Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - seafoid

#21286
General discussion / Re: 2016 Summer Olympics Rio
August 15, 2016, 04:48:47 PM
It is all going tits up for the OCI between the tickets and the boxing.
#21287
General discussion / Re: 2016 Summer Olympics Rio
August 15, 2016, 04:47:34 PM
Quote from: muppet on August 15, 2016, 04:42:47 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on August 15, 2016, 04:29:38 PM
Well to be fair English was in a world final and has spent most of the year injured. Mageean medalled at european but the thing about her is she has had 2 of the last 4 years injured so if she doesn't succumb to injury again I would expect much bigger things from her. She needs to break 2 for the 800 and get her speed from it.

Any which way personally i think our world class definitions differ. You do sub 10 and in my view you're world class.

Incidentally Catriona McKiernan you have missed there. World XC silver medalist multiple times , 2:21 odd marathoner and european xc winner.

Yes Catriona was world class, and plenty of others (Ronnie Delaney for example). My list wan't meant to be exclusive. As for English, if he made a World Final then fair enough.

But to me world class is not top 30. That would put Leitrim as a 'top class' Gaelic Football team. Are Ireland or Northern Ireland world class soccer teams?
There are more than 33 athletes. Leitrim is a non sequitur.
#21288
General discussion / Re: 2016 Summer Olympics Rio
August 15, 2016, 04:37:15 PM
Quote from: imtommygunn on August 15, 2016, 03:51:33 PM
Yeah it's not that big a stretch. Interesting that he did it from lane 8. First time that has been done since 1924 apparently...

I love the athletics but it is sad that these days any significant record etc will automatically be questioned. I'd like to give Ayala the benefit of the doubt to be honest as well. just because the person who's record she beat was doped doesn't mean that she dopes. It's an easy conclusion to make. Of course I could be completely wrong.

The more I read on Farah the less convinced I am. On Dibaba too which is a pity as she is a fantastic athlete. They are raising questions on themselves though by associating with suspect people. I am not sure Ayala or the dutch guy have. (Be they guilty or not)
Mo is not credible.
#21289
General discussion / Re: Brexit.
August 15, 2016, 02:40:29 PM
Quote from: armaghniac on August 15, 2016, 12:59:52 PM
Quote from: muppet on August 15, 2016, 12:44:58 PM
Quote from: Hereiam on August 15, 2016, 10:44:15 AM
What do people think will be the first real impact that Joe blogs is going to suffer because of the brexit and how soon.

If the exchange rate matters to you or your work, then that might be the first effect.

Otherwise recession and all that goes with it (rising unemployment, more austerity etc.).

When? in the next few months, possibly before the Brexit talks even begin.

With sterling having dropped, inflation in the UK will kick up fairly quickly, with all of  the uncertainty around wages etc will not necessarily follow.
The pensioners who voted for Brexit will find their pensions/annuities etc going down, while prices tend to go up.
UK wages have been falling in real terms since 08. Productivity growth is chronic. The UK is fucked.
#21291
General discussion / Re: 2016 Summer Olympics Rio
August 15, 2016, 10:27:02 AM
Quote from: moysider on August 15, 2016, 03:01:22 AM
Quote from: JimStynes on August 15, 2016, 02:43:20 AM
Olympics and athletics in general have been ruined a bit. Worst Olympics I can remember and every result is suspect now.

It's every sport. There was doping back in the 70's and probably before as well. Plus ça change. Lasse Viren accused of blood transfusions back in the 70's.

