of them but am interested in this in the hope that I'm witnessing an implosion and the start of the end of days of the British Royal family. Be another blow to the Union!

I think you could be right about that. This is really turning out to be a complete disaster.

The funny thing is the next decade could see the dissolution of the Union and the sidelining of the Royal family. The likelihood is that this will be overseen by a Labour government....is that a good thing for them politically?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: johnnycool on March 13, 2024, 01:17:32 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on March 13, 2024, 01:13:06 PM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 13, 2024, 12:39:27 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 13, 2024, 11:42:31 AM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 11, 2024, 10:20:39 PMWhy would anyone edit a photo in the way this was done. Doesn't make sense. Applying a filter etc doesn't introduce inconsistencies to the image like the ones here. It would be some serious image manipulation such as adding people into a picture that would introduce these types of anomalies. 

Some soap opera all the same.

And it turns out the one they put out of them together in the Range Rover is doctored as well.

Some GCSE graphics student on placement in Kensington Palace is getting the boot.


I normally couldn't give two shites about them and wouldn't walk to the back door to see any of them but am interested in this in the hope that I'm witnessing an implosion and the start of the end of days of the British Royal family. Be another blow to the Union!

I think you could be right about that. This is really turning out to be a complete disaster.

The funny thing is the next decade could see the dissolution of the Union and the sidelining of the Royal family. The likelihood is that this will be overseen by a Labour government....is that a good thing for them politically?

The British class system depends on the Royals, it's hard to see where it goes from here if Charles pops the clogs in the next year or so.

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: NAG1 on March 13, 2024, 01:19:05 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 13, 2024, 01:17:32 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on March 13, 2024, 01:13:06 PM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 13, 2024, 12:39:27 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 13, 2024, 11:42:31 AM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 11, 2024, 10:20:39 PMWhy would anyone edit a photo in the way this was done. Doesn't make sense. Applying a filter etc doesn't introduce inconsistencies to the image like the ones here. It would be some serious image manipulation such as adding people into a picture that would introduce these types of anomalies. 

Some soap opera all the same.

And it turns out the one they put out of them together in the Range Rover is doctored as well.

Some GCSE graphics student on placement in Kensington Palace is getting the boot.


I normally couldn't give two shites about them and wouldn't walk to the back door to see any of them but am interested in this in the hope that I'm witnessing an implosion and the start of the end of days of the British Royal family. Be another blow to the Union!

I think you could be right about that. This is really turning out to be a complete disaster.

The funny thing is the next decade could see the dissolution of the Union and the sidelining of the Royal family. The likelihood is that this will be overseen by a Labour government....is that a good thing for them politically?

The British class system depends on the Royals, it's hard to see where it goes from here if Charles pops the clogs in the next year or so.



Don't think Labour will need to go near it, once Charles goes it will start to happen naturally. Eventually they will end up like the Royals in European countries, on the side lines.

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Milltown Row2 on March 13, 2024, 02:28:58 PM
Quote from: NAG1 on March 13, 2024, 01:19:05 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 13, 2024, 01:17:32 PM
Quote from: brokencrossbar1 on March 13, 2024, 01:13:06 PM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 13, 2024, 12:39:27 PM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 13, 2024, 11:42:31 AM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on March 11, 2024, 10:20:39 PMWhy would anyone edit a photo in the way this was done. Doesn't make sense. Applying a filter etc doesn't introduce inconsistencies to the image like the ones here. It would be some serious image manipulation such as adding people into a picture that would introduce these types of anomalies. 

Some soap opera all the same.

And it turns out the one they put out of them together in the Range Rover is doctored as well.

Some GCSE graphics student on placement in Kensington Palace is getting the boot.


I normally couldn't give two shites about them and wouldn't walk to the back door to see any of them but am interested in this in the hope that I'm witnessing an implosion and the start of the end of days of the British Royal family. Be another blow to the Union!

I think you could be right about that. This is really turning out to be a complete disaster.

