Messages

[near the goal]

By the letter of the law it was a pull down. The law was to stop cynical fouls when a player is in loads of space. The play was well away from it. There was two at that and the evidence suggests Hampsey didn't start it. It should have been two yellows.

On the one at the end of extra time, it looked like McKernan(?) wanted to put himself in the way, but that the Cavan player also looked to get the contact too. Does every time a player gives a wee push to another one off the ball, regardless of where the ball is, does that count as a black by the letter of the law because it's impeding. McCurry was pulling up with cramp and a Cavan player bundled him over, is that a black for impeding him? There were a lot of high tackles by Cavan players which went unpunished too which Cavan fans conveniently ignore too.

 All this inconsistent application and never ending debates about technical interpreation is tiresome and takes away from the joy of football.

The GAA need to simplify the rules. I think give a black if a player tries to stop a free being taken (as this is a regular tactic to foul and slow the free taken so as to get men back). If a player tries to cynically stop a goal scoring opportunity, be it near the goal or where the team has loads of space in front of them, give a penalty. If a team keeps committing fouls, like rugby, give a black card once a threshold has been passed. Get rid of the forward mark.

You're asking to simplify the rules but then add in rules which will be interpreted differently by every ref lol.

Players play within the rules and we are good to go?

You've just put in a rule now where there is no accurate defintion. What counts as near the goal and loads of space? Just asking for trouble with adding in subjective rules

Once patton realised he'd effed up by faking an injury he sprinted at top speed over to the dug out so he could come back on     

So were Donegal  without  a keeper while play continued?

yea for about a minute and a half

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAjQrnImT_k

Lets get the band back together

That was outside!!

Goal scoring opportunity doesn't have to be inside.  3-8 to 0-10

Should it be a black card then?

No. The denial of goal scoring chance isn't an automatic black card offence. For this rule to take effect the foul itself must be a black card offence which the derry defender didn't commit

Goal scoring opportunity so once its inside 21 its a pen. Thought it should be black under new rule?

David all about me Gough has to give a black card for something after.

No. It must be a black card offence which denies a goal scoring opportunity.

It wasn't a black card offence.

Black card wasn't given. Gough thought it was inside.

Correct.

Goal scoring opportunity so once its inside 21 its a pen. Thought it should be black under new rule?

David all about me Gough has to give a black card for something after.

Wasn't a black card foul so Gough must have just thought contact was in the box

That was outside!!

Goal scoring opportunity doesn't have to be inside.  3-8 to 0-10

Has to be a black card for the offender for that rule to come into play

I know Oran will probably get a lot of flak personally but I'm sure he's doing exactly what Harte has asked him to do.

What was written on the pitch?

Good goal if you dont count the steps

Wrong man send off there, I think the boy in question didn't come out of the changing room.

I'm sure the real culprit will be dealt with retrospectivelty

I think back when I was in school a school that competed at A level could send 3 players, B level could send 2 players and a C level school could send 1 player

"This does not f**king slip" vibes

Celtic have been poor this half. Not sure what Suttons on about it's a penalty all day!

I thought it was very soft pen. Clearly pokes the ball away. Would have only been a penalty if it was foul play as getting the ball doesn't matter during foul play.

Not even the Ranger's co-commentator thought it was remotely a penalty.

It was basically the same penalty as Jesus got yesterday.

Just because that Rangers lad loves to dive and roll around doesn't mean it wasn't one he was clearly caught.

Contact doesn't mean its a penalty when the ball was clearly toepoked away very clearly first. Not all contact is judged the same, so just because one ref says it's a penalty doesn't mean that another ref would give the same outcome

Celtic have been poor this half. Not sure what Suttons on about it's a penalty all day!

I thought it was very soft pen. Clearly pokes the ball away. Would have only been a penalty if it was foul play as getting the ball doesn't matter during foul play.