Sport is about getting better and faster. Are we expecting athletes to get slower and weaker while human achievement in technology etc. snowballs. I think that it is normal that improved nutrition and general standard of living in developing countries will see exceptionally talented individuals emerge.
WADA has a budget of 23 million USD . The IOC doesn't care about doping.
#21292
General discussion / Re: Brexit.
August 15, 2016, 10:25:24 AM
Mr Subsea 9 days ago
Country and continent ruined by David Cameron's weakness in the face of UKIP, and not a single politician with the courage to stand up and state the obvious - that the public as a whole simply doesn't have the intellectual capacity to be allowed to vote on matters of such enormous consequence to all. Too many  are easily manipulated by Machiavellan forces like to Murdoch, Dacre & Co.
The one thing I am struggling to figure out is what these dark forces actually have to gain in the aggregate from the global depression that I fear will be the longer term ramification of Brexit. Ultimately it can't be good for global businesses like those Murduch presides over so I can only conclude it's about power, manipulation and control for their own sake. Horrifying really.
Eden de Vizes 9 days ago
It is increasingly clear that Brexit is a disaster. Even if there were a road map to achieving a sustainable alternative, which there clearly isn't, there is no basis for having any faith in the governmental & administrative resources of the U.K. to follow it.
As Martin Wolf remarked in the debate leading up to the referendum: "Leavers are mad". At that point he just meant: mad to want that outcome. But now we can see that madness indeed rules.
To think that Brexit can be made to work satisfactorily is now objectively to suspend rational thought. That's not the same thing as saying the EU is ideal & does not need reform.
The Leave campaign wrapped itself in a flag of jingoistic patriotism (and I will not even mention the lies). The true patriots now are those of us who are committed in every way to stopping this lunacy.
Rail at me, you Brexiteers. I know you will. But please read the tsunami of informed opinion and analysis showing your position to be fantastical, impractical and effectively unachievable.
#21293
General discussion / Re: Brexit.
August 15, 2016, 10:24:34 AM
David Allen Green FT guest writer9 days ago
@Hyerophant
Little is (literally) impossible in the field of human affairs, and so most political objectives can be achieved with skill and will-power sufficient for the task in question.
There is, however, no indication that there is sufficient political skill and will-power for the task of Brexit.
Italianstallion 9 days ago
@David Allen Green @Hyerophant David.  Please be franker.  At the moment there is no indication of any actual objectives for the negotiation, and no indication of any knowledge of basic facts.  Once we have these we can worry about second order things like skill and will power
ReportShare
RecommendReply
Rabiusa 9 days ago
I appreciate the hard truths exposed by this article. I predict that Brexit will be a very messy and chaotic affair. I clean break is impossible without doing irreparable damage to the UK economy, and by contrast any long-term dithering by the current government in implementing article 50 will simply prolong the economic uncertainty and may backfire politically. I do not believe May's appointments have what it takes to negotiate a good deal for Britain upon its eventual withdrawal (or ejection). It's going to be a mess, and it will damage the UK economy. The question is to what extent and how acutely. The lack of planning for exit by either the Brexiteers or the previous government is so negligent and naive it is almost criminal.
Fisher of Men 9 days ago
Excellent article.  I work in the Middle East alongside international executives, many of whom come from countries Brexiters hope to trade with.  I offer some context from the coal face for our intrepid Ministers. 
None can understand why UK is doing this and firmly believe we have weakened our international standing. They all laugh about the idea of us entering into WTO or bilateral negotiations as they know UK comes begging and will get well and truly shafted. 
Specific comments by country:
Saudis - 'you are now weak - how can you hope to negotiate from such a position.  Why doesn't your Queen do something?'
Chinese - 'you forget we are not really interested in trading with UK - we are only interested in buying houses in London and gaining access to your universities '
Americans - 'we still can't believe you allowed this to happen - how can one of the oldest democracies and guardian of English Law permit a bunch of Ministers to commit economic suicide.  And then you appoint them to define your future relationship with the EU and us!  Is this some sort of Mr Bean sketch....'
French - 'Don't worry my friend - there will be some sort of solution found'
Indians - 'we will trade with you but what are you going to sell to us.? You have already given us your best exports - cricket, the railways and the Civil Service.  Have you any idea how insanely difficult it is to do business in India!'
I could go on and whether you agree or disagree with the comments they show the size and scale of the task ahead.
Time to find Bulldog Drummond and Union Jack Jackson........but sadly this is the real world.
#21294
General discussion / Re: Brexit.
August 15, 2016, 10:22:58 AM
Martin Wolf, FT FT11 days ago
@SpeakingUp I strongly agree. The Leavers persuaded the British people to support them on a fraudulent basis. They also had (and have) no plan for leaving. That is worse than merely fraudulent. It is grotesquely irresponsible. The fact that this was the case was pointed out by many commentators (including me). The government is not to blame for not having a plan for Brexit, since there simply is no sensible plan for Brexit. Whatever the government does, it is going to be a terrible mess. The government is instead to blame for holding the idiotic referendum in the first place. Competent governments do not present the option of a national disaster before the electorate