The funny thing is the next decade could see the dissolution of the Union and the sidelining of the Royal family. The likelihood is that this will be overseen by a Labour government....is that a good thing for them politically?

The British class system depends on the Royals, it's hard to see where it goes from here if Charles pops the clogs in the next year or so.



Don't think Labour will need to go near it, once Charles goes it will start to happen naturally. Eventually they will end up like the Royals in European countries, on the side lines.



They are on the sidelines since Cromwell I think. They have no power to think off and giving them no oxygen will do them the power of good, as who da feck wants to have that life?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: clarshack on March 18, 2024, 11:17:42 PM
https://x.com/stephanieriou/status/1769824047490105457
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: red hander on March 22, 2024, 05:37:15 PM
Believe there's announcement incoming at 6pm about Willie's wife.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: SaffronSports on March 22, 2024, 06:02:51 PM
She has cancer apparently. I wish her well.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2024, 06:18:45 PM
Quote from: SaffronSports on March 22, 2024, 06:02:51 PMShe has cancer apparently. I wish her well.
It's a pity she felt the need to announce it on camera just to get the headers off her case.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Milltown Row2 on March 22, 2024, 06:28:31 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2024, 06:18:45 PM
Quote from: SaffronSports on March 22, 2024, 06:02:51 PMShe has cancer apparently. I wish her well.
It's a pity she felt the need to announce it on camera just to get the headers off her case.

Anyone that's had family through cancer and having chemo know that it's a horrible experience.

I wish her well
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: armaghniac on March 22, 2024, 06:37:54 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on March 22, 2024, 06:28:31 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2024, 06:18:45 PM
Quote from: SaffronSports on March 22, 2024, 06:02:51 PMShe has cancer apparently. I wish her well.
It's a pity she felt the need to announce it on camera just to get the headers off her case.

Anyone that's had family through cancer and having chemo know that it's a horrible experience.

I wish her well

Chemo is a hard treatment. I think everyone can sympathise with a mother going through this, whatever their political views.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Captain Obvious on March 22, 2024, 06:54:02 PM
Had feeling there was bad news they didn't want to make public. Wishing Kate a full recovery
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: tonto1888 on March 22, 2024, 07:16:01 PM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on March 22, 2024, 06:28:31 PM
Quote from: Tony Baloney on March 22, 2024, 06:18:45 PM
Quote from: SaffronSports on March 22, 2024, 06:02:51 PMShe has cancer apparently. I wish her well.
It's a pity she felt the need to announce it on camera just to get the headers off her case.

Anyone that's had family through cancer and having chemo know that it's a horrible experience.

I wish her well

My father lost his battle with cancer nearly 12 years ago. Horrible horrible disease. I wish her a full recovery
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Eamonnca1 on March 24, 2024, 05:27:50 AM
Anybody hear any rumours that Charlie's cancer is the pancreatic variety? It would certainly explain why they're so tight-lipped about the type of cancer, especially with the low survival rates with that one. Awful stuff.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: RedHand88 on March 24, 2024, 06:51:49 AM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on March 24, 2024, 05:27:50 AMAnybody hear any rumours that Charlie's cancer is the pancreatic variety? It would certainly explain why they're so tight-lipped about the type of cancer, especially with the low survival rates with that one. Awful stuff.

Was it not discovered during a prostate exam?
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Tony Baloney on March 24, 2024, 07:40:53 AM
Quote from: RedHand88 on March 24, 2024, 06:51:49 AM
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on March 24, 2024, 05:27:50 AMAnybody hear any rumours that Charlie's cancer is the pancreatic variety? It would certainly explain why they're so tight-lipped about the type of cancer, especially with the low survival rates with that one. Awful stuff.

Was it not discovered during a prostate exam?
Yes but pretty sure it was confirmed as not prostate cancer.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: seafoid on March 24, 2024, 08:26:49 AM
A young mother with cancer is a very hard station.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: johnnycool on March 25, 2024, 09:07:33 AM
Quote from: seafoid on March 24, 2024, 08:26:49 AMA young mother with cancer is a very hard station.

