Ooh aah Pete Mc Grath
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: DownFanatic on July 16, 2015, 10:55:09 AMQuote from: johnneycool on July 16, 2015, 08:45:37 AMQuote from: lfdown2 on July 16, 2015, 08:35:16 AM
It is surely the underage structures that need looked at, I would be of the opinion that the talent needs to be developed through minor to U21 which can then translate in to the senior team, we seen from the minor teams of 99 & 05 the small number that will filter through to the seniors and as such need a greater volume of successful teams under the seniors. I do not have any solutions, just believe the knee jerk reactions of 'sack the manager' are only diverting attention from where we should be looking.
Does anyone think that the new underage groupings will be a hindrance to minor, U21 managers as they won't be able to see who's competing well at these respective age groups as we're moving to U17, U19, etc etc?
The U-19 grade will be a disaster. There are going to be lads at first year at Uni who could be playing and training with the Freshers. Factor in playing and training with their club senior team plus the expectation on some to play reserve football plus the playing and training with their own U-19 grade. God help then the player who has county U-21 commitments too.
This seemed to be voted in quite overwhelmingly by county board reps. I genuinely think a lot of these reps just vote on their own bat. I doubt many of them actually canvass their club committee on these issues. If there was any sort of meaningful discussion in the clubs then this pilot scheme would never have been passed.
Quote from: wobbller on May 14, 2015, 06:03:19 PM
Fair enough points alright. But do you oblige Clubs for Stags,Weddings, etc
if the proposed refix date weakens your own Club's chances?