sun carriage 9 days ago
@Armchair Economist. The harshest criticism in my view of Cameron, was his refusal to allow the Civil Servants to have prepared for the possibility of defeat, over the referendum. He put winning in front of the interests of his country. I do not think, that is forgivable.
Coase Theorem 9 days ago
sun carriage
But is EEA what the UK wants?
No
The U.K. doesn't know what it wants
Deciding what the UK wants is David Davis's job and he hasn't decided yet
As it happens EEA doesn't involve that much work (that's one of its virtues) so a lack of planning for it doesn't preclude it
What precludes it is that we don't know if as a country we want it

Italianstallion 9 days ago
@Coase Theorem Actually, David Davis thinks he knows what he wants (a special deal for UK, if not WTO then  later free trade deals).  This is worse than someone saying that the situation is new, lets think about what I want. If the Brexiteers would freely admit that they need time to work out what they want, as opposed to "preparation" time,  I for one would gain respect for them; as it is they (Davis and e.g Jenkins), live in a false world of certainty - only inconvenienced by the facts around them.  That is deeply worrying to me.  The comments on the civil service not being prepared are silly - how could they prepare for an inchoate desire to leave without any view about where to go next.
#21295
Caliban's Dream by Underworld via the Lisheen NS video saluting their rowers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mec8GZkEpD4

Cowgirl by Underworld
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn_ftCcfvXY
#21296
General discussion / Re: 2016 Summer Olympics Rio
August 15, 2016, 06:25:32 AM
Quote from: moysider on August 15, 2016, 03:43:48 AM
Quote from: Line Ball on August 15, 2016, 03:10:58 AM
I'm not sure if it's the coverage, the attendances, the atmosphere or what but it just doesn't seem nearly half as exciting as previous Olympics.  Even Bolt winning was good but not great and I'm not talking about his performance. Something different and I can't figure out what but it's not great.

I'm enjoying them. Rio is probably not the best place for Olympics. If games were in Europe or US, the athletics would be sold out.

FIFA and IOC need to stop this nonsense of giving games to places to Rio, Quatar!! and Russia!

Rio has millions of people living in favelas that they can not provide services for. Yet they have spent billions on these games. Sad that during the women's marathon that they needed such security to keep protesters at bay. The people of Rio didn't want these games. It took Montreal 30 years to pay for their Olympics. Montreal is a developed city. How long will it take an impoverished city like Rio to pay for this? The bottom line is they will have to pay and the it will be the poor that will take the brunt. Their lives will still be shit while the city will be paying off depts for decades. The games will finish up in a week and Rio will be quickly forgotten. There will be no long-term benefit for Rio from these games. All they will have is a big bill that they can't afford.
There was a stat about the Olympics and home demolitions especially is poor countries like Brazil and China. I think the total was 2 million over 30 years.
#21297
Hurling Discussion / Re: Hurling Semi Finals
August 14, 2016, 06:00:07 PM
Disappointing but there was nothing in it. Best post all ireland final season in a long time. Will be there or thereabouts for the next 5 years.
The mol an óige agus tiocfaidh sí policy that Cunningham started is building consistency. They have to work on the fade outs in the last 10 minutes too. But it is way better than 2006-11.
#21298
General discussion / Re: Brexit.
August 14, 2016, 03:57:14 PM
Quote from: muppet on August 14, 2016, 03:18:14 PM
That is scary reading.
It is beyond hopeless I think.

The comments on the article go into more depth. There is zero upside for the UK.
I will post a few next week.
#21299
Hurling Discussion / Re: Hurling Semi Finals
August 14, 2016, 03:42:19 PM
Good to get an early goal
#21300
Hurling Discussion / Re: Hurling Semi Finals
August 14, 2016, 03:12:32 PM
That is some Tipp minor team