Well she won't be on a NHS waiting list, that's for sure.

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Milltown Row2 on March 25, 2024, 09:18:43 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 25, 2024, 09:07:33 AM
Quote from: seafoid on March 24, 2024, 08:26:49 AMA young mother with cancer is a very hard station.

Well she won't be on a NHS waiting list, that's for sure.



Nope, and if I had the chance or money to go private I would.

The NHS for a lot of things is crap, both my experiences though with Cancer they did the best.

But there's some horror stories out there of mixed diagnosis (her mum) followed by incorrect treatment resulting in permanent stoma bags going in!

In this case, cancer was treated and successfully, but her life is permanent care... Cancer, you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: johnnycool on March 25, 2024, 09:22:55 AM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on March 25, 2024, 09:18:43 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 25, 2024, 09:07:33 AM
Quote from: seafoid on March 24, 2024, 08:26:49 AMA young mother with cancer is a very hard station.

Well she won't be on a NHS waiting list, that's for sure.



Nope, and if I had the chance or money to go private I would.

The NHS for a lot of things is crap, both my experiences though with Cancer they did the best.

But there's some horror stories out there of mixed diagnosis (her mum) followed by incorrect treatment resulting in permanent stoma bags going in!

In this case, cancer was treated and successfully, but her life is permanent care... Cancer, you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy



There's not many private healthcare schemes that cover cancer treatment I believe, but that might have changed over the years but I know of quite a lot of people who need chemo or radiotherapy but are on a waiting list and that cannot be good for end outcomes...

Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: imtommygunn on March 25, 2024, 09:24:13 AM
Life expectancy already dipping (I think) in these parts of the world and it is going to dip a good bit further I would suspect with the state of things.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Milltown Row2 on March 25, 2024, 09:27:05 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 25, 2024, 09:22:55 AM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on March 25, 2024, 09:18:43 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 25, 2024, 09:07:33 AM
Quote from: seafoid on March 24, 2024, 08:26:49 AMA young mother with cancer is a very hard station.

Well she won't be on a NHS waiting list, that's for sure.



Nope, and if I had the chance or money to go private I would.

The NHS for a lot of things is crap, both my experiences though with Cancer they did the best.

But there's some horror stories out there of mixed diagnosis (her mum) followed by incorrect treatment resulting in permanent stoma bags going in!

In this case, cancer was treated and successfully, but her life is permanent care... Cancer, you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy



There's not many private healthcare schemes that cover cancer treatment I believe, but that might have changed over the years but I know of quite a lot of people who need chemo or radiotherapy but are on a waiting list and that cannot be good for end outcomes...



NHS you're right, they look after it after diagnosis. But that initial assessment and getting it correct you can go private. Getting that early correct call is so important

But again if I'd the means, I'd be private all day long, there is more accountability, and while it's the same doctor doing both the needs are looked after better when paying.
Title: Re: King Charles III
Post by: Armagh18 on March 25, 2024, 09:41:23 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 25, 2024, 09:22:55 AM
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on March 25, 2024, 09:18:43 AM
Quote from: johnnycool on March 25, 2024, 09:07:33 AM
Quote from: seafoid on March 24, 2024, 08:26:49 AMA young mother with cancer is a very hard station.

Well she won't be on a NHS waiting list, that's for sure.



Nope, and if I had the chance or money to go private I would.

The NHS for a lot of things is crap, both my experiences though with Cancer they did the best.

But there's some horror stories out there of mixed diagnosis (her mum) followed by incorrect treatment resulting in permanent stoma bags going in!

In this case, cancer was treated and successfully, but her life is permanent care... Cancer, you wouldn't wish on your worst enemy



There's not many private healthcare schemes that cover cancer treatment I believe, but that might have changed over the years but I know of quite a lot of people who need chemo or radiotherapy but are on a waiting list and that cannot be good for end outcomes...


Yeah true and thats disgraceful. The best chance you have against cancer is getting it diagnosed early and treated asap.